Suppr超能文献

上消化道出血患者中,国家早期预警评分+乳酸评分与内镜检查前Rockall评分、格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分及AIMS65评分的比较。

Comparison of the National Early Warning Score+Lactate score with the pre-endoscopic Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford, and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Kim Daejin, Jo Sion, Lee Jae Baek, Jin Youngho, Jeong Taeoh, Yoon Jaechol, Park Boyoung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University and Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;5(4):219-229. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.268. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the predictive value of the National Early Warning Score+Lactate (NEWS+L) score with those of other parameters such as the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PERS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and albumin, international normalized ratio, altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, age older than 65 years score (AIMS65) among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with UGIB during 2 consecutive years. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, intensive care unit admission, and the need for ≥5 packs of red blood cell transfusion within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Among 530 included patients, the composite outcome occurred in 59 patients (19 in-hospital deaths, 13 intensive care unit admissions, and 40 transfusions of ≥5 packs of red blood cells within 24 hours). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the NEWS+L score for the composite outcome was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.82), which demonstrated a significant difference compared to PERS (0.66, 0.59-0.73, P=0.004), but not to GBS (0.70, 0.64-0.77, P=0.141) and AIMS65 (0.76, 0.70-0.83, P=0.999). The sensitivities of NEWS+L scores of 3 (n=34, 6.4%), 4 (n=92, 17.4%), and 5 (n=171, 32.3%) were 100%, 98.3%, and 96.6%, respectively, while the sensitivity of an AIMS65 score of 0 (n=159, 30.0%) was 91.5%.

CONCLUSION

The NEWS+L score showed better discriminative performance than the PERS and comparable discriminative performance to the GBS and AIMS65. The NEWS+L score may be used to identify low-risk patients among patients with UGIB.

摘要

目的

我们比较了国家早期预警评分+乳酸(NEWS+L)评分与其他参数(如内镜检查前Rockall评分(PERS)、格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)以及白蛋白、国际标准化比值、精神状态改变、收缩压、65岁以上年龄评分(AIMS65))在上消化道出血(UGIB)患者中的预测价值。

方法

我们对连续两年的UGIB患者进行了一项回顾性研究。主要结局是院内死亡、重症监护病房入院以及24小时内需要输注≥5单位红细胞的综合情况。

结果

在纳入的530例患者中,59例患者出现了综合结局(19例院内死亡、13例重症监护病房入院以及40例在24小时内输注≥5单位红细胞)。NEWS+L评分对于综合结局的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.76(95%置信区间,0.70至0.82),与PERS(0.66,0.59 - 0.73,P = 0.004)相比有显著差异,但与GBS(0.70,0.64 - 0.77,P = 0.141)和AIMS65(0.76,0.70 - 0.83,P = 0.999)相比无显著差异。NEWS+L评分为3分(n = 34,6.4%)、4分(n = 92,17.4%)和5分(n = 171,32.3%)时的敏感度分别为100%、98.3%和96.6%,而AIMS65评分为0分(n = 159,30.0%)时的敏感度为91.5%。

结论

NEWS+L评分显示出比PERS更好的鉴别性能,与GBS和AIMS65的鉴别性能相当。NEWS+L评分可用于识别UGIB患者中的低风险患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f24/6301866/3f0a29a1ad58/ceem-17-268f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验