Querido Sophie, van den Broek Sjoukje, de Rond Marlies, Wigersma Lode, Ten Cate Olle
Central Board for Specialty training for Elderly Care Medicine in the Netherlands (SOON), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht, Medical School, The Netherlands.
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Dec 27;9:332-339. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5c14.de75.
To gain insight into factors affecting career preference and career choice during the final phase of medical school, above and beyond a model that was presented by Bland and colleagues in 1995 (the "Bland model").
A qualitative study was conducted. One-hour semi-structured interviews were conducted with final-year medical students about career preference and the factors influencing preference and choice. The interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was applied, to identify patterns and interrelationships in the data and to compare and contrast these with the Bland model.
Twenty-four students participated. Three critical sets of factors, not present in the Bland model, emerged from the interviews: (a) factors arising from student-initiated information collection, (b) patient population characteristics of a specialty domain, and (c) the characteristics of teams and colleagues within a specialty.
Students appear to actively match and calibrate perceptions of different specialty characteristics with their current personal needs and expected future needs, and to include cues from self-initiated information collection about a speciality. This agency aligns with Billett's workplace learning theory. Next, specialty patient population features appear to be taken into account; this was not unexpected but not included in the Bland model. Finally, the characteristics of teams and colleagues of a specialty were stressed in the interviews. These three components broaden the applicability of the Bland model--originally created for primary-care careers--to medical specialties in general.
深入了解在医学院学习的最后阶段影响职业偏好和职业选择的因素,超越布兰德及其同事在1995年提出的一个模型(“布兰德模型”)。
进行了一项定性研究。对医学专业最后一年的学生进行了为期一小时的半结构化访谈,内容涉及职业偏好以及影响偏好和选择的因素。访谈内容被转录,并应用了主题分析,以识别数据中的模式和相互关系,并将其与布兰德模型进行比较和对比。
24名学生参与了研究。访谈中出现了布兰德模型中未提及的三组关键因素:(a)学生自主信息收集产生的因素,(b)专业领域的患者群体特征,以及(c)专业内团队和同事的特征。
学生似乎会积极地将对不同专业特征的认知与他们当前的个人需求和预期的未来需求进行匹配和校准,并纳入自主收集的有关某个专业的信息线索。这种能动性与比莱特的职场学习理论相一致。其次,专业患者群体特征似乎会被考虑在内;这并不意外,但未包含在布兰德模型中。最后,访谈中强调了专业团队和同事的特征。这三个组成部分拓宽了最初为初级保健职业创建的布兰德模型对一般医学专业的适用性。