Obaidat Mohammed, Tsaturyan Arman, Tatanis Vasileios, Peteinaris Angelis, Farsari Ergina, Faitatziadis Solon, Pagonis Konstantinos, Vagionis Athanasios, Liatsikos Evangelos, Kallidonis Panagiotis
Department of Urology, University of Patras, Greece.
Department of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia.
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):184-191. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0165. Epub 2025 May 7.
Our experimental study aimed to evaluate the impact of four power settings with different energy and frequency combinations on the irrigation fluid temperature using the thulium fiber laser (TFL). In addition, we aimed to identify the differences between the Ho: YAG laser and TFL by direct comparison of the same power settings.
All measurements were performed with a fluid volume fixed at 10 ml and an outflow rate at 10 ml/min. The laser was fired continuously for 30 seconds with total power settings of 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W with different power settings (energy × frequency) and various pulse combinations using TFL and Ho: YAG laser (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy).
Higher temperatures were recorded when the power was increased from 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, to 60 W. The temperature exceeded the threshold of 43°C when power settings of ≥40 W were applied regardless of frequency (15-120 Hz) and energy (0.5-4 J). Similar temperature increase patterns were reported with different peak power settings. No major differences were found when the same power settings were applied using TFL and Ho: YAG lasers.
Based on our results temperatures >43°C were recorded for power settings ≥40 W after continuous laser firing of 30 seconds using TFL. Modifying the frequency and energy settings, as well as firing with Ho:YAG laser under the same power setting did not affect the patterns of temperature increase. Generally, the TFL shows more regular thermal behavior in comparison with the Ho:YAG laser.
我们的实验研究旨在评估使用铥光纤激光器(TFL)时,四种不同能量和频率组合的功率设置对冲洗液温度的影响。此外,我们旨在通过直接比较相同的功率设置,来确定钬激光(Ho:YAG激光)和铥光纤激光器之间的差异。
所有测量均在固定液体体积为10ml且流出速率为10ml/min的条件下进行。使用铥光纤激光器和钬激光(Quanta System,意大利萨马腊特),以不同的功率设置(能量×频率)和各种脉冲组合,在10W、20W、40W和60W的总功率设置下连续发射激光30秒。
当功率从10W、20W、40W增加到60W时,记录到更高的温度。无论频率(15 - 120Hz)和能量(0.5 - 4J)如何,当应用≥40W的功率设置时,温度超过了43°C的阈值。不同的峰值功率设置也呈现出类似的温度升高模式。当使用铥光纤激光器和钬激光应用相同的功率设置时,未发现重大差异。
根据我们的结果,使用铥光纤激光器连续发射激光30秒后,对于≥40W的功率设置,记录到的温度>43°C。改变频率和能量设置,以及在相同功率设置下使用钬激光发射,均不影响温度升高模式。总体而言,与钬激光相比,铥光纤激光器表现出更规律的热行为。