Department of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 01851, Lowell, MA, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Oct;28(5):40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00395-0. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
This paper follows a trend in engineering ethics away from universal moral theories towards more contingent/contextual approaches such as pragmatist and care ethics. These methodological considerations are treated in the context of the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions scandal as a case study in the "paradox of loyalty," (i.e. that company loyalty can be both virtuous and vicious). Building upon a combined pragmatist-care ethics approach, the article outlines an "ethics of commitment," inspired by the moral philosophy of Josiah Royce. The ethics of commitment locates the site of moral value in an individual's "commitment to a cause," where a "cause" refers to a purposive community of persons oriented by a shared end or ideal. The ethics of commitment improves upon a pragmatist-care ethics in two notable ways: first, addressing the problem of determining wrongdoing via pragmatist ethics, and second, by emphasizing the costly nature of moral action as a critical part of ethical deliberation, rather than appealing to empathy or moral sentiment. This process-described metaphorically as "centrifugal commitment"-remains contingent and fallible, but in a way that does justice to the broad scope of moral responsibility incumbent upon engineers.
本文追随工程伦理学中的一种趋势,即远离普遍的道德理论,转而采用更具偶然性/情境性的方法,如实用主义和关怀伦理学。这些方法上的考虑将在大众柴油排放丑闻的案例研究中进行探讨,该案例研究涉及“忠诚的悖论”(即公司的忠诚既可能是道德的,也可能是不道德的)。本文基于实用主义-关怀伦理学的综合方法,概述了一种“承诺伦理”,其灵感来自约西亚·罗伊斯的道德哲学。承诺伦理将道德价值的场所定位在个人的“对事业的承诺”中,其中“事业”是指以共同目标或理想为导向的有目的的人群共同体。承诺伦理在两个显著方面改进了实用主义-关怀伦理学:首先,通过实用主义伦理解决了确定不当行为的问题;其次,强调道德行为的代价性质是道德思考的一个关键部分,而不是诉诸同理心或道德情感。这个过程——可以比喻为“离心承诺”——仍然具有偶然性和易错性,但在某种程度上,它符合工程师所承担的广泛道德责任。