Raeder J C, Misvaer G
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988 Nov;32(8):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02796.x.
The per- and post-operative characteristics of three different i.v. anaesthetic induction agents were studied double-blindly in 75 patients admitted for outpatient gynaecological dilatation and curettage. All the patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg i.m. Induction started with alfentanil 0.015 mg/kg i.v. 60 s before either: propofol 2.2 mg/kg i.v., or thiopentone 4.0 mg/kg i.v., or methohexitone 2.0 mg/kg i.v. All the patients received 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The propofol patients were significantly better relaxed and had a higher incidence of hypotension during the procedure. The methohexitone patients had higher pulse rates and a higher frequency of hiccups during the procedure. Propofol induction resulted in a faster awakening of the patients and a better recovery function compared with methohexitone for the first 15 min and compared with thiopentone for the first 240 min after the procedure. Postoperative side-effects were less frequent in the thiopentone group, and minor abdominal pain was significantly more frequent in the propofol group. There was no significant difference between the groups for any variable after 240 min postoperatively.
对75例因门诊妇科刮宫术入院的患者进行双盲研究,比较三种不同静脉麻醉诱导药物的术中和术后特征。所有患者术前均肌肉注射咪达唑仑0.1mg/kg。诱导开始前60秒静脉注射阿芬太尼0.015mg/kg,随后分别静脉注射:丙泊酚2.2mg/kg、硫喷妥钠4.0mg/kg或甲己炔巴比妥2.0mg/kg。所有患者吸入66%氧化亚氮和氧气。丙泊酚组患者在手术过程中明显更松弛,但低血压发生率更高。甲己炔巴比妥组患者在手术过程中脉搏率更高,呃逆频率更高。与甲己炔巴比妥相比,丙泊酚诱导使患者术后前15分钟苏醒更快,恢复功能更好;与硫喷妥钠相比,术后前240分钟苏醒更快,恢复功能更好。硫喷妥钠组术后副作用较少,丙泊酚组轻微腹痛明显更常见。术后240分钟后,各组间任何变量均无显著差异。