Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1358-3. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
To compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in regard to post-fertilization development and outcome with the purpose of ascertaining the most effective fertilization method for assisted reproduction.
A retrospective cohort study of 136 split IVF/ICSI cycles (where sibling oocytes are fertilized by two different methods using the same sperm sample).
IVF-derived embryos developed to the blastocyst stage at a significantly faster rate than ICSI-derived embryos. There was no significant difference in fertilization or livebirth rates between the two fertilization methods.
For patients with sperm progressive motility ≥ 1.0 × 10/ml (who usually constitute the majority of patients), no significant difference between the two fertilization methods was found in regard to fertilization rate or livebirth rate. Remaining factors influencing choice between the two methods appear to be restricted to convenience, financial considerations and concern with regard to possible perpetuation of genetically linked infertility to future generations.
比较体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)在受精后发育和结局方面的差异,以确定辅助生殖中最有效的受精方法。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 136 个 IVF/ICSI 周期(同一精子样本分别采用两种不同方法对同胞卵母细胞进行受精)。
IVF 衍生胚胎的囊胚形成速度明显快于 ICSI 衍生胚胎。两种受精方法的受精率和活产率无显著差异。
对于精子前向运动速度≥1.0×10/ml(通常是大多数患者)的患者,两种受精方法在受精率或活产率方面无显著差异。影响两种方法选择的其他因素似乎仅限于便利性、经济考虑以及对遗传相关不孕可能会遗传给后代的担忧。