Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London.
Department of Psychology, King's College London.
Psychol Bull. 2018 Dec;144(12):1229-1246. doi: 10.1037/bul0000171.
Exposure to bullying victimization is associated with a wide-range of short and long-term adverse outcomes. However, the extent to which these associations reflect a causal influence of bullying victimization remains disputed. Here, we aimed to provide the most stringent evidence regarding the consequences of bullying victimization by meta-analyzing all relevant quasi-experimental (QE) studies. Multilevel random effects models and metaregression were employed to (a) estimate the pooled QE-adjusted effect size (Cohen d) for bullying victimization on outcomes and to (b) evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 16 studies were included. We derived 101 QE-estimates from three different methods (twin design, fixed effects analysis, and propensity score matching) for three pools of outcomes (internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, academic difficulties). QE-adjusted effects were small for internalizing symptoms (dadjusted = 0.27, 95% CI [0.05, 0.49]), and smaller for externalizing symptoms (dadjusted = 0.15, 95% CI [0.10, 0.21]) and academic difficulties (dadjusted = 0.10, 95% CI [0.06, 0.13]). Accounting for a shared rater effect between the exposure and the outcome further reduced the effect for internalizing (dnonshared rater = 0.14, 95% CI [0.05, 0.23]) and externalizing symptoms (dnonshared rater = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.11]). Finally, the adverse effects declined in the long-term, most markedly for internalizing symptoms (dlong-term = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.13]). Based on the most stringent evidence available to date, findings indicate that bullying victimization may causally impact children's wellbeing in the short-term, especially anxiety and depression levels. The reduction of adverse effects over time highlights the potential for resilience in individuals who have experienced bullying. Secondary preventive interventions in bullied children should therefore focus on resilience and address children's preexisting vulnerabilities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
遭受欺凌与广泛的短期和长期不良后果有关。然而,这些关联在多大程度上反映了欺凌受害的因果影响仍存在争议。在这里,我们旨在通过对所有相关的准实验(QE)研究进行荟萃分析,提供关于欺凌受害后果的最严格证据。多水平随机效应模型和元回归用于(a)估计欺凌受害对结果的汇总 QE 调整效应大小(Cohen d),以及(b)评估异质性的潜在来源。共纳入 16 项研究。我们从三种不同的方法(双胞胎设计、固定效应分析和倾向评分匹配)为三个结果池(内化症状、外化症状、学业困难)得出了 101 个 QE 估计值。QE 调整后的效应对于内化症状较小(dadjusted = 0.27, 95% CI [0.05, 0.49]),对于外化症状(dadjusted = 0.15, 95% CI [0.10, 0.21])和学业困难(dadjusted = 0.10, 95% CI [0.06, 0.13])较小。考虑到暴露和结果之间的共享评估者效应进一步降低了内化症状的影响(dnonshared rater = 0.14, 95% CI [0.05, 0.23])和外化症状的影响(dnonshared rater = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.11])。最后,不良影响在长期内下降,内化症状最为明显(dlong-term = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.13])。基于迄今为止最严格的证据,研究结果表明,欺凌受害可能会在短期内对儿童的幸福感产生因果影响,特别是焦虑和抑郁水平。随着时间的推移,不良影响的减少突出了经历过欺凌的个体的潜在韧性。因此,受欺凌儿童的二级预防干预措施应侧重于韧性,并解决儿童的固有脆弱性。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。