Suppr超能文献

神经系统疾病患者的机械通气管理与撤机

Management and weaning from mechanical ventilation in neurologic patients.

作者信息

Cinotti Raphaël, Bouras Marwan, Roquilly Antoine, Asehnoune Karim

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôtel Dieu, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.

Unité INSERM 942 "Biomarqueurs et pathologie cardiaque", Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2018 Oct;6(19):381. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.16.

Abstract

In the early phase following severe brain injury (BI), mechanical ventilation (MV) is often needed to prevent airway from aspiration, control PaCO and PaO and avoid secondary brain insults. Although patients with BI are frequently hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) without respiratory problems, they display longer durations of MV and a challenging weaning process compared to other ICU populations. Historically, the MV settings of BI patients associated high tidal volume with low or no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), for neurological reasons. The extensive data about the beneficial effects of protective ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, have questioned the consequences of such management in BI patients. Recent studies suggest that protective ventilation is safe and could even bear significant impact on morbidity in these patients. The MV weaning process is also challenging, since these patients display a high rate of extubation failure. Recently, new clinical scales of successful extubation have been highlighted combining airway and neurologic operators. A minimal level of arousal should be achieved before extubation, but the Glasgow Coma Score has been inconsistently associated with successful extubation, probably owing to the challenging quantification in intubated patients. Early tracheostomy seems to bear positive effects on morbidity in BI patients. Nonetheless the level of evidence remains poor and no strong recommendations can be made on this topic. Overall, the respiratory bundle of care in BI patients could be readapted with the new data available in the literature. Even if they bear positive impact on morbidity in ICU, their consequences on neurological recovery have yet to be adequately assessed.

摘要

在严重脑损伤(BI)后的早期阶段,通常需要机械通气(MV)来防止气道误吸、控制动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO)和动脉血氧分压(PaO)并避免继发性脑损伤。尽管BI患者经常因无呼吸问题而入住重症监护病房(ICU),但与其他ICU患者群体相比,他们的机械通气持续时间更长且撤机过程具有挑战性。从历史上看,出于神经学原因,BI患者的机械通气设置为高潮气量伴低呼气末正压(PEEP)或无呼气末正压。关于保护性通气对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者有益效果的大量数据,对BI患者的这种管理方式的后果提出了质疑。最近的研究表明,保护性通气是安全的,甚至可能对这些患者的发病率产生重大影响。机械通气撤机过程也具有挑战性,因为这些患者的拔管失败率很高。最近,结合气道和神经学指标的新的成功拔管临床量表受到了关注。拔管前应达到最低觉醒水平,但格拉斯哥昏迷评分与成功拔管的相关性并不一致,这可能是由于插管患者的量化具有挑战性。早期气管切开术似乎对BI患者的发病率有积极影响。尽管如此,证据水平仍然很低,在这个问题上无法提出强有力的建议。总体而言,BI患者的呼吸护理方案可根据文献中的新数据进行调整。即使它们对ICU患者的发病率有积极影响,但其对神经功能恢复的影响尚未得到充分评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Weaning Outcomes in Patients with Brain Injury.脑损伤患者的撤机结果
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Dec;37(3):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01584-2. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验