• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单倍群 K 的古老分布范围表明,欧洲的新石器时代转型主要是人群迁徙的结果。

The ancient cline of haplogroup K implies that the Neolithic transition in Europe was mainly demic.

机构信息

Complex Systems Laboratory, Universitat de Girona, C/Maria Aurèlia Capmany 61, 17003, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 3, 08010, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11629-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-11629-8
PMID:28894281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594011/
Abstract

Using a database with the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of 513 Neolithic individuals, we quantify the space-time variation of the frequency of haplogroup K, previously proposed as a relevant Neolithic marker. We compare these data to simulations, based on a mathematical model in which a Neolithic population spreads from Syria to Anatolia and Europe, possibly interbreeding with Mesolithic individuals (who lack haplogroup K) and/or teaching farming to them. Both the data and the simulations show that the percentage of haplogroup K (%K) decreases with increasing distance from Syria and that, in each region, the %K tends to decrease with increasing time after the arrival of farming. Both the model and the data display a local minimum of the genetic cline, and for the same Neolithic regional culture (Sweden). Comparing the observed ancient cline of haplogroup K to the simulation results reveals that about 98% of farmers were not involved in interbreeding neither acculturation (cultural diffusion). Therefore, cultural diffusion involved only a tiny fraction (about 2%) of farmers and, in this sense, the most relevant process in the spread of the Neolithic in Europe was demic diffusion (i.e., the dispersal of farmers), as opposed to cultural diffusion (i.e., the incorporation of hunter-gatherers).

摘要

利用一个包含 513 名新石器时代个体的线粒体 DNA (mtDNA) 的数据库,我们量化了单倍群 K 频率的时空变化,此前该单倍群被提出作为一个相关的新石器时代标记。我们将这些数据与模拟结果进行了比较,模拟结果基于一个数学模型,该模型假设新石器时代的人口从叙利亚扩散到安纳托利亚和欧洲,可能与中石器时代的个体(他们缺乏单倍群 K)杂交,或者向他们传授农业。数据和模拟都表明,单倍群 K 的百分比(%K)随着与叙利亚距离的增加而减少,并且在每个地区,%K 在农业到来后的时间增加时趋于减少。模型和数据都显示了遗传渐变的局部最小值,并且对于相同的新石器时代区域文化(瑞典),观察到的单倍群 K 的古老渐变与模拟结果一致,表明大约 98%的农民没有参与杂交也没有受到文化融合(文化扩散)的影响。因此,文化融合只涉及了一小部分(约 2%)的农民,在这个意义上,新石器时代在欧洲传播的最相关过程是人口扩散(即农民的分散),而不是文化融合(即采集狩猎者的融入)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/4070e4d495c4/41598_2017_11629_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/e6d7e719d237/41598_2017_11629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/8f5e0d36ca89/41598_2017_11629_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/4070e4d495c4/41598_2017_11629_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/e6d7e719d237/41598_2017_11629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/8f5e0d36ca89/41598_2017_11629_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677c/5594011/4070e4d495c4/41598_2017_11629_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The ancient cline of haplogroup K implies that the Neolithic transition in Europe was mainly demic.单倍群 K 的古老分布范围表明,欧洲的新石器时代转型主要是人群迁徙的结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11629-8.
2
Interbreeding between farmers and hunter-gatherers along the inland and Mediterranean routes of Neolithic spread in Europe.新石器时代内陆和地中海路线上的农民和狩猎采集者之间的杂交在欧洲传播。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 15;15(1):7032. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51335-4.
3
Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe.人口和文化传播推动了新石器时代的转变在欧洲不同地区的传播。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 May 6;12(106). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0166.
4
Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia.估算新石器时代在斯堪的纳维亚传播过程中,人群迁徙和文化传播的相对重要性。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):20180597. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0597.
5
Complete mitochondrial genomes reveal neolithic expansion into Europe.完整的线粒体基因组揭示了新石器时代向欧洲的扩张。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032473. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
6
Ancient mitochondrial DNA from the northern fringe of the Neolithic farming expansion in Europe sheds light on the dispersion process.来自欧洲新石器时代农业扩张北缘的古代线粒体DNA揭示了扩散过程。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 19;370(1660):20130373. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0373.
7
Ancient DNA from hunter-gatherer and farmer groups from Northern Spain supports a random dispersion model for the Neolithic expansion into Europe.来自西班牙北部的狩猎采集者和农民群体的古代 DNA 支持新石器时代向欧洲扩张的随机扩散模型。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034417. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
A genomic Neolithic time transect of hunter-farmer admixture in central Poland.波兰中部新石器时代狩猎采集者混合的基因组时间剖面。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 5;8(1):14879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33067-w.
9
Ancient DNA analysis of 8000 B.C. near eastern farmers supports an early neolithic pioneer maritime colonization of Mainland Europe through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands.对公元前8000年近东农民的古DNA分析支持了新石器时代早期先驱者经塞浦路斯和爱琴海诸岛对欧洲大陆进行海上殖民的观点。
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jun 5;10(6):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004401. eCollection 2014 Jun.
10
Ancient genomes from North Africa evidence prehistoric migrations to the Maghreb from both the Levant and Europe.来自北非的古代基因组证据表明,史前时期从黎凡特和欧洲向马格里布进行了迁徙。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6774-6779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800851115. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the European Neolithic expansion suggests predominant within-group mating and limited cultural transmission.对欧洲新石器时代扩张的建模表明,群体内交配占主导,文化传播有限。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 25;16(1):7905. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63172-0.
2
Interbreeding between farmers and hunter-gatherers along the inland and Mediterranean routes of Neolithic spread in Europe.新石器时代内陆和地中海路线上的农民和狩猎采集者之间的杂交在欧洲传播。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 15;15(1):7032. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51335-4.
3
Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroup K Is Protective Against Autism Spectrum Disorder Risk in Populations of European Ancestry.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating mitochondrial DNA relationships in Neolithic Western Europe through serial coalescent simulations.通过连续合并模拟研究新石器时代西欧的线粒体DNA关系。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):388-392. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.180. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
2
Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East.对古代近东地区农业起源的基因组学洞察。
Nature. 2016 Aug 25;536(7617):419-24. doi: 10.1038/nature19310. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans.来自欧洲各地的早期农民是新石器时代爱琴海人的直系后裔。
线粒体 DNA 单倍群 K 可降低欧洲人群自闭症谱系障碍风险。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;63(8):835-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.09.550. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Neolithic expansion and the 17q21.31 inversion in Iberia: an evolutionary approach to H2 haplotype distribution in the Near East and Europe.新石器时代的扩张和伊比利亚半岛的 17q21.31 倒位:对近东和欧洲 H2 单倍型分布的进化方法。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2023 Jan;298(1):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s00438-022-01969-0. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Ancient mitochondrial diversity reveals population homogeneity in Neolithic Greece and identifies population dynamics along the Danubian expansion axis.古代线粒体多样性揭示了新石器时代希腊人口的同质性,并确定了多瑙河扩张轴沿线的人口动态。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 5;12(1):13474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16745-8.
6
Genomic and dietary discontinuities during the Mesolithic and Neolithic in Sicily.西西里岛中石器时代和新石器时代的基因组与饮食差异
iScience. 2022 Apr 12;25(5):104244. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104244. eCollection 2022 May 20.
7
A 5700 year-old human genome and oral microbiome from chewed birch pitch.五千七百年前人类基因组与咀嚼桦树皮中的口腔微生物组。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 17;10(1):5520. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13549-9.
8
Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa.评估文化扩散在班图人向东南非扩散中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0215573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215573. eCollection 2019.
9
Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia.估算新石器时代在斯堪的纳维亚传播过程中,人群迁徙和文化传播的相对重要性。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):20180597. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0597.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 21;113(25):6886-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523951113. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
The genetic history of Ice Age Europe.冰河时代欧洲的基因史。
Nature. 2016 Jun 9;534(7606):200-5. doi: 10.1038/nature17993. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
Can a linguistic serial founder effect originating in Africa explain the worldwide phonemic cline?起源于非洲的语言连续奠基者效应能否解释全球音位渐变群?
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Apr;13(117). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0185.
6
Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians.230名古代欧亚人的全基因组选择模式
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):499-503. doi: 10.1038/nature16152. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
A Common Genetic Origin for Early Farmers from Mediterranean Cardial and Central European LBK Cultures.地中海卡迪尔文化和中欧线性陶文化早期农民的共同遗传起源。
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Dec;32(12):3132-42. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv181. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe.人口和文化传播推动了新石器时代的转变在欧洲不同地区的传播。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 May 6;12(106). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0166.
9
Tracing the genetic origin of Europe's first farmers reveals insights into their social organization.追溯欧洲首批农民的基因起源能揭示他们社会组织的相关情况。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 22;282(1805). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0339.
10
Ancient DNA analysis of 8000 B.C. near eastern farmers supports an early neolithic pioneer maritime colonization of Mainland Europe through Cyprus and the Aegean Islands.对公元前8000年近东农民的古DNA分析支持了新石器时代早期先驱者经塞浦路斯和爱琴海诸岛对欧洲大陆进行海上殖民的观点。
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jun 5;10(6):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004401. eCollection 2014 Jun.