Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Department of Social Work, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;28(3):e1772. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1772. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
This study used mixed methods to investigate satisfaction with justice and desire for revenge in a sample of employees from New York City agencies affected by the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
A volunteer sample of 196 employees of eight affected agencies provided a short essay about what justice means to them in relation to the 9/11 attacks, followed by 20 quantitative questions covering personal experiences and perceptions of 9/11-related justice. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed for bivariate comparisons of quantitative items and qualitative thematic codes. Mixed methods analysis was used to inspect the associations of the content of all text coded for themes with quantitative categories within and across domains.
Only the revenge domain showed a significant association between the quantitative category and the qualitative theme. The quantitative revenge category was positively associated with the qualitative justice through safety theme. Examination of qualitative content provided insights into the relationships with quantitative constructs.
Qualitative and mixed methods research on justice and revenge in mass casualty settings add new findings to the existing literature and have the potential to contribute to the interpretation and potential expansion of topic areas assessed by quantitative scales.
本研究采用混合方法,调查了纽约市受“9·11”袭击世界贸易中心事件影响的机构中的员工样本对正义的满意度和复仇欲望。
一个由 196 名来自 8 个受影响机构的志愿者组成的样本,提供了一篇短文,内容是他们对“9·11”袭击事件相关正义的理解,之后是 20 个涵盖个人经历和对“9·11”相关正义看法的定量问题。对定量项目进行了 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,对定性主题代码进行了两两比较。采用混合方法分析,检查所有主题编码的文本内容与各领域内和跨领域的定量类别之间的关联。
只有复仇领域的定量类别与定性主题之间存在显著关联。复仇的定量类别与通过安全主题实现的正义定性呈正相关。对定性内容的考察深入了解了与定量结构的关系。
在大规模伤亡事件中对正义和复仇进行的定性和混合方法研究为现有文献增添了新的发现,并有可能有助于对定量量表评估的主题领域的解释和潜在扩展。