Department Cell and Developmental Biology, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Present Address: Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Nov 23;18(Suppl 1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1291-8.
In African tsetse flies Glossina, spp. detection of bacterial symbionts such as Wolbachia is challenging since their prevalence and distribution are patchy, and natural symbiont titers can range at levels far below detection limit of standard molecular techniques. Reliable estimation of symbiont infection frequency, especially with regard to interrelations between symbionts and their potential impact on host biology, is of pivotal interest in the context of future applications for the control and eradication of Glossina-vectored African trypanosomosis. The presence or absence of symbionts is routinely screened with endpoint polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which has numerous advantages, but reaches its limits, when detecting infections at natural low titer. To not only determine presence of native tsetse symbionts but also to localize them to specific host tissues, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be applied. However, classic FISH assays may not detect low-titer infections due to limitations in sensitivity.
We have compared classic endpoint PCR with high-sensitivity blot-PCR. We demonstrate that the latter technique allows for clear detection of low-titer Wolbachia in the morsitans and palpalis groups while classic endpoint PCR does not. In order to localize Wolbachia in situ in high and low-titer Glossina species, we applied high-end Stellaris® rRNA-FISH. We show that with this high sensitivity method, even low amounts of Wolbachia can be traced in specific tissues. Furthermore, we highlight that more tissues and organs than previously recorded are infested with Wolbachia in subspecies of the morsitans and palpalis groups.
Our results demonstrate that overall symbiont infection frequencies as well as the presence in specific host tissues may be underestimated when using low-sensitivity methods. To better understand the complex interrelation of tsetse flies and their native symbionts plus the pathogenic trypanosomes, it is important to consider application of a broader range of high-sensitivity detection tools.
在非洲采采蝇属 Glossina 中,由于细菌共生体如 Wolbachia 的流行率和分布不均,以及自然共生体的滴度可能远低于标准分子技术的检测限,因此检测共生体具有挑战性。可靠估计共生体感染频率,特别是共生体之间的相互关系及其对宿主生物学的潜在影响,对于未来控制和根除采采蝇传播的非洲锥虫病具有重要意义。共生体的存在与否通常通过终点聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行筛查,该方法具有许多优点,但在检测自然低滴度感染时,也会达到其极限。为了不仅确定本地采采蝇共生体的存在,还要将其定位到特定的宿主组织,可应用荧光原位杂交(FISH)。然而,由于灵敏度的限制,经典的 FISH 检测可能无法检测低滴度感染。
我们比较了经典的终点 PCR 和高灵敏度印迹 PCR。我们证明,后者技术可以清晰地检测到 morsitans 和 palpalis 组中的低滴度 Wolbachia,而经典的终点 PCR 则无法检测到。为了在高滴度和低滴度 Glossina 物种中对 Wolbachia 进行原位定位,我们应用了高端 Stellaris® rRNA-FISH。我们表明,即使 Wolbachia 的含量很低,这种高灵敏度方法也可以追踪到特定组织。此外,我们强调,与以前记录的相比,morsitans 和 palpalis 组的亚种中有更多的组织和器官受到 Wolbachia 的侵袭。
我们的结果表明,当使用低灵敏度方法时,总体共生体感染频率以及在特定宿主组织中的存在可能被低估。为了更好地理解采采蝇及其本地共生体与致病性锥虫之间的复杂相互关系,考虑应用更广泛的高灵敏度检测工具非常重要。