Suppr超能文献

比较时间和动作方法在塞内加尔计划生育供应链干预背景下研究人员时间的应用。

Comparing time and motion methods to study personnel time in the context of a family planning supply chain intervention in Senegal.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2018 Nov 19;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0328-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A family planning (FP) supply chain intervention was introduced in Senegal in 2012 to reduce contraceptive stock-outs. Labour is the highest cost in low- and middle-income country supply chains. In this paper, we (1) understand time use of personnel working in the FP supply chain at health facilities in Senegal, (2) estimate the validity of self-administered timesheets (STs) relative to continuous observations (COs), and (3) describe the cost of data collection for each method.

METHODS

We collected time use data for seven stockroom managers in six facilities using both ST and CO. Activities were categorized as follows: stock management associated with FP, non-FP stock management, other productive activities, non-productive activities, and waiting time. Paired t tests were used to compare the mean differences between the two methods in all categories and in productive time alone.

RESULTS

Among all activities, the absolute and relative time spent on productive activities was higher when estimated by ST compared to CO. Conversely, waiting time was underestimated by STs. There was no difference in the relative time spent on non-productive activities. When comparing the distribution of the three productive activity categories, we found no evidence of a difference in relative time percentage estimates between CO and ST (FP stockroom management - 3.0%, 95% CI - 7.4 to 1.4%; non-FP stockroom management 3.4%, 95% CI - 2.8 to 9.6%; and other productive activities - 0.1%, 95% CI - 6.3 to 6.0%). Data collection costs for CO are 140% more than ST.

CONCLUSION

STs were not a reliable method for measuring absolute labour time at health facilities in Senegal due to considerable underestimates of time waiting for clients. However, ST had acceptable reliability when examining distribution of productive time. Although CO provides more accurate absolute time estimates, the unit costs for data collection using this method are more than triple those for STs in Senegal.

摘要

背景

2012 年,塞内加尔引入了一项计划生育(FP)供应链干预措施,以减少避孕用品缺货。劳动力是中低收入国家供应链中成本最高的因素。在本文中,我们(1)了解塞内加尔卫生机构 FP 供应链工作人员的时间利用情况,(2)评估自我报告时间表(ST)与连续观察(CO)的有效性,(3)描述每种方法的数据收集成本。

方法

我们使用 ST 和 CO 收集了六个设施中的七名仓库经理的时间使用数据。活动分为以下几类:与 FP 相关的库存管理、非 FP 库存管理、其他生产性活动、非生产性活动和等待时间。使用配对 t 检验比较了两种方法在所有类别和生产性时间中的平均差异。

结果

在所有活动中,与 CO 相比,ST 估计的生产性活动的绝对和相对时间花费更高。相反,ST 低估了等待时间。非生产性活动的相对时间花费没有差异。当比较这三种生产性活动类别的分布时,我们没有发现 CO 和 ST 之间的相对时间百分比估计存在差异(FP 仓库管理-3.0%,95%CI-7.4 至 1.4%;非 FP 仓库管理 3.4%,95%CI-2.8 至 9.6%;其他生产性活动-0.1%,95%CI-6.3 至 6.0%)。CO 的数据收集成本比 ST 高 140%。

结论

由于对等待客户的时间估计过低,ST 不是塞内加尔卫生机构衡量绝对劳动力时间的可靠方法。然而,ST 在检查生产性时间的分布时具有可接受的可靠性。尽管 CO 提供了更准确的绝对时间估计,但在塞内加尔,使用这种方法的数据收集单位成本比 ST 高三倍以上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb1/6245801/3bb9840610bd/12960_2018_328_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验