State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 18;15(11):2580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112580.
The role of carbon pool of biochar as a method of long-term C sequestration in global warming mitigation is unclear. A two-year field study was conducted to investigate the seasonal variations of CO₂ emissions from water-saving irrigation paddy fields in response to biochar amendment and irrigation patterns. Three biochar treatments under water-saving irrigation and one biochar treatment under flooding irrigation were studied, and the application rates were 0, 20, 40, and 40 t ha and labeled as CI + NB (controlled irrigation and none biochar added), CI + MB (controlled irrigation and medium biochar added), CI + HB (controlled irrigation and high biochar added), and FI + HB (flood irrigation and high biochar added), respectively. Results showed that biochar application at medium rates (20 t ha) decreased CO₂ emissions by 1.64⁻8.83% in rice paddy fields under water-saving irrigation, compared with the non-amendment treatment. However, the CO₂ emissions from paddy fields increased by 4.39⁻5.43% in the CI + HB treatment, compared with CI + NB. Furthermore, the mean CO₂ emissions from paddy fields under water-saving irrigation decreased by 2.22% compared with flood irrigation under the same amount of biochar application (40 t ha). Biochar amendment increased rice yield and water use efficiency by 9.35⁻36.30% and 15.1⁻42.5%, respectively, when combined with water-saving irrigation. The CO₂ emissions were reduced in the CI + MB treatment, which then increased rice yield. The CO₂ emissions from paddy fields were positively correlated with temperature. The highest value of the temperature sensitivity coefficient (Q) was derived for the CI + MB treatment. The Q was higher under water-saving irrigation compared with flooding irrigation.
生物炭碳库作为减缓全球变暖的长期碳封存方法的作用尚不清楚。本研究进行了为期两年的田间试验,以调查节水灌溉稻田中 CO₂排放对生物炭添加和灌溉方式的季节性变化。在节水灌溉条件下研究了三种生物炭处理(分别为 CI + NB、CI + MB 和 CI + HB)和一种淹水灌溉条件下的生物炭处理(FI + HB),生物炭施用量分别为 0、20、40 和 40 t ha,并分别标记为 CI + NB(对照灌溉且未添加生物炭)、CI + MB(对照灌溉且添加中量生物炭)、CI + HB(对照灌溉且添加大量生物炭)和 FI + HB(淹水灌溉且添加大量生物炭)。结果表明,与不添加生物炭相比,在节水灌溉条件下,中量生物炭(20 t ha)添加可使稻田 CO₂排放减少 1.64%8.83%。然而,与 CI + NB 相比,CI + HB 处理下稻田 CO₂排放增加了 4.39%5.43%。此外,在相同生物炭施用量(40 t ha)下,与淹水灌溉相比,节水灌溉条件下稻田 CO₂排放平均减少了 2.22%。生物炭添加与节水灌溉相结合可使水稻产量和水分利用效率分别提高 9.35%36.30%和 15.1%42.5%。在 CI + MB 处理下,CO₂排放量减少,而水稻产量增加。稻田 CO₂排放量与温度呈正相关。CI + MB 处理的温度敏感性系数(Q)最高。与淹水灌溉相比,节水灌溉下的 Q 值更高。