Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Feb;29(2):290-298. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
To evaluate the risk of a second primary cancer after endometrial cancer according to histological subtype.
Using data from the 13 National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries we identified women diagnosed with a primary endometrial cancer between 1992 and 2014. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for second primary cancer risk (all anatomical sites combined and for individual anatomical sites) among patients with endometrial cancer compared with the general population, in the overall study population and according to histological subtype.
Among 96 256 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, 8.4% (n=8083) developed a second primary cancer. The risk of second primary cancer was higher among patients with endometrial cancer than in the general population (SIR=1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.07). We observed significantly higher second primary cancer risk among women with high grade endometrioid (SIR=1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19), serous (SIR=1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.38), carcinosarcoma (SIR=1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.35), mixed epithelial (SIR=1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40), and sarcoma (SIR=1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.45) compared with the general population, but not for women with low grade endometrioid (SIR=1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03) or clear cell (SIR=1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33) endometrial cancer. Women with low grade endometrioid endometrial cancer had significantly lower second primary cancer risks in the gum and other mouth (SIR=0.57, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.97), lung and bronchus (SIR=0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77), and lymphocytic leukemia (SIR=0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93) while women with high risk endometrial cancer histological subtypes experienced significantly higher second primary cancer risk at several anatomical sites.
Risk of developing second primary cancersat all anatomic sites combined and at individual anatomical sites varied according to histological subtype. Clinicians should be aware that women with different histological subtypes carry different second primary cancer risks .
根据组织学亚型评估子宫内膜癌患者的第二原发癌风险。
我们使用美国 13 个国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处的数据,确定了 1992 年至 2014 年间诊断为原发性子宫内膜癌的女性。我们计算了子宫内膜癌患者与普通人群相比(所有解剖部位的综合风险,以及各个解剖部位的风险)的第二原发癌风险的标准化发病比(SIR)和 95%置信区间(CI),在整个研究人群中,并根据组织学亚型进行了分层。
在 96256 名被诊断为子宫内膜癌的女性中,8.4%(n=8083)发生了第二原发癌。与普通人群相比,子宫内膜癌患者的第二原发癌风险更高(SIR=1.05,95%CI 1.03 至 1.07)。我们观察到,高级别子宫内膜样癌(SIR=1.12,95%CI 1.05 至 1.19)、浆液性癌(SIR=1.24,95%CI 1.11 至 1.38)、癌肉瘤(SIR=1.18,95%CI 1.02 至 1.35)、混合上皮癌(SIR=1.22,95%CI 1.06 至 1.40)和肉瘤(SIR=1.28,95%CI 1.12 至 1.45)患者的第二原发癌风险显著高于普通人群,但低级别子宫内膜样癌(SIR=1.01,95%CI 0.98 至 1.03)或透明细胞癌(SIR=1.09,95%CI 0.88 至 1.33)患者的第二原发癌风险无显著差异。低级别子宫内膜样癌患者的第二原发癌风险在口腔的牙龈和其他部位(SIR=0.57,95%CI 0.30 至 0.97)、肺部和支气管(SIR=0.72,95%CI 0.66 至 0.77)和淋巴细胞性白血病(SIR=0.71,95%CI 0.54 至 0.93)中显著降低,而高危子宫内膜癌组织学亚型患者在多个解剖部位的第二原发癌风险显著增加。
所有解剖部位综合和各个解剖部位的第二原发癌风险因组织学亚型而异。临床医生应该意识到,不同组织学亚型的女性具有不同的第二原发癌风险。