Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, 81366 München, Germany.
Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Cells. 2021 May 18;10(5):1232. doi: 10.3390/cells10051232.
The analysis of cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a routine procedure that is usually performed manually using the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber and cell microscopy for cell counting and differentiation. In order to reduce the requirement for manual assessment, automated analyses by devices mainly used for blood cell analysis have been also used for CSF samples. Here, we summarize the current state of investigations using these automated devices and critically review their limitations. Despite technical improvements, the lower limit for reliable leukocyte counts in the CSF is still at approximately 20 cells/µL, to be validated depending on the device. Since the critical range for clinical decisions is in the range of 5-30 cells/µL this implies that cell numbers < 30/µL require a manual confirmation. Moreover, the lower limit of reliable erythrocyte detection by automated devices is at approximately 1000/µL. However, even low erythrocyte numbers may be of clinical importance. In contrast, heavily hemorrhagic samples from neurosurgery may be counted automatically at an acceptable precision more quickly. Finally, cell differentiation by automated devices provides only a rough orientation for lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes. Other diagnostically important cell types such as tumor cells, siderophages, blasts and others are not reliably detected. Thus, although the automation may give a gross estimate sufficient for the emergency room situation, each CSF requires a manual microscopy for cytological evaluation for the final report. In conclusion, although automated analysis of CSF cells may provide a first orientation of the cell profile in an individual sample, an additional manual cell count and a microscopic cytology are still required and represent the gold standard.
对脑脊液(CSF)中的细胞进行分析是一种常规程序,通常使用福克-罗森塔尔(Fuchs-Rosenthal)室和细胞显微镜手动进行,以进行细胞计数和分类。为了减少手动评估的需求,也已经使用主要用于血细胞分析的自动化设备对 CSF 样本进行了自动分析。在这里,我们总结了使用这些自动化设备进行的当前研究状态,并对其局限性进行了批判性评估。尽管技术有所改进,但 CSF 中可靠白细胞计数的下限仍约为 20 个/µL,还需根据设备进行验证。由于临床决策的关键范围在 5-30 个/µL 之间,这意味着细胞数 < 30/µL 需要手动确认。此外,自动化设备可靠检测红细胞的下限约为 1000/µL。然而,即使红细胞数量较低也可能具有临床意义。相比之下,来自神经外科的少量出血样本可以更快地以可接受的精度自动进行计数。最后,自动化设备的细胞分类仅为淋巴细胞、粒细胞和单核细胞提供粗略的定位。其他具有诊断意义的细胞类型,如肿瘤细胞、含铁血黄素细胞、原始细胞等,无法可靠检测。因此,尽管自动化可以为急诊室情况提供足够的大致估计,但每份 CSF 仍需要进行手动显微镜检查,以进行细胞形态学评估,作为最终报告。总之,尽管 CSF 细胞的自动化分析可能提供单个样本中细胞特征的初步方向,但仍需要额外的手动细胞计数和显微镜细胞学检查,它们代表金标准。