• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:腹腔镜 IPOM 仍是合理的方法吗?

Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.

出版信息

Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6
PMID:31456098
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ventral hernia repair has become a common procedure, but the way in which it is performed still depends on surgeon's skill, experience, and habit. The initial open approach is faced with extensive dissection and a high risk of infection and prolonged hospital stay. To tackle these problems, minimally invasive procedures are gaining interest. Several new techniques are emerging, but laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) is still the mainstay for many surgeons. We will discuss why laparoscopic IPOM is still a valuable approach in the treatment of primary non-complicated midline hernias and review the current literature.

METHODS

We performed a literature search across PubMed and MEDLINE using the following search terms: "Laparoscopic hernia repair", "Ventral hernia repair" and "Primary ventral hernia". Articles corresponding to these search terms were individually reviewed by the primary author and selected on relevance.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic IPOM still is a good approach for the efficient treatment of primary non-complicated midline hernias. Several techniques are emerging, but are faced with increased costs, technical difficulties, and low study patient volume. Further research is warranted to show superiority and applicability of these new techniques over laparoscopic IPOM, but until then laparoscopic IPOM should remain the go-to technique.

摘要

目的

腹疝修补术已成为一种常见的手术,但手术方式仍取决于外科医生的技能、经验和习惯。最初的开放式方法面临广泛的解剖和高感染风险以及住院时间延长的问题。为了解决这些问题,微创手术越来越受到关注。出现了几种新技术,但腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)仍然是许多外科医生的主要方法。我们将讨论为什么腹腔镜 IPOM 仍然是治疗原发性非复杂性中线疝的一种有价值的方法,并回顾当前的文献。

方法

我们在 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 上使用以下搜索词进行文献检索:“腹腔镜疝修补术”、“腹疝修补术”和“原发性腹疝”。主要作者对相应于这些搜索词的文章进行了单独审查,并根据相关性进行了选择。

结论

腹腔镜 IPOM 仍然是治疗原发性非复杂性中线疝的有效方法。出现了几种新技术,但面临着成本增加、技术困难和研究患者数量低的问题。需要进一步的研究来证明这些新技术相对于腹腔镜 IPOM 的优越性和适用性,但在此之前,腹腔镜 IPOM 仍应是首选技术。

相似文献

1
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:腹腔镜 IPOM 仍是合理的方法吗?
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Adhesiolysis-Related Challenges for Laparoscopic Procedures after Ventral Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Mesh.腹疝修补术中使用腹腔内补片后腹腔镜手术与粘连松解相关的挑战
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Jan-Feb;114(1):39-47. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.1.39.
3
A propensity-score matched analysis of ventral-TAPP vs. laparoscopic IPOM for small and mid-sized ventral hernias. Comparison of perioperative data, surgical outcome and cost-effectiveness.经倾向评分匹配的腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与腹腔镜腹膜外修补术(IPOM)治疗小型和中型腹疝的对比分析。比较围手术期数据、手术结果和成本效益。
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1521-1530. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02586-x. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh-results from a general surgical unit.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术加腹腔内补片-普通外科单元的结果。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1357-1362. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02012-9. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias.与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中小尺寸腹外疝相比,机器人辅助腹直肌后入路疝修补术(rRetrorectus)术后疼痛更少,住院时间更短。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Endoscopic retromuscular technique (eTEP) vs conventional laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair with defect closure (IPOM +) for midline hernias. A case-control study.内镜经肌入路技术(eTEP)与传统腹腔镜经腹或经腹正中切口疝修补术(IPOM+)治疗中线疝的对比:一项病例对照研究。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02373-0. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.腹腔镜修补中小尺寸中线腹疝时桥接与补片增强的效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4984-9. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
"Comparative safety and efficacy of robotic TAPP and IPOM techniques in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes".机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)和腹腔内网片修补术(IPOM)在腹疝修补中的安全性和疗效比较:短期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03454-0.
2
Evaluating the impact of diastasis recti on ipom plus ventral hernia repair.评估腹直肌分离对IPOM加腹疝修补术的影响。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 14;29(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03451-3.
3
Ventral Hernia Repair: A Journey from Laparoscopic to Robotic Surgery: Is Cost Efficiency Guaranteed?

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results.腹腔镜与杂交手术治疗切口疝的前瞻性随机多中心研究:1 年结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):88-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Laparoscopic Repair of Small Ventral Hernias Using the "Ventralex™ Hernia Patch".
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Jan-Feb;114(1):95-102. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.1.95.
3
Endoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular approach for ventral hernia repair.内镜增强视野完全腹膜外肌后入路治疗腹外疝。
腹疝修补术:从腹腔镜手术到机器人手术的历程:成本效益有保障吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 2;14(11):3909. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113909.
4
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.原发性腹直肌旁疝的腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM Plus)与扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修补术(eTEP-RS):一家三级医院50例病例的经验
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57678. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Are Surgeons Going to Be Left Holding the Bag? Incisional Hernia Repair and Intra-Peritoneal Non-Absorbable Mesh Implant Complications.外科医生会成为替罪羊吗?切口疝修补术与腹腔内不可吸收补片植入并发症
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 9;13(4):1005. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041005.
6
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
7
Experimental evaluation of the use of starch and carboxymethylcellulose in the prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions in hernia surgery with coated meshes.实验评估在疝手术中使用淀粉和羧甲基纤维素预防涂层网片导致的腹腔内粘连。
Acta Cir Bras. 2023 Sep 18;38:e383323. doi: 10.1590/acb383323. eCollection 2023.
8
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
9
Laparoscopic vs open repair for primary midline ventral hernia: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗原发性中线腹侧疝的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 8;408(1):300. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02958-6.
10
Surgical techniques and effectiveness of laparoscopic resection of abdominal wall desmoid-type fibromatosis and defect reconstruction: a single-center retrospective analysis.腹腔镜下腹壁硬纤维瘤病切除及缺损重建的手术技术和效果:单中心回顾性分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):211-222. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02839-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3749-3756. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06669-2. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients.腹腔镜 IPOM 与开放式下修补术治疗择期切口疝修补术的比较:基于注册的、倾向评分匹配的 9907 例患者比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06629-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Adhesions on polypropylene versus Sepramesh® meshes: an experimental study in rats.聚丙烯网片与Sepramesh®网片上的粘连:一项大鼠实验研究。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018 Dec 10;45(6):e2040. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20182040.
6
Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹壁手术:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1872-3. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
7
Mesh OR Patch for Hernia on Epigastric and Umbilical Sites (MORPHEUS-Trial): The Complete Two-year Follow-up.经腹和脐部疝修补用网片或补片(MORPHEUS 试验):完整的两年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):33-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003086.
8
Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve.机器人经腹肌后脐部人工材料疝修补术(TARUP):学习曲线期间手术时间的观察性研究
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1101-1111. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1825-x. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without defect closure: comparative analysis of a single-institution experience with 783 patients.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术加与不加缺损闭合:单机构783例患者经验的比较分析
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1061-1065. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1812-2. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
10
The Perfect Plane: A Systematic Review of Mesh Location and Outcomes, Update 2018.《理想的补片:补片位置和结局的系统评价,2018 年更新》。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3 Suppl):107S-116S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004864.