• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚丙烯网片与Sepramesh®网片上的粘连:一项大鼠实验研究。

Adhesions on polypropylene versus Sepramesh® meshes: an experimental study in rats.

作者信息

Biondo-Simões Maria de Lourdes Pessole, Pessini Victor Cezar de Azevedo, Porto Pedro Henrique Caldeira, Robes Rogério Ribeiro

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Cirurgia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018 Dec 10;45(6):e2040. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20182040.

DOI:10.1590/0100-6991e-20182040
PMID:30540100
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to compare the formation of induced intraperitoneal adhesions in rats when using polypropylene and Sepramesh® meshes.

METHODS

we used 20 male Wistar rats, randomly grouped in two groups of ten animals each. We arranged two 10x20mm meshes intraperitoneally into each animal, one being the polypropylene (PP), and the other, Sepramesh®. In Group 1, the polypropylene mesh was positioned to the right, and the Sepramesh®, to the left. In Group 2, the meshes' layout was reversed. After 14 days of the procedure, we euthanized the animals and analyzed the incorporation and percentages of adhesions macroscopically in each mesh. We submitted the collected data to statistical analysis with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05).

RESULTS

all meshes showed adhesions. In the Sepramesh® ones, the percentage of surface covered by adhesions ranged from 2% to 86%, with a mean of 18.6±18.6%, while in the polypropylene meshes, it varied between 6% and 86%, with an average of 57.4%±34.9% (p<0.05). The preferred adhesion sites on both meshes were the edges.

CONCLUSION

although no mesh was able to completely inhibit the development of adhesions, the Sepramesh® mesh presented less adhesions to the polypropylene mesh. The most common sites of adhesion formation were the edges of the prosthesis, which evidences the importance of the adequate fixation of the meshes.

摘要

目的

比较使用聚丙烯网片和Sepramesh®网片时大鼠诱导性腹腔粘连的形成情况。

方法

我们使用了20只雄性Wistar大鼠,随机分为两组,每组10只动物。我们将两片10×20mm的网片腹腔内植入每只动物体内,一片为聚丙烯(PP)网片,另一片为Sepramesh®网片。在第1组中,聚丙烯网片置于右侧,Sepramesh®网片置于左侧。在第2组中,网片的布局相反。手术14天后,我们对动物实施安乐死,并宏观分析每个网片上粘连的形成情况及百分比。我们将收集到的数据进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%(p<0.05)。

结果

所有网片均出现粘连。在Sepramesh®网片上,粘连覆盖的表面百分比在2%至86%之间,平均为18.6±18.6%,而在聚丙烯网片上,该百分比在6%至86%之间,平均为57.4%±34.9%(p<0.05)。两片网片上粘连的首选部位均为边缘。

结论

尽管没有网片能够完全抑制粘连的形成,但Sepramesh®网片的粘连情况比聚丙烯网片少。粘连形成最常见的部位是假体边缘,这证明了网片妥善固定的重要性。

相似文献

1
Adhesions on polypropylene versus Sepramesh® meshes: an experimental study in rats.聚丙烯网片与Sepramesh®网片上的粘连:一项大鼠实验研究。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018 Dec 10;45(6):e2040. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20182040.
2
Sepramesh and postoperative peritoneal adhesions in a rat model.大鼠模型中的Sepramesh与术后腹膜粘连
Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Dec;116(6):357-361. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1181322. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model.预防与人工合成补片的粘连:使用切口疝模型比较不同屏障材料
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):123-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00017.
4
Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.聚丙烯与 Parietex composite®、Vicryl® 和 Ultrapro® 补片在腹膜内粘连形成方面的比较研究。
Acta Cir Bras. 2017 Feb;32(2):98-107. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020170202.
5
Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.用于疝气修补的涂层补片在预防腹腔内粘连方面效果相当。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4202-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3021-5. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
6
Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair.腹膜与人工合成材料的粘连:切口疝修补术补片的选择
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):960-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640000180.
7
Comparative study of intraperitoneal adhesions associated with the use of meshes of polypropylene and polypropylene coated with omega-3 fatty acid.聚丙烯网片与涂有ω-3脂肪酸的聚丙烯网片使用相关的腹腔内粘连的比较研究。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):201-6.
8
Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.用于腹疝修补的新型人工补片的评估
Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1320-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0706-4. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
9
Effectiveness of the combined use of lactic acid film and polypropylene mesh in the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions--an experimental model in rats.乳酸膜与聚丙烯网联合使用在大鼠腹腔粘连形成中的有效性——一项大鼠实验模型研究
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2010 Oct;37(5):364-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912010000500010.
10
Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.腹疝修补术中粘连预防:一项比较三种推荐用于腹腔内使用的轻质多孔补片的实验研究。
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1541-3. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and Epidemiological Similarities, and Differences Between Postoperative Intraperitoneal Adhesion Development and Other Benign Fibro-proliferative Disorders.术后腹腔粘连形成与其他良性纤维增生性疾病的遗传和流行病学相似性和差异性。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Nov;29(11):3055-3077. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00726-9. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:腹腔镜 IPOM 仍是合理的方法吗?
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6. Epub 2019 Aug 27.