Visual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and.
Visual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and
J Neurosci. 2019 Feb 27;39(9):1649-1670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1938-18.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
In rodents, the progression of extrastriate areas located laterally to primary visual cortex (V1) has been assigned to a putative object-processing pathway (homologous to the primate ventral stream), based on anatomical considerations. Recently, we found functional support for such attribution (Tafazoli et al., 2017), by showing that this cortical progression is specialized for coding object identity despite view changes, the hallmark property of a ventral-like pathway. Here, we sought to clarify what computations are at the base of such specialization. To this aim, we performed multielectrode recordings from V1 and laterolateral area LL (at the apex of the putative ventral-like hierarchy) of male adult rats, during the presentation of drifting gratings and noise movies. We found that the extent to which neuronal responses were entrained to the phase of the gratings sharply dropped from V1 to LL, along with the quality of the receptive fields inferred through reverse correlation. Concomitantly, the tendency of neurons to respond to different oriented gratings increased, whereas the sharpness of orientation tuning declined. Critically, these trends are consistent with the nonlinear summation of visual inputs that is expected to take place along the ventral stream, according to the predictions of hierarchical models of ventral computations and a meta-analysis of the monkey literature. This suggests an intriguing homology between the mechanisms responsible for building up shape selectivity and transformation tolerance in the visual cortex of primates and rodents, reasserting the potential of the latter as models to investigate ventral stream functions at the circuitry level. Despite the growing popularity of rodents as models of visual functions, it remains unclear whether their visual cortex contains specialized modules for processing shape information. To addresses this question, we compared how neuronal tuning evolves from rat primary visual cortex (V1) to a downstream visual cortical region (area LL) that previous work has implicated in shape processing. In our experiments, LL neurons displayed a stronger tendency to respond to drifting gratings with different orientations while maintaining a sustained response across the whole duration of the drift cycle. These trends match the increased complexity of pattern selectivity and the augmented tolerance to stimulus translation found in monkey visual temporal cortex, thus revealing a homology between shape processing in rodents and primates.
在啮齿动物中,位于初级视皮层(V1)外侧的外纹状区的进展被分配到一个假定的物体处理途径(与灵长类动物腹侧流同源),这是基于解剖学的考虑。最近,我们通过显示这种皮层进展专门用于编码物体身份,尽管视图发生变化,这是腹侧样途径的标志性属性,为这种归因提供了功能支持(Tafazoli 等人,2017)。在这里,我们试图阐明这种专业化的基础是什么计算。为此,我们在雄性成年大鼠 V1 和外侧外侧区 LL(在假定的腹侧样层次的顶点)进行了多电极记录,在呈现漂移光栅和噪声电影期间。我们发现,神经元对光栅相位的同步程度从 V1 到 LL 急剧下降,同时通过反向相关推断出感受野的质量。同时,神经元对不同定向光栅的反应倾向增加,而方向调谐的锐度下降。至关重要的是,这些趋势与根据腹侧计算的分层模型的预测以及对猴子文献的荟萃分析,预期沿腹侧流发生的视觉输入的非线性求和一致。这表明,在灵长类动物和啮齿动物的视觉皮层中,负责建立形状选择性和变换容忍度的机制之间存在着有趣的同源性,再次强调了后者作为研究腹侧流功能的电路水平模型的潜力。尽管啮齿动物作为视觉功能模型的日益普及,但仍不清楚它们的视觉皮层是否包含专门用于处理形状信息的模块。为了解决这个问题,我们比较了神经元调谐如何从大鼠初级视觉皮层(V1)演变为先前工作中涉及形状处理的下游视觉皮层区域(LL 区)。在我们的实验中,LL 神经元显示出更强的倾向,以不同的方向对漂移光栅做出反应,同时在整个漂移周期内保持持续的反应。这些趋势与猴子视觉颞叶皮层中发现的模式选择性增加的复杂性和刺激平移的增强容忍度相匹配,从而揭示了啮齿动物和灵长类动物之间的形状处理之间的同源性。