FGBU "St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology" of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia.
The St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Immunol Res. 2018 Dec;66(6):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-9052-1.
Clinical and radiological features of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis are quite overlapping, and therefore, a diagnostic dilemma often persists. There are no commonly accepted criteria for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis due to the lack of data on the etiology of the disease. The exclusion of tuberculosis in every patient with suspected sarcoidosis is a mandatory stage of diagnosis, especially in countries with a high burden of tuberculosis. A prospective study was conducted with two groups of patients: group I (n = 50)-patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis established according to standard criteria; group II (n = 28)-patients with pulmonary tuberculosis with bacterial excretion. The control group (n = 24) was presented by healthy subjects. The examination complex included x-ray, bacteriological, immunological (Mantoux test with 2 TE, TB.SPOT test), and histological methods. All patients and healthy subjects were assessed for immune complexes with the use of the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method and adding of "healthy lung tissue extract" antigens and specific tuberculosis antigens ESAT-6 and SFP-10 in vitro. Significant differences were found in determining specific immune complexes in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis and pulmonary tuberculosis. Registration of specific immune complex formation with "healthy lung tissue extract" in 100% cases may indicate the autoimmune nature of sarcoidosis. The absence of the immune complex formation in response to ESAT-6/SFP-10 antigens can be used for the differential diagnosis of two diseases. The diagnostic significance of the DLS method was 100% for sarcoidosis and 92.2% for tuberculosis. The data obtained in the study allows not only understanding the etiology of sarcoidosis, but also obtaining new criteria for the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and pulmonary sarcoidosis.
肺结核和结节病的临床和影像学特征非常相似,因此,诊断上常常存在难题。由于缺乏关于该疾病病因的数据,因此目前没有用于结节病诊断的公认标准。在每个疑似结节病患者中排除肺结核都是诊断的强制性阶段,尤其是在结核病负担高的国家。本研究纳入了两组患者:第一组(n=50)为根据标准标准确诊的肺结节病患者;第二组(n=28)为有细菌排泄的肺结核患者。对照组(n=24)为健康受试者。检查包括 X 射线、细菌学、免疫学(2TE 的曼图特测试、TB.SPOT 测试)和组织学方法。所有患者和健康受试者均使用动态光散射(DLS)方法进行免疫复合物评估,并在体外加入“健康肺组织提取物”抗原和特异性结核抗原 ESAT-6 和 SFP-10。在肺结节病和肺结核患者中,特异性免疫复合物的测定存在显著差异。在 100%的病例中,登记到与“健康肺组织提取物”形成的特异性免疫复合物可能表明结节病的自身免疫性质。对 ESAT-6/SFP-10 抗原无免疫复合物形成可用于两种疾病的鉴别诊断。DLS 方法的诊断意义在结节病中为 100%,在肺结核中为 92.2%。该研究获得的数据不仅可以了解结节病的病因,还可以获得鉴别诊断肺结核和肺结节病的新标准。