Angradi Ted R, Ringold Paul L, Hall Kim
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804 USA.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA.
Ecol Indic. 2018 Oct;93:1005-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.001.
Lakes provide recreational benefits related to water quality. Using data from the 2007 and 2012 United States National Lake Assessments (=2067 lake visits), we developed indicators for three benefits: swimming, general recreational value, and aesthetic appeal. For two combined ecoregions ("Mountains" and "Plains") we related objective measures of water clarity, including Secchi depth, turbidity, and water-column chlorophyll- concentration to subjective visual assessments of recreational benefit quality. There were significant associations between water clarity measures and visual assessments from which we derived water-clarity based thresholds between benefit quality classes (exceptional, high, low, marginal) for each benefit type. More variation in Secchi depth and turbidity was explained by benefit quality than was variation in chlorophyll-. Threshold values were different between combined ecoregions. Compared to lakes in the Mountains ecoregion, recreational users of Plains lakes have lower expectations for water clarity. Thresholds were generally in accord with water clarity thresholds and guidance derived from published regional studies. Including indicators of the quality of benefits humans receive from lakes in assessments of lake conditions can increase public participation in decision-making and reveal changes in benefit quality over time.
湖泊提供与水质相关的娱乐效益。利用2007年和2012年美国国家湖泊评估的数据(共2067次湖泊考察),我们制定了三项效益指标:游泳、一般娱乐价值和美学吸引力。对于两个合并的生态区(“山区”和“平原”),我们将包括塞氏深度、浊度和水柱叶绿素浓度在内的水体透明度客观测量值与娱乐效益质量的主观视觉评估联系起来。水体透明度测量值与视觉评估之间存在显著关联,我们据此得出了每种效益类型在效益质量等级(卓越、高、低、边缘)之间基于水体透明度的阈值。与叶绿素的变化相比,效益质量对塞氏深度和浊度变化的解释更多。合并后的生态区之间阈值不同。与山区生态区的湖泊相比,平原湖泊的娱乐使用者对水体透明度的期望较低。阈值通常与已发表的区域研究得出的水体透明度阈值和指导意见一致。在湖泊状况评估中纳入人类从湖泊获得的效益质量指标,可以提高公众对决策过程的参与度,并揭示效益质量随时间的变化。