Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department and Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;118(9):1347-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess: 1) the impact of the HFS curriculum on residents' knowledge and skills, and 2) the correlation between learning outcomes and the clinical performance.
An HFS-based curriculum was implemented for junior residents prior to their ICU rotations. Residents completed written tests before (pre-test) and after (post-test) the curriculum and were assessed on their performance during the simulation sessions. Clinical performance was evaluated using global rating for knowledge, clinical skills, and leadership and decision-making skills.
Complete data on pre-, post-test, simulation performance assessment, and clinical performance evaluation were available for 69 residents. Residents scored higher on their written post-test (64.6) compared with the pre-test (57.0) (p < 0.01). The simulation performance of residents improved between their first (3.43) and second (3.60) sessions (p < 0.05). Post-test scores correlated poorly with simulation performance (r = 0.03-0.28). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that clinical performance correlated better and significantly with simulation performance than the post-test for knowledge and clinical skills.
HFS is an effective training strategy, and can also be a complementary assessment tool to the written examinations and has better correlation with clinical performance.
背景/目的:本研究旨在评估:1)HFs 课程对住院医师知识和技能的影响,以及 2)学习成果与临床表现之间的相关性。
在住院医师进入 ICU 轮转之前,为其实施基于 HFS 的课程。住院医师在课程前后(预测试和后测试)完成书面测试,并在模拟会议期间评估其表现。临床表现通过全球评估来评估知识、临床技能、领导力和决策技能。
共有 69 名住院医师完整记录了预测试、后测试、模拟表现评估和临床表现评估的数据。住院医师的书面后测试(64.6)得分高于预测试(57.0)(p<0.01)。住院医师的模拟表现从第一次(3.43)和第二次(3.60)会议之间有所提高(p<0.05)。后测试分数与模拟表现的相关性较差(r=0.03-0.28)。多变量线性回归分析表明,与书面考试相比,临床表现与模拟表现的相关性更好且更显著,与知识和临床技能的相关性也更好。
HFs 是一种有效的培训策略,也可以作为书面考试的补充评估工具,与临床表现的相关性更好。