School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Psychological Medicine, Perdana University, Serdang, Malaysia.
School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Body Image. 2019 Mar;28:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
The 34-item Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales (MBSRQ-AS) is a widely-used measure of multidimensional body image. Here, we examined the psychometric properties of a Bahasa Malaysia (Malay) translation of the MBSRQ-AS. A sample of 629 Malaysian Malays (women n = 315) completed the MBSRQ-AS, as well as measures of body appreciation, psychological well-being, perceptions of appearance ideals, and internalisation of appearance ideals. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the MBSRQ-AS items reduced to four dimensions, although one factor had less-than-adequate internal consistency. Omitting this factor resulted in a 23-item 3-factor solution, which we tested for fit using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) alongside the parent 5-factor model. CFA indicated that both models had good fit on some indices, but less-than-ideal fit on other indices, with the 3-factor model showing comparatively better fit. Multi-group CFA indicated that it was not possible to achieve scalar invariance across sex, but internal consistency coefficients were adequate. Evidence of construct validity, as assessed through correlations between MBSRQ-AS scores and additional measures, was mixed. We discuss reasons that complicate interpretation of the dimensionality of MBSRQ-AS scores in this and previous studies, and call for further research on this issue.
《多维身体自我关系问卷-外貌量表》(MBSRQ-AS)共有 34 个项目,是衡量多维身体形象的常用工具。在此,我们检验了 MBSRQ-AS 马来语翻译本的心理测量学特性。我们的研究样本包括 629 名马来西亚马来人(女性 n=315),他们完成了 MBSRQ-AS 及身体欣赏、心理幸福感、对理想外貌的认知和理想外貌内化等方面的量表。探索性因素分析表明,MBSRQ-AS 项目可归为四个维度,但一个维度的内部一致性不够理想。剔除这一因素后,得到了一个 23 个项目、三因素的解决方案,我们使用验证性因素分析(CFA)结合原始五因素模型来检验其拟合度。CFA 表明,两个模型在某些指标上具有良好的拟合度,但在其他指标上的拟合度较差,三因素模型的拟合度相对较好。多组 CFA 表明,无法在性别之间实现标度不变性,但内部一致性系数是足够的。通过 MBSRQ-AS 得分与其他测量之间的相关性评估的结构效度证据是混合的。我们讨论了在本研究和以往研究中,MBSRQ-AS 评分的维度解释复杂化的原因,并呼吁对此问题进行进一步研究。