• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于系统机器学习框架预测涉及碰撞的驾驶员未来驾驶风险。

Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.

机构信息

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.

Intelligent Transportation Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030334.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16030334
PMID:30691063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6388263/
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to predict the future driving risk of crash-involved drivers in Kunshan, China. A systematic machine learning framework is proposed to deal with three critical technical issues: 1. defining driving risk; 2. developing risky driving factors; 3. developing a reliable and explicable machine learning model. High-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) drivers were defined by five different scenarios. A number of features were extracted from seven-year crash/violation records. Drivers' two-year prior crash/violation information was used to predict their driving risk in the subsequent two years. Using a one-year rolling time window, prediction models were developed for four consecutive time periods: 2013⁻2014, 2014⁻2015, 2015⁻2016, and 2016⁻2017. Four tree-based ensemble learning techniques were attempted, including random forest (RF), Adaboost with decision tree, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting decision tree (XGboost). A temporal transferability test and a follow-up study were applied to validate the trained models. The best scenario defining driving risk was multi-dimensional, encompassing crash recurrence, severity, and fault commitment. GBDT appeared to be the best model choice across all time periods, with an acceptable average precision (AP) of 0.68 on the most recent datasets (i.e., 2016⁻2017). Seven of nine top features were related to risky driving behaviors, which presented non-linear relationships with driving risk. Model transferability held within relatively short time intervals (1⁻2 years). Appropriate risk definition, complicated violation/crash features, and advanced machine learning techniques need to be considered for risk prediction task. The proposed machine learning approach is promising, so that safety interventions can be launched more effectively.

摘要

本文旨在预测中国昆山事故涉及驾驶员的未来驾驶风险。提出了一个系统的机器学习框架来处理三个关键技术问题:1. 定义驾驶风险;2. 开发危险驾驶因素;3. 开发可靠和可解释的机器学习模型。通过五种不同的情景定义了高风险(HR)和低风险(LR)驾驶员。从七年的事故/违规记录中提取了大量特征。利用驾驶员两年前的事故/违规信息来预测他们在随后两年的驾驶风险。使用一年的滚动时间窗口,为四个连续时间段(2013-2014、2014-2015、2015-2016 和 2016-2017)开发了预测模型。尝试了四种基于树的集成学习技术,包括随机森林(RF)、带决策树的 Adaboost、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)和极端梯度提升决策树(XGboost)。进行了时间迁移性测试和后续研究,以验证训练模型。定义驾驶风险的最佳情景是多维的,包括事故复发、严重程度和过错责任。GBDT 在所有时间段似乎都是最佳模型选择,在最近的数据集(即 2016-2017 年)上的平均精度(AP)为 0.68。九个顶级特征中有七个与危险驾驶行为有关,这些特征与驾驶风险呈非线性关系。模型的可转移性在较短的时间间隔内保持(1-2 年)。风险预测任务需要考虑适当的风险定义、复杂的违规/事故特征和先进的机器学习技术。所提出的机器学习方法很有前途,可以更有效地开展安全干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/208cf028c014/ijerph-16-00334-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/c925ea970f3d/ijerph-16-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/ea0a07b8efb9/ijerph-16-00334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/a1f261e9b111/ijerph-16-00334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/46880143f60d/ijerph-16-00334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/63cf91699949/ijerph-16-00334-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/fd032cf07d05/ijerph-16-00334-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/9c61905fd575/ijerph-16-00334-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/68c30635b03b/ijerph-16-00334-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/137159a7293c/ijerph-16-00334-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/208cf028c014/ijerph-16-00334-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/c925ea970f3d/ijerph-16-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/ea0a07b8efb9/ijerph-16-00334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/a1f261e9b111/ijerph-16-00334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/46880143f60d/ijerph-16-00334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/63cf91699949/ijerph-16-00334-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/fd032cf07d05/ijerph-16-00334-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/9c61905fd575/ijerph-16-00334-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/68c30635b03b/ijerph-16-00334-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/137159a7293c/ijerph-16-00334-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a3c/6388263/208cf028c014/ijerph-16-00334-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.基于系统机器学习框架预测涉及碰撞的驾驶员未来驾驶风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030334.
2
Applying machine learning approaches to analyze the vulnerable road-users' crashes at statewide traffic analysis zones.运用机器学习方法分析全州交通分析区弱势道路使用者的碰撞事故。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:275-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
4
Improve Aggressive Driver Recognition Using Collision Surrogate Measurement and Imbalanced Class Boosting.利用碰撞替代测量和不平衡类提升提高激进驾驶员识别能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072375.
5
Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.基于实时交通和天气数据的不平衡碰撞预测:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(3):201-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1723794. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in Australia, New Zealand and Colombia: Same but different?澳大利亚、新西兰和哥伦比亚年轻驾驶员的危险行为及碰撞风险预测因素:相同却又不同?
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.SHRP2 追尾碰撞和险象追尾中的转向或制动回避反应:决策树方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 May;154:106055. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106055. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
8
Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.采用机器学习和空间分析技术进行驾驶员风险评估:来自案例研究的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145193.
9
Data-Driven Estimation of a Driving Safety Tolerance Zone Using Imbalanced Machine Learning.基于不平衡机器学习的数据驱动驾驶安全容忍区估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;22(14):5309. doi: 10.3390/s22145309.
10
Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.利用 SHRP2 自然驾驶数据检测变道行为:机器学习技术的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105578. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105578. Epub 2020 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Divergent pathways in urban residents' emergency behavior in China: a social cognition theory perspective based on a survey of 6,817 individuals across 72 communities.中国城市居民应急行为的不同路径:基于对72个社区6817人的调查的社会认知理论视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;13:1621114. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621114. eCollection 2025.
2
A Bibliometric Analysis and Benchmark of Machine Learning and AutoML in Crash Severity Prediction: The Case Study of Three Colombian Cities.基于机器学习和 AutoML 的事故严重程度预测的文献计量分析与基准研究:以哥伦比亚三个城市为例
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;21(24):8401. doi: 10.3390/s21248401.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association rule analysis of factors contributing to extraordinarily severe traffic crashes in China.中国特大交通事故致因因素的关联规则分析。
J Safety Res. 2018 Dec;67:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
Evaluating individual risk proneness with vehicle dynamics and self-report data - toward the efficient detection of At-risk drivers.利用车辆动力学和自我报告数据评估个体风险倾向——实现对高危驾驶员的有效检测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Validation of the influencing factors associated with traffic violations and crashes on freeways of developing countries: A case study of Iran.
Insights into Factors Affecting Traffic Accident Severity of Novice and Experienced Drivers: A Machine Learning Approach.
新手和经验丰富司机的交通事故严重程度影响因素的洞察:一种机器学习方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312725.
4
Identification of Potential Type II Diabetes in a Large-Scale Chinese Population Using a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.利用系统机器学习框架在中国大规模人群中识别潜在的 2 型糖尿病。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Sep 24;2020:6873891. doi: 10.1155/2020/6873891. eCollection 2020.
5
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
验证与发展中国家高速公路交通违规和事故相关的影响因素:以伊朗为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
4
Analysis of hourly crash likelihood using unbalanced panel data mixed logit model and real-time driving environmental big data.利用非平衡面板数据混合逻辑回归模型和实时驾驶环境大数据分析小时级事故可能性
J Safety Res. 2018 Jun;65:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Stress-related psychosocial factors at work, fatigue, and risky driving behavior in bus rapid transport (BRT) drivers.快速公交(BRT)司机工作中与压力相关的社会心理因素、疲劳及危险驾驶行为
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
The role of personality traits and driving experience in self-reported risky driving behaviors and accident risk among Chinese drivers.人格特质与驾驶经验在中国驾驶员自我报告的危险驾驶行为及事故风险中的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Methods to rank traffic rule violations resulting in crashes for allocation of funds.对导致撞车事故的交通规则违规行为进行排名以分配资金的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.023. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Modeling faults among e-bike-related fatal crashes in China.中国电动自行车相关致命事故中的故障建模。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):175-181. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1228922. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
Crash Frequency Modeling Using Real-Time Environmental and Traffic Data and Unbalanced Panel Data Models.使用实时环境和交通数据以及不平衡面板数据模型的碰撞频率建模
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 18;13(6):609. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060609.
10
Prediction of vehicle crashes by drivers' characteristics and past traffic violations in Korea using a zero-inflated negative binomial model.使用零膨胀负二项式模型,根据韩国驾驶员特征和过往交通违规行为预测车辆碰撞事故。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):86-90. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1033689. Epub 2015 Jun 4.