• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入母亲如何选择和调整食谱,以及对在线推广健康食谱的启示。

How Low-Income Mothers Select and Adapt Recipes and Implications for Promoting Healthy Recipes Online.

机构信息

Extension Family and Community Health, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

Extension Family and Community Health, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Astoria, OR 97103, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Feb 5;11(2):339. doi: 10.3390/nu11020339.

DOI:10.3390/nu11020339
PMID:30764537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6412388/
Abstract

We describe a 5-year (2011⁻2015) qualitative evaluation to refine the content/delivery of the Food Hero social marketing campaign recipes to low-income mothers. Objectives were to: (1) identify characteristics looked for in recipes; (2) determine recipe sources; (3) understand motivation for seeking new recipes and recipe adaptations; and (4) identify recipe website characteristics users valued. Nine focus groups ( = 55) were conducted in Portland, Oregon. Participants (35⁻52 years) were primary caregivers for ≥ one child, the primary household food shoppers/preparers, enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and able to speak/read English. Participants reported having "go-to" family recipes and regularly searching online for new recipes, especially those using ingredients available/preferred by family members. Recipe websites with highest appeal were polished and engaging to mothers/children, offered user-ratings/comments and were reachable from search engines. Results identified key recommendations: (1) understand the target audience; (2) aim to add healthy/customizable recipes to family "go-to' recipe rotations and understand the impact of generational influences (e.g. how mothers/grandmothers cooked) on family meals; and (3) create websites that meet target audience criteria. Seeking the target audience's input about the content/delivery of recipes is an important formative step for obesity-prevention projects that include healthy recipes.

摘要

我们描述了一项为期 5 年(2011-2015 年)的定性评估,以完善“食品英雄”社会营销活动食谱的内容/呈现方式,使其更适合低收入母亲。目标是:(1)确定人们对食谱的期望特征;(2)确定食谱来源;(3)了解寻求新食谱和进行食谱改编的动机;(4)确定用户看重的食谱网站特征。在俄勒冈州波特兰市进行了 9 次焦点小组( = 55 人)讨论。参与者(35-52 岁)是至少有一名子女的主要照顾者、家庭食品采购者/厨师、参加补充营养援助计划(SNAP)、且能够讲/读英语。参与者报告说他们有“惯用”的家庭食谱,并且经常在网上搜索新的食谱,特别是那些使用家庭成员喜欢/可接受的食材的食谱。最受欢迎的食谱网站是那些对母亲/孩子有吸引力、提供用户评分/评论且可以通过搜索引擎访问的网站。研究结果提出了一些关键建议:(1)了解目标受众;(2)旨在为家庭“惯用”食谱增加健康/可定制的食谱,并了解代际影响(例如,母亲/祖母的烹饪方式)对家庭用餐的影响;(3)创建符合目标受众标准的网站。寻求目标受众对食谱内容/呈现方式的意见,是包括健康食谱的肥胖预防项目的一个重要的形成性步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/7d6ea546cffa/nutrients-11-00339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/6f1470ffaa78/nutrients-11-00339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/184559e14c98/nutrients-11-00339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/7d6ea546cffa/nutrients-11-00339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/6f1470ffaa78/nutrients-11-00339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/184559e14c98/nutrients-11-00339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8850/6412388/7d6ea546cffa/nutrients-11-00339-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How Low-Income Mothers Select and Adapt Recipes and Implications for Promoting Healthy Recipes Online.低收入母亲如何选择和调整食谱,以及对在线推广健康食谱的启示。
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 5;11(2):339. doi: 10.3390/nu11020339.
2
Reaching Low-Income Mothers to Improve Family Fruit and Vegetable Intake: Food Hero Social Marketing Campaign-Research Steps, Development and Testing.接触低收入母亲以改善家庭水果和蔬菜摄入量:食品英雄社会营销活动——研究步骤、开发与测试
Nutrients. 2016 Sep 13;8(9):562. doi: 10.3390/nu8090562.
3
Evaluation of a social marketing approach to healthy, home-cooked family meals for low-income mothers of young children.评价一种针对低收入幼儿母亲的健康家庭烹饪的社会营销方法。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1312-1321. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa037.
4
Acceptability and Willingness to Pay for a Meal Kit Program for African American Families with Low Income: A Pilot Study.接受度和支付意愿的餐包计划的非裔美国家庭的低收入:一项初步研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 21;13(8):2881. doi: 10.3390/nu13082881.
5
Are meal kits health promoting? Nutritional analysis of meals from an Australian meal kit service.餐盒是否有益健康?澳大利亚餐盒服务的膳食营养分析。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 24;36(3):660-668. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa095.
6
Social marketing nutrition education for low-income population.针对低收入人群的社会营销营养教育。
Soc Work Public Health. 2018;33(5):317-328. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2018.1469065. Epub 2018 May 14.
7
Mommio's Recipe Box: Assessment of the Cooking Habits of Mothers of Preschoolers and Their Perceptions of Recipes for a Video Game.莫米奥食谱盒:对学龄前儿童母亲烹饪习惯及其对一款电子游戏食谱看法的评估
JMIR Serious Games. 2017 Oct 17;5(4):e20. doi: 10.2196/games.8142.
8
"Doing our best to keep a routine:" How low-income mothers manage child feeding with unpredictable work and family schedules.“尽力保持规律:”低收入母亲如何应对工作和家庭时间不确定的情况下的儿童喂养。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Low-Income Urban Mothers' Experiences with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.低收入城市母亲对补充营养援助计划的体验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;117(10):1538-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
10
Translating government policy into recipes for success! Nutrition criteria promoting fruits and vegetables.将政府政策转化为成功秘诀!促进水果和蔬菜摄入的营养标准。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009 May-Jun;41(3):218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
User-centered design and development of a web-based tool to support healthy feeding practices by parents of urban minority youth at risk for childhood obesity.以用户为中心设计和开发一个基于网络的工具,以支持有儿童肥胖风险的城市少数族裔青少年的父母养成健康的喂养习惯。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;10:20552076241298433. doi: 10.1177/20552076241298433. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Supporting vulnerable families' meal practices: process evaluation of a nationwide intervention implemented by a retailer and social organizations.支持弱势家庭的膳食实践:零售商和社会组织实施的全国性干预措施的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20488-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between culinary skills and eating behaviors: Challenges and opportunities for parents and families.烹饪技能与饮食行为之间的关系:家长和家庭面临的挑战与机遇。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Jul 1;191:95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Who's cooking? Trends in US home food preparation by gender, education, and race/ethnicity from 2003 to 2016.谁在做饭?2003 年至 2016 年美国按性别、教育程度和种族/族裔划分的家庭食品准备趋势。
Nutr J. 2018 Apr 2;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0347-9.
3
Self-Perceived Cooking Skills in Emerging Adulthood Predict Better Dietary Behaviors and Intake 10 Years Later: A Longitudinal Study.
Cooking behavior among mothers of children aged 2-5 years old in Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.
印度尼西亚东南苏拉威西肯达里 2-5 岁儿童的母亲的烹饪行为。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;24(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17826-1.
4
Feasibility and implementation of a grocery shopping intervention for adults diagnosed with or at-risk for type 2 diabetes.为诊断患有 2 型糖尿病或有患 2 型糖尿病风险的成年人实施杂货购物干预的可行性和实施情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):2118-2129. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001453. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Ultra-Processed Foods as Ingredients of Culinary Recipes Shared on Popular Brazilian YouTube Cooking Channels.超加工食品作为流行的巴西 YouTube 烹饪频道食谱的成分。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 7;14(18):3689. doi: 10.3390/nu14183689.
6
Who We Seek and What We Eat? Sources of Food Choice Inspirations and Their Associations with Adult Dietary Patterns before and during the COVID-19 Lockdown in New Zealand.我们在寻找什么,我们在吃什么?食物选择灵感的来源及其与新西兰 COVID-19 封锁前后成人饮食模式的关联。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):3917. doi: 10.3390/nu13113917.
7
Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.社会经济弱势群体的健康饮食策略:元民族志研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1942416. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1942416.
8
Healthfulness Assessment of Recipes Shared on Pinterest: Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis.食谱在品趣志上的健康度评估:自然语言处理和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e25757. doi: 10.2196/25757.
9
The Multifaceted Dimensions of Food Choice and Nutrition.食物选择与营养的多重视角。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 16;12(2):502. doi: 10.3390/nu12020502.
10
An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews on Food Choice and Nutrition Published between 2017 and-2019.2017 年至 2019 年发表的关于食物选择和营养的系统评价的伞式回顾。
Nutrients. 2019 Oct 7;11(10):2398. doi: 10.3390/nu11102398.
成年初显期自我感知的烹饪技能可预测 10 年后更好的饮食行为和摄入量:一项纵向研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 May;50(5):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study.在家烹饪食物的频率及其对饮食和健康的潜在益处:一项基于人群队列研究的横断面分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 17;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0567-y.
5
Cooking Matters for Adults Improves Food Resource Management Skills and Self-confidence Among Low-Income Participants.“成人烹饪要事”项目提升了低收入参与者的食物资源管理技能和自信心。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jul-Aug;49(7):545-553.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.04.008.
6
Predicting healthy eating intention and adherence to dietary recommendations during pregnancy in Australia using the Theory of Planned Behaviour.采用计划行为理论预测澳大利亚孕妇的健康饮食意愿和对饮食建议的依从性。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 20.
7
Cooking at Home: A Strategy to Comply With U.S. Dietary Guidelines at No Extra Cost.在家烹饪:一种无需额外花费即可遵循美国膳食指南的策略。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):616-624. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Decision-making processes shaping the home food environments of young adult women with and without children.塑造有子女和无子女年轻成年女性家庭食物环境的决策过程。
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:124-133. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Preferences of women for web-based nutritional information in pregnancy.孕期女性对基于网络的营养信息的偏好。
Public Health. 2017 Feb;143:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies.家庭烹饪的健康与社会决定因素及结果:观察性研究的系统评价
Appetite. 2017 Apr 1;111:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 23.