Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, The Research Initiative for Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
Department of Occupational Therapy, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13002. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13002. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
To explore whether people with advanced cancer who had assistive devices had higher or lower ADL ability and/or HRQoL than people with advanced cancer who did not have assistive devices.
A cross-sectional study of 164 participants with advanced cancer. Self-reported ADL ability and HRQoL were assessed using the ADL-Interview and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Data regarding assistive devices were collected using a study-specific questionnaire. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The regression coefficients (B) were presented in crude form and adjusted for potential confounding variables (age, gender, cohabiting, receiving help, physical functioning, fatigue and pain). p-Values (p) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Having assistive devices was associated with lower ADL ability (B = -0.923, p = <0.0001), but this association was not significant after adjustment where it was found that physical functioning was a confounder positively associated with ADL ability (B = 0.030, p = <0.0001). No significant association was found between having assistive devices and HRQoL. Both fatigue (B = -0.336, p = <0.0001) and pain (B = -0.124, p = 0.010) were negatively associated with HRQoL.
The participants had the same ADL ability and HRQoL regardless of them having assistive devices. Interventions addressing physical functioning or fatigue and pain might contribute to enhancing ADL ability and HRQoL among people with advanced cancer.
探索是否使用辅助器具的晚期癌症患者的日常生活活动能力和/或生活质量比未使用辅助器具的晚期癌症患者更高或更低。
对 164 名晚期癌症患者进行横断面研究。使用日常生活活动能力访谈和 EORTC QLQ-C30 自评法评估日常生活活动能力和生活质量。使用专门的研究问卷收集有关辅助器具的数据。使用多元线性回归分析数据。呈现未调整(粗)和调整后的潜在混杂变量(年龄、性别、同居、接受帮助、身体功能、疲劳和疼痛)的回归系数(B)。p 值(p)<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
使用辅助器具与日常生活活动能力较低相关(B=-0.923,p<0.0001),但在调整了身体功能与日常生活活动能力呈正相关的混杂变量后,这种相关性无统计学意义(B=0.030,p<0.0001)。使用辅助器具与生活质量之间没有显著关联。疲劳(B=-0.336,p<0.0001)和疼痛(B=-0.124,p=0.010)均与生活质量呈负相关。
无论是否使用辅助器具,参与者的日常生活活动能力和生活质量均相同。干预措施解决身体功能或疲劳和疼痛问题可能有助于提高晚期癌症患者的日常生活活动能力和生活质量。