Suppr超能文献

结合高负荷和低负荷阻力训练练习:复杂训练研究结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Combining higher-load and lower-load resistance training exercises: A systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from complex training studies.

机构信息

University of Vienna, Centre for Sports Science and University Sports, Austria.

University of Vienna, Centre for Sports Science and University Sports, Austria.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Jul;22(7):838-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present meta-analytical review was to determine the effectiveness of training programmes combining higher-load and lower-load exercises in one workout (i.e. complex training [CT]) on lower-body performance.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL and Scopus) was conducted to identify all publications up to 7 March 2018. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model with the dependent variables countermovement jump (CMJ) height, squat jump (SJ) height, one-repetition maximum (1-RM) squat performance and sprint time for 5m, 10m, 20m, 30m and 40m, respectively.

RESULTS

The analysis comprised 33 studies and a total of 1064 healthy participants. The meta-analysis revealed that CT is effective in improving CMJ (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6%-12.3%), SJ (95% CI 8.0%-17.4%), 1-RM squat (95% CI 16.4%-30.7%) and sprint performance (5m=95% CI -14.8% to -0.9%, 10m=95% CI -6.0% to -2.1%, 20m=95% CI -7.4% to -1.4%, 30m=95% CI -8.0% to -0.6%). However, when directly compared to traditional training methods, only 1-RM squat strength performance and 20m sprint time were superior following CT interventions (95% CI 0.2%-13.7% and 95% CI -1.6% to -0.1%, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: CT is an acceptable method for improving jump, strength and sprint performance in athletes. Compared to traditional training methods, CT seems to produce superior training effects only for 1-RM squat and 20m sprint performance; however, these findings were influenced by single studies and should be therefore interpreted with circumspection.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在确定在一次训练中结合高负荷和低负荷运动的训练方案(即复合训练[CT])对下肢性能的有效性。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

对五个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、SportDiscus、CINAHL 和 Scopus)进行了检索,以确定截至 2018 年 3 月 7 日的所有出版物。使用随机效应模型对依赖变量进行荟萃分析,分别为:反跳式纵跳(CMJ)高度、深蹲跳(SJ)高度、1 次重复最大(1-RM)深蹲表现和 5m、10m、20m、30m 和 40m 的冲刺时间。

结果

分析包括 33 项研究和总共 1064 名健康参与者。荟萃分析表明,CT 可有效提高 CMJ(95%置信区间[CI]5.6%-12.3%)、SJ(95% CI 8.0%-17.4%)、1-RM 深蹲(95% CI 16.4%-30.7%)和冲刺表现(5m=-14.8%至-0.9%,10m=-6.0%至-2.1%,20m=-7.4%至-1.4%,30m=-8.0%至-0.6%)。然而,当直接与传统训练方法进行比较时,仅在 CT 干预后 1-RM 深蹲强度表现和 20m 冲刺时间优于传统训练方法(95% CI 0.2%-13.7%和 95% CI-1.6%至-0.1%)。

结论

CT 是提高运动员跳跃、力量和冲刺表现的一种可接受方法。与传统训练方法相比,CT 似乎仅对 1-RM 深蹲和 20m 冲刺表现产生更好的训练效果;然而,这些发现受到单项研究的影响,因此应谨慎解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验