Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5041, Australia.
Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1309-1317. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4049-6. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus is undertaken to detect dysplasia and early cancer, and to facilitate early intervention. Evidence supporting current practice is of low quality and often influenced by opinion. This study investigated the preferences of patients for surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus in an Australian cohort.
Four Barrett's oesophagus surveillance characteristics/attributes were evaluated within a discrete choice experiment based on literature and expert opinion: (1) surveillance method (endoscopy vs a blood test vs a novel breath test), (2) risk of missing a cancer over a 10-year period, (3) screening interval, and (4) out-of-pocket cost. The data from the discrete choice experiment was analysed within the framework of random utility theory using a mixed logit regression model.
The study sample comprised patients (n = 71) undergoing endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus of whom n = 65 completed the discrete choice experiment. The sample was predominantly male (77%) with average age of 65 years. All attributes except surveillance method significantly influenced respondents' preference for Barrett's oesophagus surveillance. Policy analyses suggested that compared to the reference case (i.e. endoscopy provided annually at no upfront cost and with a 4% risk of missing cancer), increasing test sensitivity to 0.5% risk of missing cancer would increase participation by up to 50%; surveillance every 5 years would lead to 26% reduction, while every 3 to 3.5 years would result in 7% increase in participation. Respondents were highly averse to paying A$500 for the test, resulting in 48% reduction in participation. None of the other surveillance methods was preferred to endoscopy, both resulting in 11% reduction in participation.
Test sensitivity, test frequency and out-of-pocket cost were the key factors influencing surveillance uptake. Patients prefer a test with the highest sensitivity, offered frequently, that incurs no upfront costs.
对巴雷特食管进行内镜监测是为了检测异型增生和早期癌症,并便于早期干预。支持当前实践的证据质量较低,并且常常受到意见的影响。本研究调查了澳大利亚队列中患者对巴雷特食管监测的偏好。
在基于文献和专家意见的离散选择实验中,评估了巴雷特食管监测的四个特征/属性:(1)监测方法(内镜检查与血液检查与新型呼吸测试),(2)在 10 年内错过癌症的风险,(3)筛查间隔,以及(4)自付费用。离散选择实验的数据在随机效用理论框架内使用混合对数回归模型进行分析。
研究样本包括正在接受巴雷特食管内镜监测的患者(n=71),其中 n=65 人完成了离散选择实验。该样本主要为男性(77%),平均年龄为 65 岁。除监测方法外,所有属性均显著影响受访者对巴雷特食管监测的偏好。政策分析表明,与参考案例(即每年提供内镜检查,无需预付费用,且错过癌症的风险为 4%)相比,将检测灵敏度提高到 0.5%错过癌症的风险将使参与度增加多达 50%;每 5 年进行一次监测将导致参与度降低 26%,而每 3 至 3.5 年进行一次监测将使参与度增加 7%。受访者非常不愿意支付 500 澳元的检测费用,这导致参与度降低了 48%。没有任何其他监测方法优于内镜检查,这两种方法均导致参与度降低了 11%。
检测灵敏度、检测频率和自付费用是影响监测参与度的关键因素。患者更喜欢具有最高灵敏度、频繁提供且不产生预付费用的检测方法。