Zelazowska-Rutkowska Beata, Zak Janusz, Wojtkowska Malgorzata, Zaworonek Justyna, Cylwik Bogdan
Department of Pediatric Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Mar;33(3):e22822. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22822. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Routine analysis of pleocytosis and cellular composition of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is carried out with a phase-contrast microscope. The use of hematological analyzers seems to be an alternative to the manual method. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the automated technique for counting and differentiating CSF cells in children.
The study group consisted of 59 children (28 girls and 31 boys) aged from 4 to 17 years suffering from viral and bacterial meningitis. Children were divided into three subgroups according to CSF cell count: 1st group had a pleocytosis of 6-50 cells/µL, 2nd group-51-100 cells/µL, and 3rd group->100 cells/µL. A reference group involved 32 children (17 girls and 15 boys) aged from 2 to 18 years with a normal range of 0-5 cells/µL. Examination of CSF was performed in parallel by two different method, manual and automated.
The analysis of pleocytosis revealed that the values obtained by the manual method were statistically significantly lower in relation to the values obtained by automated technique in subgroups I and II. The number of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells in subgroups I, II, and III determined by both manual and automated methods was comparable.
We conclude that automated method cannot fully replace the previously used manual method and some of the dubious cases, such as samples with low pleocytosis rates or abnormal cells indicated by the analyzer, will still require microscopic examination.
脑脊液(CSF)细胞增多症和细胞组成的常规分析是使用相差显微镜进行的。血液分析仪的使用似乎是手工方法的一种替代方法。本研究的目的是评估自动化技术对儿童脑脊液细胞计数和鉴别诊断的实用性。
研究组由59名年龄在4至17岁之间患有病毒性和细菌性脑膜炎的儿童组成(28名女孩和31名男孩)。根据脑脊液细胞计数将儿童分为三个亚组:第一组细胞增多症为6 - 50个细胞/微升,第二组为51 - 100个细胞/微升,第三组>100个细胞/微升。对照组包括32名年龄在2至18岁之间脑脊液细胞计数在正常范围0 - 5个细胞/微升的儿童(17名女孩和15名男孩)。脑脊液检查通过两种不同方法并行进行,即手工方法和自动化方法。
细胞增多症分析显示,在亚组I和II中,手工方法获得的值与自动化技术获得的值相比在统计学上显著更低。通过手工和自动化方法确定的亚组I、II和III中的单核细胞和多形核细胞数量相当。
我们得出结论,自动化方法不能完全取代先前使用的手工方法,一些可疑病例,如细胞增多率低的样本或分析仪指示的异常细胞,仍需要显微镜检查。