a MUSCULAB - Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education , Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) , São Carlos , Brazil.
b School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo (USP) , São Paulo , Brazil.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Sep;19(8):1092-1100. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1572227. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
The aim of the present study was to investigate if resistance training (RT), performed with individualized recovery between sessions (RT-IND), promotes greater gains in strength and muscle mass and reduces the variability on adaptations compared to RT with fixed recovery intervals (RT-FIX). Twenty young men (age 21.9 ± 3.3 years) were randomized in the RT-IND and RT-FIX groups. Five days before the beginning of the training, measurements of the root mean square of successive R-R intervals differences (RMSSD) values of each individual were performed to establish the baseline values. Before each RT session, the RMSSD values determined whether the participants from RT-IND protocol were recovered from the previous session. Participants performed the RT session only if RMSSD values had returned to the baseline, otherwise they had to wait for an additional 24 h. RT-FIX performed an RT session every 48 h. Muscle strength was measured by one-maximal repetition (1-RM) test and muscle cross-section area (CSA) of the vastus laterals by ultrasonography were assessed pre- and post-training. 1-RM values increased significantly from pre to post-training for both groups (RT-IND: 30% and RT-FIX: 42%, main time effect, < 0001), with no significant difference between groups. Muscle CSA increased significantly from pre to post-training (RT-IND: 15.7% and RT-FIX: 15.8%, main time effect, < 0001), with no significant difference between groups. In conclusion, RT-IND did not increase the gains in muscle strength and mass neither reduce the variability in muscle adaptations when compared to the RT-FIX.
本研究旨在探讨个体化恢复间歇(RT-IND)与固定恢复间歇(RT-FIX)的抗阻训练(RT)相比,是否能更有效地提高力量和肌肉质量,并减少适应过程中的变异性。20 名年轻男性(年龄 21.9±3.3 岁)被随机分为 RT-IND 和 RT-FIX 两组。在训练开始前 5 天,对每位个体连续 R-R 间期差异的均方根(RMSSD)值进行测量,以确定基线值。在每次 RT 训练前,根据 RMSSD 值确定 RT-IND 组的参与者是否从前一次训练中恢复过来。只有当 RMSSD 值恢复到基线水平时,参与者才能进行 RT 训练,否则他们必须再等待 24 小时。RT-FIX 每 48 小时进行一次 RT 训练。肌肉力量通过一次最大重复(1-RM)测试进行测量,股外侧肌的横截面积(CSA)通过超声进行评估,在训练前后进行评估。两组的 1-RM 值均较训练前显著增加(RT-IND:30%,RT-FIX:42%,主要时间效应,<0.0001),但两组之间无显著差异。CSA 从训练前到训练后显著增加(RT-IND:15.7%,RT-FIX:15.8%,主要时间效应,<0.0001),但两组之间无显著差异。总之,与 RT-FIX 相比,RT-IND 并没有增加肌肉力量和质量的增长,也没有减少肌肉适应的变异性。