• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级饮食干预对就诊于三级疼痛服务的患者疼痛结局的影响。

The Effect of a Pilot Dietary Intervention on Pain Outcomes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Pain Service.

机构信息

School Health Science, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Jan 16;11(1):181. doi: 10.3390/nu11010181.

DOI:10.3390/nu11010181
PMID:30654479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357136/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a six-week 2 × 2 design on pain scores, quality of life, and dietary intake in patients attending an Australian tertiary pain clinic. The two intervention components were (1) personalized dietary consultations or waitlist control, and (2) active or placebo dietary supplement (fruit juice). Sixty participants were randomized into one of four groups at baseline (68% female, mean age 49 ± 15 years) with 42 completing the study (70% retention). All groups had statistically significant improvements in three of five pain outcomes. The personalized dietary consultation groups had clinically important improvements in three of five pain outcomes compared to the waitlist control groups. All groups had a statistically significant improvement in six of eight quality-of-life categories post intervention. All groups increased percentage energy from nutrient-dense foods (+5.2 ± 1.4%, < 0.001) with a significant group-by-time effect for percentage energy from total fat ( = 0.024), with the personalized dietary consultations plus placebo fruit juice reporting the largest reduction (-5.7 ± 2.3%). This study indicates that dietitian-delivered dietary intervention can improve pain scores, quality of life, and dietary intake of people experiencing chronic pain. Future research should evaluate efficacy in a full-powered randomized control trial.

摘要

本研究旨在考察为期六周的 2×2 设计对澳大利亚一家三级疼痛诊所就诊患者的疼痛评分、生活质量和饮食摄入的影响。两种干预措施包括(1)个性化饮食咨询或候补对照组,以及(2)活性或安慰剂饮食补充剂(果汁)。60 名参与者在基线时随机分为四组(68%为女性,平均年龄 49±15 岁),其中 42 名完成了研究(70%的保留率)。所有组在五项疼痛结果中的三项均有统计学显著改善。与候补对照组相比,个性化饮食咨询组在五项疼痛结果中的三项有临床重要改善。所有组在八项生活质量类别中的六项均有统计学显著改善。所有组的营养密集型食物的能量百分比均有显著增加(+5.2±1.4%,<0.001),总脂肪的能量百分比存在显著的组间时间效应(=0.024),接受个性化饮食咨询和安慰剂果汁的组报告的降幅最大(-5.7±2.3%)。本研究表明,营养师提供的饮食干预可以改善慢性疼痛患者的疼痛评分、生活质量和饮食摄入。未来的研究应在全效随机对照试验中评估疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1191/6357136/758f06f88ea3/nutrients-11-00181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1191/6357136/97dd4aa333c9/nutrients-11-00181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1191/6357136/758f06f88ea3/nutrients-11-00181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1191/6357136/97dd4aa333c9/nutrients-11-00181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1191/6357136/758f06f88ea3/nutrients-11-00181-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of a Pilot Dietary Intervention on Pain Outcomes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Pain Service.初级饮食干预对就诊于三级疼痛服务的患者疼痛结局的影响。
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 16;11(1):181. doi: 10.3390/nu11010181.
2
3
The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.“总理干预措施”帮助参与者遵循“终止高血压膳食方法”饮食模式以及当前的膳食参考摄入量建议。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Sep;107(9):1541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.019.
4
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
5
Differences in fruit and vegetable intake among categories of dietary supplement users.不同类别膳食补充剂使用者在水果和蔬菜摄入量上的差异。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Nov;105(11):1749-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.009.
6
Longitudinal changes in body weight and body composition among women previously treated for breast cancer consuming a high-vegetable, fruit and fiber, low-fat diet.先前接受过乳腺癌治疗的女性在食用高蔬菜、水果和纤维、低脂饮食期间体重和身体成分的纵向变化。
Eur J Nutr. 2005 Feb;44(1):18-25. doi: 10.1007/s00394-004-0487-x. Epub 2004 Mar 5.
7
Low-fat, plant-based diet in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial.低脂、植物性饮食对多发性硬化症的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
8
The connecting health and technology study: a 6-month randomized controlled trial to improve nutrition behaviours using a mobile food record and text messaging support in young adults.连接健康与技术研究:一项为期6个月的随机对照试验,旨在通过移动食物记录和短信支持改善年轻人的营养行为。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 21;13:52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0376-8.
9
Strawberries Improve Pain and Inflammation in Obese Adults with Radiographic Evidence of Knee Osteoarthritis.草莓可改善影像学检查有膝关节骨关节炎的肥胖成年人的疼痛和炎症。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 28;9(9):949. doi: 10.3390/nu9090949.
10
Influence of a nutritional intervention on dietary intake and quality of life in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.营养干预对癌症患者饮食摄入和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Nutrition. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):1342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.05.004.

引用本文的文献

1
How quality of life is measured in studies of nutritional intervention: a systematic review.营养干预研究中生活质量的测量方法:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jan 24;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02229-y.
2
Characterising concurrent pain experience and dietary patterns in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a feasibility study protocol.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者并发疼痛体验与饮食模式的特征分析:一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 22;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01438-4.
3
Developing a telehealth medical nutrition therapy (MNT) service for adults living in rural Australia at risk of cardiovascular disease: An intervention development study.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions for chronic noncancer pain.营养干预慢性非癌性疼痛的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Apr;32(2):198-225. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12601. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
2
A Review of the Health Benefits of Cherries.樱桃的健康益处综述。
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 17;10(3):368. doi: 10.3390/nu10030368.
3
Anthocyanin-rich plum juice reduces ambulatory blood pressure but not acute cognitive function in younger and older adults: a pilot crossover dose-timing study.富含花色苷的李汁可降低年轻和老年成年人的动态血压,但对急性认知功能无影响:一项先导性交叉剂量定时研究。
为澳大利亚农村地区有心血管疾病风险的成年人开发远程医疗医学营养治疗(MNT)服务:一项干预措施开发研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Oct;36(5):1782-1794. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13193. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
HealthyRHearts - reducing cholesterol in rural adults via telehealth-based medical nutrition therapy: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.HealthyRHearts - 通过基于远程医疗的医学营养治疗降低农村成年人胆固醇:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03306-8.
5
Sustainable-psycho-nutritional intervention programme for a sustainable diet (the 'NutriSOS' study) and its effects on eating behaviour, diet quality, nutritional status, physical activity, metabolic biomarkers, gut microbiota and water and carbon footprints in Mexican population: study protocol of an mHealth randomised controlled trial.可持续心理营养干预计划促进可持续饮食(NutriSOS 研究)及其对墨西哥人群饮食行为、饮食质量、营养状况、身体活动、代谢生物标志物、肠道微生物群以及水和碳足迹的影响:一项移动健康随机对照试验的研究方案。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Nov 28;130(10):1823-1838. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523000843. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Dietary Intake Is Unlikely to Explain Symptom Severity and Syndrome-Specific Microbiome Alterations in a Cohort of Women with Fibromyalgia.饮食摄入不太可能解释纤维肌痛女性队列中症状严重程度和综合征特异性微生物组改变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063254.
7
Association of Prehabilitation With Postoperative Opioid Use in Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study.术前康复对结直肠手术后阿片类药物使用的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2022 May;273:226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.023. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
8
Diet and Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: The State of the Art and Future Directions.饮食与慢性非癌性疼痛:现状与未来方向。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 8;10(21):5203. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215203.
9
Is the Indian Dietary Pattern Associated WithType 2 Diabetes? A Pan-India Randomized Cluster Sample Study.印度饮食模式与2型糖尿病有关吗?一项全印度随机整群抽样研究。
Ann Neurosci. 2020 Jul;27(3-4):175-182. doi: 10.1177/09727531211005226. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Impact on Dietary Intake of Two Levels of Technology-Assisted Personalized Nutrition: A Randomized Trial.两种水平的技术辅助个性化营养对饮食摄入的影响:一项随机试验。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 29;12(11):3334. doi: 10.3390/nu12113334.
Nutr Res. 2017 Nov;47:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
4
Strawberries Improve Pain and Inflammation in Obese Adults with Radiographic Evidence of Knee Osteoarthritis.草莓可改善影像学检查有膝关节骨关节炎的肥胖成年人的疼痛和炎症。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 28;9(9):949. doi: 10.3390/nu9090949.
5
Diet Quality Scores of Australian Adults Who Have Completed the Healthy Eating Quiz.完成健康饮食测试的澳大利亚成年人的饮食质量评分。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 15;9(8):880. doi: 10.3390/nu9080880.
6
Population Characteristics in a Tertiary Pain Service Cohort Experiencing Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: Weight Status, Comorbidities, and Patient Goals.三级疼痛服务队列中慢性非癌性疼痛患者的人口统计学特征:体重状况、合并症及患者目标
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Jun 14;5(2):28. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5020028.
7
Telehealth methods to deliver dietary interventions in adults with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.远程医疗方法在慢性病成人中进行饮食干预:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;104(6):1693-1702. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.136333. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.慢性下腰痛的开放标签安慰剂治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2766-2772. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000700.
9
Establishment of the Australasian Electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration.澳大拉西亚电子持续性疼痛结局协作组织的成立。
Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1007-1018. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw201.
10
Placebo, nocebo, and neuropathic pain.安慰剂、反安慰剂与神经性疼痛。
Pain. 2016 Feb;157 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S98-S105. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000445.