Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20892, USA.
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 23;11(2):251. doi: 10.3390/nu11020251.
Military researchers utilize a five-item healthy eating score (HES-5) in the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) questionnaire to quickly assess the overall diet quality of military personnel. This study aimed to modify the HES-5 to improve its validity relative to the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) in active duty military personnel ( = 333). A food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate HEI-2015 scores and to assess sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake in 8-oz (SSB-8) and 12-oz servings. GAT nutrition questions were used to calculate HES-5 scores and capture breakfast and post-exercise recovery fueling snack (RFsnack) frequencies. Two scoring options were considered for the highest RFsnack category: "4" vs. "5" (RFsnack-5). Potential candidates were added alone and in combination to the HES-5 and compared to the HEI-2015 with a Pearson correlation coefficient. Scores with the highest correlations were compared via a -score equation to identify the simplest modification to the HES-5. Correlations between HES-5 and HEI-2015 scores in total participants, males, and females were 0.41, 0.45 and 0.32, respectively. Correlations were most significantly improved in total participants by adding RFsnack-5, SSB-8, RFsnack-5 + SSB-8, and RFsnack-5 + SSB-8 + breakfast, though the addition of SSB-8 + RFsnack-5 performed best ( = 0.53). Future work should consider scoring mechanisms, serving sizes, and question wording.
军事研究人员在全球评估工具(GAT)问卷中使用五项健康饮食评分(HES-5)来快速评估军事人员的整体饮食质量。本研究旨在修改 HES-5,以提高其相对于现役军人的 2015 年健康饮食指数(HEI-2015)的有效性(n=333)。使用食物频率问卷来计算 HEI-2015 得分,并评估 8 盎司(SSB-8)和 12 盎司份量的含糖饮料(SSB)摄入量。GAT 营养问题用于计算 HES-5 得分,并记录早餐和运动后恢复燃料零食(RFsnack)的频率。考虑了两种最高 RFsnack 类别的评分选项:“4”与“5”(RFsnack-5)。单独和组合添加潜在候选物到 HES-5,并与 HEI-2015 进行 Pearson 相关系数比较。使用评分方程比较得分最高的组合,以确定对 HES-5 的最简单修改。在总参与者、男性和女性中,HES-5 和 HEI-2015 得分之间的相关性分别为 0.41、0.45 和 0.32。通过添加 RFsnack-5、SSB-8、RFsnack-5+SSB-8 和 RFsnack-5+SSB-8+早餐,总参与者的相关性得到了最大程度的改善,尽管添加 SSB-8+RFsnack-5 的效果最好(=0.53)。未来的工作应考虑评分机制、服务规模和问题措辞。