Soares Panmela, Martinelli Suellen Secchi, Fabri Rafaela Karen, Veiros Marcela Boro, Davó-Blanes Mari Carmen, Cavalli Suzi Barletto
Departamento de Enfermeria Comunitária, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia, Universidad de Alicante. Ctra. Alicante/San Vicente S/N, San Vicente. 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig Espanha.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição, Departamento de Nutrição, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis SC Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Dec;23(12):4189-4197. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182312.25582016.
This study aimed to analyze the financial investment used for the procurement of food for the Brazilian National School Food Program (PNAE) in a city in the South of Brazil. The bidding process, the public calls and accountability reports of the PNAE were analyzed in the following variables: I) municipal financial complementation values; II) percentage of resources used to purchase foods from Family Farmer (FF), and Recommended, Restricted, Prohibited and others foods. The comparison of proportions was employed as a test to identify differences between investments. The municipal financial complementation was 65% of the total. The total amount used to purchase foods was distributed as follows: 65.5% for the Recommended, 27.9% for the Restricted, 6.5% for the Other and 0% for the Prohibited. The expenditure on Recommended foods was higher (p < 0.001) compared to the remaining groups. FF provided only Recommended foods, representing 12.1% of total (municipality and federal) expenditure and 29.5% of total federal funds. The direct purchase from FF contributed to the purchase of recommended foods. The municipal financial complementation was not geared to FA, which can compromise the potential of the school food program to promote healthy and sustainable food systems.
本研究旨在分析巴西南部某城市用于巴西国家学校食品计划（PNAE）食品采购的财政投资情况。对PNAE的招标过程、公开招标和问责报告进行了如下变量分析：I）市级财政补充金额；II）用于从家庭农民（FF）购买食品以及推荐、受限、禁止和其他食品的资源百分比。采用比例比较作为检验方法来确定投资之间的差异。市级财政补充占总额的65%。用于食品采购的总金额分配如下：推荐食品占65.5%，受限食品占27.9%，其他食品占6.5%，禁止食品占0%。与其他组相比，推荐食品的支出更高（p < 0.001）。FF仅提供推荐食品，占总支出（市级和联邦）的12.1%，占联邦资金总额的29.5%。直接从FF采购有助于推荐食品的购买。市级财政补充并未针对家庭农业，这可能会损害学校食品计划促进健康和可持续食品系统的潜力。
