Suppr超能文献

一种新型单导联动态心电图监测仪——Cardiostat™ 的验证——与标准心电图动态监测的比较。

Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor - Cardiostat™ - Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring.

作者信息

Nault Isabelle, André Philippe, Plourde Benoit, Leclerc François, Sarrazin Jean-François, Philippon François, O'Hara Gilles, Molin Franck, Steinberg Christian, Roy Karine, Blier Louis, Champagne Jean

机构信息

IUCPQ - Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Canada.

IUCPQ - Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2019 Mar-Apr;53:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiostat™ is a single lead ambulatory ECG monitor. Recording is made through 2 electrodes positioned in a lead 1-like configuration. We first validated its accuracy for atrial fibrillation detection compared to a 12-lead ECG. In the second phase of the study, arrhythmia detection accuracy was compared between Cardiostat™ ambulatory ECG and a standard 24 h Holter ECG monitoring.

METHOD/RESULTS: Phase one of the study included patients undergoing cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter. Cardiostat™ tracings were compared with standard 12-lead ECG. In the second phase, patients undergoing 24 h ambulatory Holter ECG monitoring for control or suspicion of atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Simultaneous Holter monitoring and Cardiostat™ ECG recordings were performed. Tracings were analysed and compared. Two hundred twelve monitoring were compared. AF was diagnosed in 73 patients. Agreement between Cardiostat™ ECG and standard Holter monitoring was 99% for AF detection with kappa = 0.99. Kappa correlation for atrial flutter detection was only moderate at 0.51. AF burden was similar in both recordings. Noise hindered analysis in a greater proportion with Cardiostat™ compared to Holter ambulatory ECG (8.5 vs 3.8%).

CONCLUSION

Cardiostat™ ambulatory ECG device showed excellent correlation with the standard Holter ECG monitoring for AF detection. Holter monitoring was however superior to discriminate premature atrial and ventricular beats and to qualify the morphology of PVCs since it has more vectors for analysis. Added value of Cardiostat™ includes longer monitoring duration, less cumbersome installation and water resistance.

摘要

背景

Cardiostat™是一款单导联动态心电图监测仪。通过两个呈类似I导联配置的电极进行记录。我们首先将其与12导联心电图相比,验证了其检测房颤的准确性。在研究的第二阶段,比较了Cardiostat™动态心电图与标准24小时动态心电图监测的心律失常检测准确性。

方法/结果:研究的第一阶段纳入了因房颤(AF)或房扑接受心脏复律的患者。将Cardiostat™记录与标准12导联心电图进行比较。在第二阶段,纳入了因控制或怀疑房颤(AF)而接受24小时动态心电图监测的患者。同时进行动态心电图监测和Cardiostat™心电图记录。对记录进行分析和比较。共比较了212次监测。73例患者被诊断为房颤。Cardiostat™心电图与标准动态心电图监测在房颤检测方面的一致性为99%,kappa值=0.99。房扑检测的kappa相关性仅为中等,为0.51。两种记录中的房颤负荷相似。与动态心电图相比,Cardiostat™记录中因噪声干扰分析的比例更高(8.5%对3.8%)。

结论

Cardiostat™动态心电图设备在房颤检测方面与标准动态心电图监测显示出极好的相关性。然而,动态心电图监测在鉴别房性和室性早搏以及确定室性早搏形态方面更具优势,因为它有更多的向量用于分析。Cardiostat™的附加价值包括更长的监测持续时间、更简便的安装和防水性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验