Suppr超能文献

皮肤科医生调查:浅部真菌感染的诊断——用于启动治疗和评估疗效的方法有哪些,还需要哪些方法?

A survey among dermatologists: diagnostics of superficial fungal infections - what is used and what is needed to initiate therapy and assess efficacy?

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Health Sciences Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):421-427. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15361. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superficial fungal infections are common. It is important to confirm the clinical diagnosis by mycological laboratory methods before initiating systemic antifungal treatment, especially as antifungal sensitivity and in vitro susceptibility may differ between different genera and species. For many years, the gold standard for diagnosis of superficial fungal infections has been direct fungal detection in the clinical specimen (microscopy) supplemented by culturing. Lately, newer molecular based methods for fungal identification have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

This study was initiated to focus on the current usage of mycological diagnostics for superficial fungal infections by dermatologists. It was designed to investigate whether it was necessary to differentiate between initial diagnostic tests and those used at treatment follow-up in specific superficial fungal infections.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was distributed among members of the EADV mycology Task Force and other dermatologists with a special interest in mycology and nail disease.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 62 dermatologists of whom 38 (61%) completed the whole survey, 7 (11%) partially completed and 17 (27%) did not respond. Nearly, all respondents (82-100%) said that ideally they would use the result of direct microscopy (or histology) combined with a genus/species directed treatment of onychomycosis, dermatophytosis, Candida- and Malassezia-related infections. The majority of the dermatologists used a combination of clinical assessment and direct microscopy for treatment assessment and the viability of the fungus was considered more important at this visit than when initiating the treatment. Molecular based methods were not available for all responders.

CONCLUSION

The available diagnostic methods are heterogeneous and their usage differs between different practices as well as between countries. The survey confirmed that dermatologists find it important to make a mycological diagnosis, particularly prior to starting oral antifungal treatment in order to confirm the diagnose and target the therapy according to genus and species.

摘要

背景

浅部真菌感染很常见。在开始全身抗真菌治疗之前,通过真菌学实验室方法确认临床诊断非常重要,特别是因为不同属和种之间的抗真菌敏感性和体外药敏可能不同。多年来,浅部真菌感染的金标准诊断一直是临床标本(显微镜检查)直接真菌检测,辅以培养。最近,已经开发出了用于真菌鉴定的新型分子基础方法。

目的

本研究旨在关注皮肤科医生目前对浅部真菌感染的真菌学诊断的应用。它旨在调查在特定浅部真菌感染中是否有必要区分初始诊断测试和治疗随访中使用的测试。

方法

向 EADV 真菌学工作组的成员以及对真菌学和指甲疾病特别感兴趣的其他皮肤科医生分发了在线问卷。

结果

该调查分发给 62 名皮肤科医生,其中 38 名(61%)完成了整个调查,7 名(11%)部分完成,17 名(27%)未回复。几乎所有的受访者(82-100%)表示,理想情况下,他们将使用直接显微镜检查(或组织学)的结果,结合针对甲真菌病、皮肤癣菌病、念珠菌和马拉色菌相关感染的属/种定向治疗。大多数皮肤科医生在治疗评估中使用临床评估和直接显微镜检查的组合,并且在此次就诊时真菌的活力比开始治疗时更重要。并非所有受访者都可使用基于分子的方法。

结论

现有的诊断方法具有异质性,其使用方法在不同的实践以及国家之间存在差异。该调查证实,皮肤科医生认为进行真菌学诊断很重要,特别是在开始口服抗真菌治疗之前,以便根据属和种确认诊断并靶向治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验