• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚一个大型都市健康区的专职医疗人员的身体活动水平——一项观察性研究。

Physical activity levels of allied health professionals working in a large Australian metropolitan health district - an observational study.

作者信息

Zafiropoulos Bill, Alison Jennifer A, Heard Robert

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia,

Allied Health Professorial Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia,

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jan 3;12:51-62. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S189513. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S189513
PMID:30655673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6322493/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this observational cross-sectional study was to determine if allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health district were meeting the minimal physical activity (PA) recommendations and the proportion that occupational PA contributed to the recommended PA levels. A secondary aim was to determine possible relationships between self-report questionnaire measures of PA and PA measured by accelerometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Allied health professionals, working in the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) in 2016-2017, completed the Active Australia Survey (AAS), Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ), International Physical Activity Questionnaire Long form (IPAQ-L), and wore the ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer for 7 days consecutively.

RESULTS

Based on accelerometry results, allied health professionals (N=126) spent a mean (SD) of 51 (23) minutes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)/day, representing 171% of the total recommended MVPA/day, with work contributing 76% to this recommendation. Participants walked a mean of 10,077 (2,766) steps/day, meeting 100% of the recommended 10,000 steps/day, with work contributing 54% to this recommendation. Sedentary behaviors were predominant throughout the entire day and work day. Compared with the ActiGraph MVPA time measurements, AAS MVPA time showed a fair level of agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.44, <0.01], while OSPAQ and IPAQ-L MVPA time showed no agreement (ICC=0.05, =0.27; ICC=0.13, =0.10, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health district met the daily PA recommendations based on accelerometry measures but tended to overreport their MVPA on self-report questionnaires.

摘要

目的

本观察性横断面研究的目的是确定在一个大型都市健康区工作的专职医疗人员是否达到了最低身体活动(PA)建议水平,以及职业性身体活动对建议的身体活动水平的贡献比例。次要目的是确定自我报告问卷测量的身体活动与通过加速度计测量的身体活动之间的可能关系。

材料与方法

2016 - 2017年在悉尼地方健康区(SLHD)工作的专职医疗人员完成了澳大利亚积极生活调查(AAS)、职业久坐与身体活动问卷(OSPAQ)、国际身体活动问卷长表(IPAQ - L),并连续7天佩戴ActiGraph GT1M加速度计。

结果

根据加速度计结果,专职医疗人员(N = 126)每天进行中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)的平均(标准差)时间为51(23)分钟,占每日建议MVPA总量的171%,其中工作对该建议量的贡献为76%。参与者平均每天步行10,077(2,766)步,达到了每天建议的10,000步的100%,工作对该建议量的贡献为54%。久坐行为在全天和工作日中占主导。与ActiGraph测量的MVPA时间相比,AAS测量的MVPA时间显示出中等程度的一致性[组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.44,P < 0.01],而OSPAQ和IPAQ - L测量的MVPA时间则没有一致性(ICC分别为0.05,P = 0.27;ICC = 0.13,P = 0.10)。

结论

在一个大型都市健康区工作的专职医疗人员根据加速度计测量结果达到了每日身体活动建议水平,但在自我报告问卷中往往高估了他们的MVPA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d0/6322493/babe98648cbd/jmdh-12-051Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d0/6322493/babe98648cbd/jmdh-12-051Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3d0/6322493/babe98648cbd/jmdh-12-051Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical activity levels of allied health professionals working in a large Australian metropolitan health district - an observational study.澳大利亚一个大型都市健康区的专职医疗人员的身体活动水平——一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Jan 3;12:51-62. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S189513. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes of physical activity and accelerometry in people with multiple sclerosis and ambulatory impairment: A cross-sectional study.多发性硬化症伴活动障碍患者身体活动和加速度计患者报告结局的比较:一项横断面研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 May;85:105532. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105532. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
3
Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L).比利时老年成年人身体活动评估:国际体力活动问卷长版(IPAQ-L)改编访谈版的效度和信度
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1785-3.
4
Validity and reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form in Chinese youth.《国际体力活动问卷-短卷》在中国青少年中的有效性和可靠性。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013 Dec;84 Suppl 2:S80-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.850991.
5
Concordance Between Accelerometer-Measured and Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Adults with Autism.加速度计测量与自报体力活动和自闭症成人久坐时间的一致性。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Apr;54(4):1517-1526. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05862-y. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
7
Comparison of IPAQ-SF and Two Other Physical Activity Questionnaires with Accelerometer in Adolescent Boys.IPAQ-SF与其他两份身体活动问卷在青少年男性中与加速度计的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169527. eCollection 2017.
8
The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures.职业坐姿和体力活动问卷 (OSPAQ):一项使用加速度计评估测量的验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):1072. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09180-9.
9
Levels and Patterns of Objectively Assessed Physical Activity and Compliance with Different Public Health Guidelines in University Students.大学生客观评估的身体活动水平和模式以及对不同公共卫生指南的遵循情况
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0141977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141977. eCollection 2015.
10
Descriptive analysis of preschool physical activity and sedentary behaviors - a cross sectional study of 3-year-olds nested in the SKOT cohort.学龄前儿童身体活动和久坐行为的描述性分析——一项嵌套于SKOT队列中的3岁儿童横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 30;17(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4521-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nation-wide cross-sectional study of participation and predictors of enjoyment among Australian adult walking sport participants.澳大利亚成年步行运动参与者参与情况及愉悦感预测因素的全国性横断面研究。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Feb;25(2):e12246. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12246.
2
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in shift and non-shift workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.轮班和非轮班工作者的身体活动与久坐行为:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Oct 12;24:101597. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101597. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Level of physical activity of health professionals in a district hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省一家地区医院卫生专业人员的身体活动水平
S Afr J Physiother. 2015 Aug 31;71(1):234. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v71i1.234. eCollection 2015.
2
Are physical activity levels of health care professionals consistent with activity guidelines? A prospective cohort study in New Zealand.医疗保健专业人员的身体活动水平是否符合活动指南?新西兰的一项前瞻性队列研究。
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Mar 11;7:2048004017749015. doi: 10.1177/2048004017749015. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
3
Attaching metabolic expenditures to standard occupational classification systems: perspectives from time-use research.
新冠疫情期间居家办公人群使用职业坐姿和体力活动问卷(OSPAQ)的有效性:一项二次分析。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Nov;97:103551. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Mediators of a 12-month change in physical activity in ethnically diverse sample of postpartum women.不同种族产后女性身体活动12个月变化的调节因素。
Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2019 Oct;4(19):215-224. doi: 10.1249/TJX.0000000000000106.
将代谢消耗与标准职业分类系统相关联:来自时间使用研究的观点。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4546-7.
4
Epidemiology of Physical Activity and Exercise Training in the United States.美国身体活动与运动训练的流行病学
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun-Jul;60(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
5
Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Surveillance Through Accelerometer Pooling in Four European Countries.通过在四个欧洲国家的加速度计数据集中对久坐时间和身体活动进行监测。
Sports Med. 2017 Jul;47(7):1421-1435. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0658-y.
6
Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers.自我报告工作场所活动是否值得?伏案工作者职业坐姿和身体活动问卷的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3537-4.
7
The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.体力活动不足的经济负担:主要非传染性疾病的全球分析。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Validation of the long international physical activity questionnaire: Influence of age and language region.国际体力活动长问卷的效度验证:年龄及语言区域的影响
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Mar 9;3:250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.003. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review.加速度计与身体活动问卷——一项系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 16;16:515. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0.
10
Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups.不同职业群体的体力工作量与工作能力
PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0154073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154073. eCollection 2016.