LaKind Associates, LLC, 106 Oakdale Ave, Catonsville, MD, 21228, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Mar;6(1):16-21. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-0227-2.
We offer here a review of intraindividual variability in urinary biomarkers for assessing exposure to nonpersistent chemicals. We provide thoughts on how to better evaluate exposure to nonpersistent chemicals.
We summarized reported values of intraclass correlation coefficients and found that most values fall into categories that indicate only poor to good reproducibility. Even within the "good" classification, a large percentage of study participants is likely to be misclassified as to their exposure. There is sufficient information to support the statement that studies using only one spot measurement of a nonpersistent chemical will be unreliable. It is unequivocal that multiple samples have to be collected over a period of toxicological relevance and with consideration of exposure patterns. Sponsors of research and researchers themselves should be vocal about ensuring that sufficient resources are made available to properly characterize exposures when studying nonpersistent chemicals. Otherwise, we will continue to see an ever-growing body of literature yielding inconsistent and/or uninterpretable results.
我们在此综述了用于评估非持久性化学物质暴露的尿生物标志物的个体内变异性。我们就如何更好地评估非持久性化学物质的暴露提供了一些思路。
我们总结了报道的组内相关系数值,发现大多数值属于仅表现出较差到良好重现性的类别。即使在“良好”分类中,仍有很大比例的研究参与者可能被错误分类为其暴露情况。有足够的信息支持这样的说法,即仅使用非持久性化学物质的一个点测量值进行的研究将是不可靠的。必须收集具有毒理学相关性的一段时间内的多个样本,并考虑暴露模式,这是毋庸置疑的。研究的资助者和研究人员本身应该大声疾呼,确保在研究非持久性化学物质时提供足够的资源来正确描述暴露情况。否则,我们将继续看到越来越多的文献产生不一致和/或不可解释的结果。