• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期疾病老年患者及其照护者的生命末期优先事项:定性咨询。

End-of-life priorities of older adults with terminal illness and caregivers: A qualitative consultation.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

SWS Clinical School, The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):405-414. doi: 10.1111/hex.12860. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12860
PMID:30614161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6543262/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As older adults approach the end-of-life (EOL), many are faced with complex decisions including whether to use medical advances to prolong life. Limited information exists on the priorities of older adults at the EOL.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore patient and family experiences and identify factors deemed important to quality EOL care.

METHOD

A descriptive qualitative study involving three focus group discussions (n = 18) and six in-depth interviews with older adults suffering from either a terminal condition and/or caregivers were conducted in NSW, Australia. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Seven major themes were identified as follows: quality as a priority, sense of control, life on hold, need for health system support, being at home, talking about death and competent and caring health professionals. An underpinning priority throughout the seven themes was knowing and adhering to patient's wishes.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights that to better adhere to EOL patient's wishes a reorganization of care needs is required. The readiness of the health system to cater for this expectation is questionable as real choices may not be available in acute hospital settings. With an ageing population, a reorganization of care which influences the way we manage terminal patients is required.

摘要

背景

随着老年人接近生命末期(EOL),许多人面临着复杂的决策,包括是否使用医疗进步来延长生命。关于老年人在生命末期的优先事项的信息有限。

目的

本研究旨在探讨患者和家属的经验,并确定被认为对高质量生命末期护理重要的因素。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州进行了一项描述性定性研究,包括三次焦点小组讨论(n=18)和六次与患有终末期疾病和/或护理人员的老年人的深入访谈。数据进行了主题分析。

结果

确定了以下七个主要主题:质量优先、控制感、生活暂停、对卫生系统支持的需求、在家、谈论死亡以及有能力和关怀的卫生专业人员。七个主题的一个潜在优先事项是了解和遵守患者的意愿。

结论

我们的研究强调,为了更好地遵守生命末期患者的意愿,需要对护理进行重新组织。卫生系统准备满足这一期望是值得怀疑的,因为在急性医院环境中可能无法提供真正的选择。随着人口老龄化,需要重新组织护理,影响我们管理终末期患者的方式。

相似文献

1
End-of-life priorities of older adults with terminal illness and caregivers: A qualitative consultation.终末期疾病老年患者及其照护者的生命末期优先事项:定性咨询。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):405-414. doi: 10.1111/hex.12860. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
End-of-life experiences in dementia with Lewy bodies: Qualitative interviews with former caregivers.路易体痴呆患者临终经历:对前护理者的定性访谈。
PLoS One. 2019 May 30;14(5):e0217039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217039. eCollection 2019.
3
Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.患者、家庭和临床医生对癌症青少年和年轻成人生命末期护理质量领域和候选指标的观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888.
4
Talking about death and dying in a hospital setting - a qualitative study of the wishes for end-of-life conversations from the perspective of patients and spouses.在医院环境中谈论死亡和濒死-从患者和配偶的角度出发对生命末期谈话愿望的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00675-1.
5
Issues in end-of-life care: patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions.临终关怀中的问题:患者、护理人员及临床医生的看法
J Palliat Med. 2003 Feb;6(1):19-31. doi: 10.1089/10966210360510082.
6
The needs of terminally ill cancer patients versus those of caregivers for information regarding prognosis and end-of-life issues.晚期癌症患者与护理人员对于预后及临终问题信息的需求对比。
Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1957-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21010.
7
End-of-Life Communication Between Providers and Family Caregivers of Home Hospice Patients in a Rural US-Mexico Border Community: Caregivers' Retrospective Perspectives.美国与墨西哥边境农村社区居家临终关怀患者的医护人员与家庭照顾者之间的临终沟通:照顾者的回顾性观点
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 May;37(5):329-335. doi: 10.1177/1049909119885099. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
10
Does the Experience of Caring for a Severely Disabled Relative Impact Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Disabled Patients.照顾严重残疾亲属的经历是否会影响预先医疗护理计划?对残疾患者照顾者的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 2;17(5):1594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051594.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthy days at home and prognosis of older adults with cancer and non-cancer serious life-limiting illnesses.癌症及非癌症严重危及生命疾病的老年人在家中的健康天数及预后
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06160-9.
2
"There's a lot of unknowns": a thematic analysis of the experiences of young adults with cancer who died during a psychosocial intervention trial.“存在诸多未知因素”:对在一项社会心理干预试验期间死亡的年轻癌症患者经历的主题分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 9;24(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01725-2.
3
Life, death, and ethics: medical and dental students' attitudes on assisted dying in Austria.

本文引用的文献

1
How should we talk about palliative care, death and dying? A qualitative study exploring perspectives from caregivers of people with advanced cancer.我们应该如何谈论姑息治疗、死亡和临终?一项探索晚期癌症患者照顾者观点的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):861-869. doi: 10.1177/0269216317746584. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
End-of-life care: A qualitative study comparing the views of people with dementia and family carers.终末期照护:一项比较痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者观点的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):631-642. doi: 10.1177/0269216317736033. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
The role of caregivers in interfacility care transitions: a qualitative study.
生命、死亡与伦理:奥地利医科和牙科学生对协助死亡的态度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12608-w.
4
Effectiveness of interventions for informal caregivers of people with end-stage chronic illness: a systematic review.干预措施对终末期慢性疾病患者非正式照护者的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 28;13(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02641-x.
5
Cancer Doesn't Know the Day of the Week: Temporal Trends in Day of Death.癌症不知星期几:死亡日期的时间趋势
Res Sq. 2024 Jul 10:rs.3.rs-4708726. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4708726/v1.
6
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.基于电子病历模块的住院期间严重疾病交流的标准化文档记录的混合方法分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;42(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/10499091241228269. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Trajectories of Health-related quality of life in patients with Advanced Cancer during the Last Year of Life: findings from the COMPASS study.晚期癌症患者生命终末期一年的健康相关生活质量轨迹:来自 COMPASS 研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 14;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01075-3.
8
Important End-of-Life Topics among Latino Patients and Caregivers Coping with Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症的拉丁裔患者及其照护者关注的重要临终议题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 23;19(15):8967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158967.
9
[Prioritization of health resources in contexts of scarcity. SESPAS Report 2022].[稀缺情况下卫生资源的优先排序。西班牙国家卫生系统报告2022]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S51-S55. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.04.003.
10
Palliative Care in Older People with Multimorbidities: A Scoping Review on the Palliative Care Needs of Patients, Carers, and Health Professionals.老年人多病共存的姑息治疗:对患者、照护者和卫生专业人员姑息治疗需求的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063195.
护理人员在机构间护理过渡中的作用:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Aug 21;11:1443-1450. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S136058. eCollection 2017.
4
Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey.患者价值观在医疗中的体现:一项社区和预先医疗照护计划试点调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;9(3):e23. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001177. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Patient reported outcome measures of quality of end-of-life care: A systematic review.患者报告的临终关怀质量结局指标:一项系统综述。
Maturitas. 2017 Feb;96:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
6
Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem.临终时医院中的无益治疗:关于该问题严重程度的系统综述
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Sep;28(4):456-69. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw060. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
7
A retrospective population based cohort study of access to specialist palliative care in the last year of life: who is still missing out a decade on?一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究:关于生命最后一年获得专科姑息治疗的情况——十年过去了,谁仍未得到治疗?
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 May 10;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0119-2.
8
Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review.老年护理院居民作为研究中的合作者或顾问:一项系统综述。
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):337-45. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv201. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Patient-Reported Barriers to High-Quality, End-of-Life Care: A Multiethnic, Multilingual, Mixed-Methods Study.患者报告的高质量临终关怀障碍:一项多民族、多语言的混合方法研究。
J Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;19(4):373-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0403. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Is home always the best and preferred place of death?家总是最佳且首选的死亡之地吗?
BMJ. 2015 Oct 7;351:h4855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4855.