• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多场次性侵预防教育评估:项目参与的独特效果。

A Multisession Evaluation of Sexual Assault Prevention Education: The Unique Effects of Program Participation.

机构信息

Arizona State University, Athens, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7692-NP7716. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829767. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1177/0886260519829767
PMID:30770028
Abstract

One in five college women report being sexually assaulted, while men have the greatest likelihood to commit a sexual assault while attending a university. Because freshmen and sophomore college women are particularly vulnerable to victimization, it is important to provide effective sexual assault prevention education. The current study examines a multisession approach to sexual assault prevention at a southwestern university. This exploratory study assesses scores measuring knowledge of sexual assault, knowledge about healthy sexual relationships, and intent to act to prevent a sexual assault or after one has occurred, after students complete at least one of five sexual assault prevention programs (Community of Care, Consent and Respect, Step Up!, Live Well, or Frisky Business). Results demonstrated that participation in each program had unique effects and the number of programs a student participated in did not significantly affect scores. None of the programs produced significantly higher scores on all three measures. Multiple programs produced significantly higher scores on the knowledge and intervention/resources scales, but none had the same results for the healthy sexual relationships scale. Also, a student's experiences of sexual violence significantly predicted their scores on all three measures. Because each program had different characteristics, the varying results make it difficult to identify the particular factors that led to the best results. Future research must seek to identify the particular combination of factors that produce the best outcomes in terms of changing attitudes and behavior concerning sexual assault and intent to act.

摘要

五分之一的女大学生报告曾遭受性侵犯,而男性在大学期间最有可能犯下性侵犯罪行。由于大一和大二的女大学生特别容易成为受害者,因此提供有效的性侵犯预防教育至关重要。本研究考察了西南某大学采用的多阶段性侵犯预防方法。这项探索性研究评估了在学生完成至少五个性侵犯预防项目(关爱社区、同意与尊重、行动起来、健康生活或花花公子)中的一个或多个项目后,衡量性侵犯知识、健康性关系知识和预防或应对性侵犯意图的得分。结果表明,每个项目的参与都有独特的效果,学生参与的项目数量并不显著影响得分。没有一个项目在所有三个方面都显著提高了分数。多个项目在知识和干预/资源方面的得分显著提高,但在健康性关系方面没有相同的结果。此外,学生的性暴力经历显著预测了他们在所有三个方面的得分。由于每个项目都有不同的特点,不同的结果使得很难确定导致最佳结果的特定因素。未来的研究必须努力确定在改变有关性侵犯的态度和行为以及预防意图方面产生最佳结果的特定因素组合。

相似文献

1
A Multisession Evaluation of Sexual Assault Prevention Education: The Unique Effects of Program Participation.多场次性侵预防教育评估:项目参与的独特效果。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7692-NP7716. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829767. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Effects of Campus Sexual Assault Prevention Programs on Attitudes and Behaviors Among American College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国大学生校园性侵预防计划对态度和行为的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Jun;72(6):831-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
4
Forcible, Substance-facilitated, and Incapacitated Sexual Assault Among University Women: A Canadian Sample.在加拿大,女大学生遭受强迫、物质辅助和意识丧失性侵犯的情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP11198-NP11222. doi: 10.1177/0886260521991297. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
High Prevalence of Sexual Assault Victimization Experiences Among University Fraternity Men.大学兄弟会男性中性侵犯受害经历的高发生率。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):11755-11767. doi: 10.1177/0886260519900282. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
6
Through the Looking Glass: Exploring How College Students' Perceptions of the Police Influence Sexual Assault Victimization Reporting.透过镜子:探究大学生对警察的认知如何影响性侵犯报案情况
J Interpers Violence. 2015 Sep;30(14):2447-69. doi: 10.1177/0886260514553116. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
Student reports of attendance at programs to reduce campus sexual assault and harassment.学生对参与减少校园性侵犯和性骚扰项目的报告。
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Feb-Mar;71(2):543-553. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1898405. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Does sex education before college protect students from sexual assault in college?大学前的性教育是否能保护大学生免受大学期间的性侵犯?
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0205951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205951. eCollection 2018.
9
The Gray Area of Defining Sexual Assault: An Exploratory Study of College Students' Perceptions.界定性侵犯的灰色地带:对大学生认知的探索性研究。
Soc Work. 2020 Jul 1;65(3):257-265. doi: 10.1093/sw/swaa017.
10
International and Domestic College Students: A Comparison of Campus Sexual Assault Victimization.国际学生与国内学生:校园性侵受害情况比较。
Violence Vict. 2023 Feb 1;38(1):77-94. doi: 10.1891/VV-2022-0035. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Justice for Women After Sexual Assault: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.性侵犯后妇女的正义:批判性综合解释。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3457-3472. doi: 10.1177/15248380241248411. Epub 2024 May 9.