• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神疾病患者自我报告的日常生活活动量表的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the self-reported Activities of Daily Living Scale for people with mental illness.

作者信息

Pan Ay-Woan, Wu Chao-Yi, Chung LyInn, Chen Tsyr-Jang

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2018 Dec;31(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1569186118819891. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1177/1569186118819891
PMID:30643499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6322111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported outcome measures have been found to be an effective method of reflecting client perspectives on their personal health condition. The primary aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the self-reported Activities of Daily Living Scale (sf-ADLS) using Rasch analysis in Taiwan.

METHODS

A total of 455 people were included in this study; 224 were persons with mental illness and 231 were healthy adults. We applied Rasch analysis as the means of testing the psychometrics of the scale.

RESULTS

The final version of the sf-ADLS used in this study included 14 items, with no differential item functioning being discernible on the gender variable. The scale was found to be of use in classifying the subjects into four levels of independence.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised sf-ADLS conforms to the Rasch measurement model in the formulation of a unidimensional scale. The scale can be used to measure the level of independence with acceptable reliability (internal consistency as 0.9) and validity.

摘要

背景/目的：患者报告的结局指标已被证明是反映患者对自身健康状况看法的有效方法。本研究的主要目的是在台湾使用拉施分析确定自我报告的日常生活活动量表（sf-ADLS）的信度和效度。

方法

本研究共纳入455人；其中224人为精神疾病患者，231人为健康成年人。我们应用拉施分析来检验该量表的心理测量学特性。

结果

本研究中使用的sf-ADLS最终版本包括14个项目，在性别变量上未发现项目功能差异。该量表可用于将受试者分为四个独立水平。

结论

修订后的sf-ADLS在制定单维量表时符合拉施测量模型。该量表可用于测量独立水平，具有可接受的信度（内部一致性为0.9）和效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8ef/6322111/38508877d88b/10.1177_1569186118819891-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8ef/6322111/a73a44d9bacd/10.1177_1569186118819891-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8ef/6322111/38508877d88b/10.1177_1569186118819891-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8ef/6322111/a73a44d9bacd/10.1177_1569186118819891-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8ef/6322111/38508877d88b/10.1177_1569186118819891-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the self-reported Activities of Daily Living Scale for people with mental illness.精神疾病患者自我报告的日常生活活动量表的信度和效度。
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2018 Dec;31(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1569186118819891. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Measurement properties of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 in Australians with lung cancer: a Rasch analysis.12 项简明健康量表第二版在澳大利亚肺癌患者中的测量性能：一项 Rasch 分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 31;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01794-w.
3
Examining the validity and reliability of the Taita symptom checklist using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析检验泰塔症状清单的有效性和可靠性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Mar;114(3):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表（PAM）是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力？一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.
5
The reliability and validity of the English version of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire for people with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者日常活动评估问卷英文版的信度和效度。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Sep;54(9):1605-15. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev008. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估个人护理参与评估与资源工具（PC-PART）的内部结构效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 5;14:543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0543-z.
7
The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire: Development Into a Unidimensional Scale Using Rasch Analysis.修订后的身体意识评定问卷：使用 Rasch 分析将其发展为一个单维量表。
Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):122-132. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx111.
8
Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).足踝功能测量表（FAAM）得分的信度和效度的 Rasch 分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):229-236. doi: 10.1177/1071100719884554. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population.脊髓独立测量量表，第三版：对英国脊髓损伤人群的适用性。
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):723-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0398.
10
Measure of activity performance of the hand (MAP-Hand) questionnaire: linguistic validation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing in people with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK.手部活动表现测量（MAP-Hand）问卷：在英国类风湿性关节炎患者中的语言验证、文化调适及心理测量测试
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2177-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between physical activity, physical health, and mental health among older Chinese adults: A scoping review.老年人身体活动、身体健康和心理健康之间的关系：范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:914548. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.914548. eCollection 2022.
2
"It cannot be boring!": Developing a measure of function for young adults accessing integrated youth services.“这不可能无聊！”：为使用综合青年服务的年轻人制定一项功能测量方法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Sep 3;6(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00491-6.
3
The study of the validity and reliability of the Occupational Self-Assessment-traditional Chinese version.

本文引用的文献

1
The ADL taxonomy for persons with mental disorders - adaptation and evaluation.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Dec;26(7):524-534. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1469667. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?用于工具开发的拉施分析：为何、何时以及如何进行？
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148.
3
Towards an ADL taxonomy for occupational therapists. Previously published in Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 1:69-76.面向职业治疗师的日常生活活动分类法。曾发表于《斯堪的纳维亚职业治疗杂志》1994年；第1卷：69 - 76页。
职业自我评估中文版的效度与信度研究
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2020 Jun;33(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/1569186120930300. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21 Suppl 1:20-7. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.952885.
4
Examining the validity and reliability of the Taita symptom checklist using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析检验泰塔症状清单的有效性和可靠性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Mar;114(3):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Rasch analysis of the PedsQL: an increased understanding of the properties of a rating scale.Rasch 分析 PedsQL：对评分量表特性的更深入理解。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;65(10):1117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.014.
6
Cross-regional validity of the assessment of motor and process skills for use in middle Europe.中欧洲使用的运动和过程技能评估的跨区域有效性。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):151-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0915.
7
Neuropsychological function and dysfunction in schizophrenia and psychotic affective disorders.精神分裂症和精神性情感障碍中的神经心理功能与功能障碍。
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Sep;35(5):1022-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn044. Epub 2008 May 20.
8
Disability and treatment of specific mental and physical disorders across the world.全球特定精神和身体疾病的残疾情况及治疗
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 May;192(5):368-75. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.039107.
9
Rasch analysis of the barthel index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition.在急性内科疾病入院后对住院老年患者进行评估时，巴氏指数的拉施分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.021.
10
Rasch analysis of the ADL scale of the A-ONE.
Am J Occup Ther. 2008 Jan-Feb;62(1):51-60. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.1.51.