• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applied Informatics Decision Support Tool for Mortality Predictions in Patients With Cancer.用于癌症患者死亡率预测的应用信息学决策支持工具
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00003.
2
Development of Imminent Mortality Predictor for Advanced Cancer (IMPAC), a Tool to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer.进展期癌症患者即刻死亡预测器(IMPAC)的开发,一种预测晚期癌症住院患者短期死亡率的工具。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar;14(3):e168-e175. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.023200. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
Machine-learning prediction of cancer survival: a retrospective study using electronic administrative records and a cancer registry.癌症生存的机器学习预测:一项使用电子行政记录和癌症登记处的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 17;4(3):e004007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004007.
4
Development and Application of a Machine Learning Approach to Assess Short-term Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cancer Starting Chemotherapy.开发和应用机器学习方法评估开始化疗的癌症患者的短期死亡风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180926. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0926.
5
A Real-Time Early Warning System for Monitoring Inpatient Mortality Risk: Prospective Study Using Electronic Medical Record Data.用于监测住院患者死亡风险的实时预警系统:使用电子病历数据的前瞻性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 5;21(7):e13719. doi: 10.2196/13719.
6
Personalized survival predictions via Trees of Predictors: An application to cardiac transplantation.通过预测器树进行个性化生存预测:在心脏移植中的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194985. eCollection 2018.
7
Prediction of myopia development among Chinese school-aged children using refraction data from electronic medical records: A retrospective, multicentre machine learning study.基于电子病历中的屈光数据预测中国学龄儿童近视进展:一项回顾性、多中心机器学习研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002674. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system.从生命体征到脓毒症患者的临床结局:临床决策支持系统的机器学习基础。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):315-25. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001815. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
10
Automated Survival Prediction in Metastatic Cancer Patients Using High-Dimensional Electronic Medical Record Data.利用高维电子病历数据对转移性癌症患者进行自动化生存预测。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jun 1;111(6):568-574. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy178.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Machine Learning for Analyzing Real-World Data in Disease Prediction and Management: Systematic Review.机器学习在疾病预测与管理中分析真实世界数据的应用:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 19;13:e68898. doi: 10.2196/68898.
2
Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review.人工智能在临终姑息治疗中的伦理挑战与机遇:综合综述
Interact J Med Res. 2025 May 14;14:e73517. doi: 10.2196/73517.
3
Performance of electronic medical record tool in predicting 6-month mortality in hospitalized patients with cancer.电子病历工具在预测癌症住院患者6个月死亡率方面的性能。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):829-836. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70012. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Comparing Clinician Estimates versus a Statistical Tool for Predicting Risk of Death within 45 Days of Admission for Cancer Patients.比较临床医生的估计与统计工具,以预测癌症患者入院后 45 天内的死亡风险。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):489-500. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787185. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Longitudinal clinical data improve survival prediction after hematopoietic cell transplantation using machine learning.使用机器学习改善造血细胞移植后纵向临床数据的生存预测。
Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 13;8(3):686-698. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011752.
6
Deep Learning Prediction Model for Patient Survival Outcomes in Palliative Care Using Actigraphy Data and Clinical Information.使用活动记录仪数据和临床信息的姑息治疗患者生存结局深度学习预测模型
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 10;15(8):2232. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082232.
7
On the importance of interpretable machine learning predictions to inform clinical decision making in oncology.论可解释机器学习预测对肿瘤学临床决策的重要性。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 28;13:1129380. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1129380. eCollection 2023.
8
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms Incorporating Electronic Health Record Data, Patient-Reported Outcomes, or Both to Predict Mortality for Outpatients With Cancer.将电子健康记录数据、患者报告的结果或两者结合起来开发机器学习算法,以预测癌症门诊患者的死亡率。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Dec;6:e2200073. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00073.
9
Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data.使用患者报告的症状数据对晚期癌症患者进行 180 天死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):713-727. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
10
Oncologist phenotypes and associations with response to a machine learning-based intervention to increase advance care planning: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.肿瘤学家表型与基于机器学习的干预措施反应的关联,以增加预先护理计划:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0267012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267012. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Imminent Mortality Predictor for Advanced Cancer (IMPAC), a Tool to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer.进展期癌症患者即刻死亡预测器(IMPAC)的开发,一种预测晚期癌症住院患者短期死亡率的工具。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar;14(3):e168-e175. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.023200. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Practice innovation: the need for nimble data platforms to implement precision oncology care.实践创新:需要灵活的数据平台来实施精准肿瘤护理。
Discov Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(108):27-32.
3
Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction.机器学习在癌症预后和预测中的应用。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2014 Nov 15;13:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005. eCollection 2015.
4
Machine-learning prediction of cancer survival: a retrospective study using electronic administrative records and a cancer registry.癌症生存的机器学习预测:一项使用电子行政记录和癌症登记处的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 17;4(3):e004007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004007.
5
Risk classification of cancer survival using ANN with gene expression data from multiple laboratories.使用人工神经网络和来自多个实验室的基因表达数据对癌症生存进行风险分类。
Comput Biol Med. 2014 May;48:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
6
Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients' end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study.姑息化疗与成人癌症患者临终关怀和死亡地点的关联:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 4;348:g1219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1219.
7
Development and validation of a continuous measure of patient condition using the Electronic Medical Record.利用电子病历开发和验证一种连续的患者病情测量方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Oct;46(5):837-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
8
Breast cancer survivability prediction using labeled, unlabeled, and pseudo-labeled patient data.利用标记、未标记和伪标记患者数据进行乳腺癌生存预测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):613-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001570. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology.美国临床肿瘤学会确定了改善医疗服务并降低成本的五个关键机遇:肿瘤学领域的五大机遇。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1715-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8375. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-life care in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.早期姑息治疗对转移性非小细胞肺癌患者化疗使用和临终关怀的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 1;30(4):394-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.7996. Epub 2011 Dec 27.

用于癌症患者死亡率预测的应用信息学决策支持工具

Applied Informatics Decision Support Tool for Mortality Predictions in Patients With Cancer.

作者信息

Bertsimas Dimitris, Dunn Jack, Pawlowski Colin, Silberholz John, Weinstein Alexander, Zhuo Ying Daisy, Chen Eddy, Elfiky Aymen A

机构信息

Dimitris Bertsimas, Jack Dunn, Colin Pawlowski, John Silberholz, Alexander Weinstein, and Ying Daisy Zhuo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge; Eddy Chen, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Harvard Medical School; Aymen A. Elfiky, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-11. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00003.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.18.00003
PMID:30652575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6874054/
Abstract

PURPOSE

With rapidly evolving treatment options in cancer, the complexity in the clinical decision-making process for oncologists represents a growing challenge magnified by oncologists' disposition of intuition-based assessment of treatment risks and overall mortality. Given the unmet need for accurate prognostication with meaningful clinical rationale, we developed a highly interpretable prediction tool to identify patients with high mortality risk before the start of treatment regimens.

METHODS

We obtained electronic health record data between 2004 and 2014 from a large national cancer center and extracted 401 predictors, including demographics, diagnosis, gene mutations, treatment history, comorbidities, resource utilization, vital signs, and laboratory test results. We built an actionable tool using novel developments in modern machine learning to predict 60-, 90- and 180-day mortality from the start of an anticancer regimen. The model was validated in unseen data against benchmark models.

RESULTS

We identified 23,983 patients who initiated 46,646 anticancer treatment lines, with a median survival of 514 days. Our proposed prediction models achieved significantly higher estimation quality in unseen data (area under the curve, 0.83 to 0.86) compared with benchmark models. We identified key predictors of mortality, such as change in weight and albumin levels. The results are presented in an interactive and interpretable tool ( www.oncomortality.com ).

CONCLUSION

Our fully transparent prediction model was able to distinguish with high precision between highest- and lowest-risk patients. Given the rich data available in electronic health records and advances in machine learning methods, this tool can have significant implications for value-based shared decision making at the point of care and personalized goals-of-care management to catalyze practice reforms.

摘要

目的

随着癌症治疗方案的迅速发展,肿瘤学家临床决策过程的复杂性构成了一项日益严峻的挑战,而肿瘤学家基于直觉评估治疗风险和总体死亡率的倾向又进一步加剧了这一挑战。鉴于对具有有意义临床依据的准确预后存在未满足的需求,我们开发了一种高度可解释的预测工具,以在治疗方案开始前识别高死亡风险患者。

方法

我们从一家大型国家癌症中心获取了2004年至2014年的电子健康记录数据,并提取了401个预测指标,包括人口统计学、诊断、基因突变、治疗史、合并症、资源利用、生命体征和实验室检查结果。我们利用现代机器学习的新进展构建了一个可操作的工具,以预测抗癌方案开始后60天、90天和180天的死亡率。该模型在未见过的数据中与基准模型进行了验证。

结果

我们确定了23983名启动了46646条抗癌治疗线路的患者,中位生存期为514天。与基准模型相比,我们提出的预测模型在未见过的数据中实现了显著更高的估计质量(曲线下面积,0.83至0.86)。我们确定了死亡率的关键预测指标,如体重和白蛋白水平的变化。结果在一个交互式且可解释的工具(www.oncomortality.com)中呈现。

结论

我们完全透明的预测模型能够高精度地区分最高风险和最低风险患者。鉴于电子健康记录中可用的丰富数据以及机器学习方法的进步,该工具对于基于价值的共享决策在医疗点的应用以及个性化的护理目标管理以推动实践改革可能具有重大意义。