• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工程伦理中的实用主义与关怀

Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics.

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 2312 Via Seville Road NW, Albuquerque, NM, 87104, USA.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Tech, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI, 49931-1295, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):65-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y
PMID:30617665
Abstract

Engineering is a practice that must function in an environment of incomplete and uncertain knowledge. This environment has become even more difficult in an increasingly complex world. Engineering ethics has to be framed and taught in a way that addresses these realities. This paper proposes a combination of the philosophy of pragmatism and the ethic of care as a possible framework for the practice of engineering ethics that can provide flexibility and openness to address engineering ethics problems more realistically within the ethos and culture of engineering. Embedding values into practice, pragmatism and care provide a broad, reflective, and corrective framework for engineering ethics that can accommodate the realities in which engineering operates. It is shown that these two approaches are more consonant with design methodologies and have a natural fit with design thinking, so they mesh well with what engineers do and with the complexities of their work today. As humans more and more try to alter the socio-techno-natural world, e.g., the earth's climate, the combination of pragmatism and care will allow enhanced ethical behavior. Alterations to complex adaptive systems will produce highly uncertain results that require engineers to have a mindset that allows them to act with humility in the face of significant uncertainty and potential catastrophic failures.

摘要

工程是一种必须在不完全和不确定知识的环境中运行的实践。在日益复杂的世界中,这种环境变得更加困难。工程伦理必须以一种既能解决这些现实问题,又能体现工程伦理实践的灵活性和开放性的方式来构建和教授。本文提出将实用主义哲学和关怀伦理相结合,作为工程伦理实践的一个可能框架,为工程伦理问题提供一个更现实的解决方案,使工程伦理能够适应工程的精神和文化。将价值观融入实践,实用主义和关怀为工程伦理提供了一个广泛、反思和纠正的框架,可以适应工程运作的现实情况。事实证明,这两种方法与设计方法更为一致,与设计思维自然契合,因此与工程师的工作以及他们今天工作的复杂性非常吻合。随着人类越来越多地试图改变社会-技术-自然世界,例如地球的气候,实用主义和关怀的结合将允许增强道德行为。对复杂自适应系统的改变将产生高度不确定的结果,这要求工程师具有一种心态,使他们能够在面对重大不确定性和潜在灾难性故障时保持谦逊。

相似文献

1
Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics.工程伦理中的实用主义与关怀
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):65-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics.临床实用主义:约翰·杜威与临床伦理学。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Fall;13(1):27-51.
3
"An Ethics of Commitment for Engineers".《工程师的承诺伦理》
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Oct;28(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00395-0. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
The evolution of moral thinking.道德思维的演变
SADJ. 2003 Sep;58(8):321-3.
5
Toward an horizon in design ethics.走向设计伦理的视野。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Jun;16(2):355-70. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9157-y. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
6
Engineers' Responsibilities for Global Electronic Waste: Exploring Engineering Student Writing Through a Care Ethics Lens.工程师对全球电子垃圾的责任:通过关怀伦理视角探索工科学生的写作
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):591-622. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9781-2. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Engineering ethics beyond engineers' ethics.超越工程师伦理的工程伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology.基于中西方技术哲学的中美工程伦理教育比较
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1609-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9611-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
9
Hidden in plain view: feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics.显而易见的隐藏:做工程伦理的女权主义者,做女权主义伦理的工程师。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):189-206. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9320-0. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
10
Seeking perfection: a Kantian look at human genetic engineering.追求完美:从康德主义视角审视人类基因工程
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(2):87-102. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4. Epub 2007 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Postphenomenological Study: Using Generative Knowing and Science Fiction for Fostering Speculative Reflection on AI-nudge Experience.后现象学研究:运用生成性认知与科幻小说促进对人工智能助推体验的思辨性反思
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 May 14;31(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00534-3.
2
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.工程伦理教育的多层次审视:迈向工程伦理教育的社会技术取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 24;27(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics.改变工程伦理的范式。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):985-1010. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9491-y. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
2
Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.思考和教授道德问题解决方法:工程学中的微观伦理学和宏观伦理学
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jul;11(3):373-85. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0006-3.
3
American pragmatism as a guide for professional ethical conduct for engineers.美国实用主义作为工程师职业道德行为的指南。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):225-33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0018-4.
4
Future directions in engineering ethics research: microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies.工程伦理研究的未来方向:微观伦理、宏观伦理与专业协会的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(3):403-14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0062-2.
5
Care theory and the ideal of neutrality in public moral discourse.关怀理论与公共道德话语中的中立理想。
J Med Philos. 1998 Apr;23(2):170-89. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.2.170.8920.