• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转基因食品标签政策:是前进还是后退?

Genetically Modified Labeling Policies: Moving Forward or Backward?

作者信息

Borges Bárbara Juliana Pinheiro, Arantes Olivia Márcia Nagy, Fernandes Antonio Alberto Ribeiro, Broach James R, Fernandes Patricia Machado Bueno

机构信息

Biotechnology Group, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.

Retired, Londrina, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 27;6:181. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00181. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00181
PMID:30538985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6277523/
Abstract

One of the priorities to address food security is to increase the access of farmers to biotechnology, through the application of scientific advances, such as genetically modified organisms and food (GMF). However, the spread of (mis)information about their safety strengthens the clamor for mandatory GMF labeling. This paper provides an overview of food labeling policies, considering the principles suggested by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, and analyzes the consequences for the world food security of the Brazilian labeling policies compared to developed countries. We discuss the discriminatory application of GMF mandatory labeling in the absence of any scientific evidence as it has the potential of causing social harm and jeopardizes research, production, and distribution of food and consumers' right to information.

摘要

解决粮食安全问题的优先事项之一是通过应用科学进步,如转基因生物和食品(GMF),增加农民获得生物技术的机会。然而,关于其安全性的(错误)信息传播加剧了对转基因食品强制标签的呼声。本文根据食品法典委员会提出的原则概述了食品标签政策,并分析了巴西标签政策与发达国家相比对世界粮食安全的影响。我们讨论了在没有任何科学证据的情况下转基因食品强制标签的歧视性应用,因为它有可能造成社会危害,并危及食品的研究、生产和分销以及消费者的知情权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c0/6277523/3d3728fb0108/fbioe-06-00181-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c0/6277523/264b2b6c64d2/fbioe-06-00181-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c0/6277523/3d3728fb0108/fbioe-06-00181-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c0/6277523/264b2b6c64d2/fbioe-06-00181-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c0/6277523/3d3728fb0108/fbioe-06-00181-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetically Modified Labeling Policies: Moving Forward or Backward?转基因食品标签政策:是前进还是后退?
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 27;6:181. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00181. eCollection 2018.
2
Predicament of Chinese legislation on genetically modified food (GMF) labeling management and solutions - from the perspective of the new food safety law.中国转基因食品标识管理立法困境与解决对策——基于新食品安全法视角
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Nov;97(14):4737-4743. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8342. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
Scientific issues related to Codex Alimentarius goals: a review of principles, with examples.与食品法典目标相关的科学问题:原则综述,附实例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;60(1):161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
4
The origins of a global standard for food quality and safety: Codex Alimentarius Austriacus and FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius.全球食品质量与安全标准的起源:《奥地利食品法典》与粮农组织/世界卫生组织《食品法典》。
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2012 Jun;82(3):223-7. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000115.
5
Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.识别具有潜在致敏性的食物蛋白:安全评估方法的演变及提供更多工具的研究
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;54(3 Suppl):S2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
6
Effects of information on young consumers' willingness to pay for genetically modified food: experimental auction analysis.信息对年轻消费者购买转基因食品支付意愿的影响:实验拍卖分析
Ecol Food Nutr. 2014;53(3):292-311. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2013.824433.
7
Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.四个非洲国家生物技术使用和生物安全规定案例研究。
J Biotechnol. 2011 Dec 20;156(4):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
Codex Alimentarius commission on ensuring food safety and promoting fair trade: harmonization of standards between Korea and codex.食品法典委员会关于确保食品安全和促进公平贸易:韩国与食品法典标准的协调统一
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Aug 31;30(9):1151-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10068-021-00943-7. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Assuring food safety: the complementary tasks and standards of the World Organisation for Animal Health and the Codex Alimentarius Commission.确保食品安全:世界动物卫生组织与食品法典委员会的互补任务和标准
Rev Sci Tech. 2006 Aug;25(2):813-21.
10
Codex Alimentarius: food quality and safety standards for international trade.《食品法典》:国际贸易中的食品质量与安全标准。
Rev Sci Tech. 1997 Aug;16(2):313-21. doi: 10.20506/rst.16.2.1019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the adoption and application of the Namibian biosafety labelling regulations and determining their impact on Namibian food and feed importers.评估纳米比亚生物安全标签法规的采用和应用情况,并确定其对纳米比亚食品和饲料进口商的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jul 6;11:1224992. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1224992. eCollection 2023.
2
Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.用于可持续增强粮食生产系统的转基因作物。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 8;13:1027828. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1027828. eCollection 2022.
3
Familiarity in the Context of Risk Assessment of Transgenic Crops: Focus on Some Countries in the Americas.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of genetically modified crops and pesticides in Brazil: growing hazards.巴西转基因作物和杀虫剂的使用:危害与日俱增。
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Oct;22(10):3333-3339. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172210.17112017.
2
The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.欧盟关于“转基因生物”的立法:在无稽之谈与保护主义之间——一场持续不断的熊彼特式公共选择链条。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):57-73. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270488. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015: Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO, 2015.
转基因作物风险评估背景下的熟悉度:聚焦美洲部分国家
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jan 28;7:463. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00463. eCollection 2019.
联合国粮食及农业组织、国际农业发展基金和世界粮食计划署。《2015年世界粮食不安全状况:实现2015年国际饥饿目标:评估进展不均衡情况》。罗马:联合国粮食及农业组织,2015年。
Adv Nutr. 2015 Sep;6(5):623-4. doi: 10.3945/an.115.009936.
4
Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.终结转基因作物基于事件的监管。
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):474-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3541.
5
A Study of Stakeholder Views to Shape a Communication Strategy for GMO in Brazil.巴西转基因生物沟通策略制定的利益相关者观点研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Nov 9;3:179. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00179. eCollection 2015.
6
Attitudes in China about Crops and Foods Developed by Biotechnology.中国人对生物技术培育的作物和食品的态度。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0139114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139114. eCollection 2015.
7
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.公众对植物生物技术和转基因作物的接受程度。
Viruses. 2015 Jul 30;7(8):4254-81. doi: 10.3390/v7082819.
8
SCIENCE POLICY. U.S. to review agricultural biotech regulations.科学政策。美国将审查农业生物技术法规。
Science. 2015 Jul 10;349(6244):131. doi: 10.1126/science.349.6244.131.
9
Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.致命的吸引力:对转基因食品反对的直观诉求。
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jul;20(7):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Labeling for better or worse.无论好坏的标签。
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Dec;32(12):1180-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3087.