• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科与成人外科疾病在线健康信息的差异。

Disparity in online health information in pediatric vs. adult surgical conditions.

作者信息

Dee Edward C, Varady Nathan H, Katz Jeffrey N, Buchmiller Terry L

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Jul;35(7):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04451-y. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-019-04451-y
PMID:30770976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the quality of online health information (OHI) for adult surgical conditions is well described, the availability of quality OHI for pediatric surgical conditions, and the comparison to that of adult surgical OHI, remains undefined.

METHODS

Medical and lay terms for 15 pediatric and 15 adult surgical conditions were searched using Google in English. The Health on the Net Foundation, a non-governmental OHI accreditation body, designates approval for quality websites. We compared the role of patient population while controlling for disease incidence (pediatric vs. adult), term complexity (medical vs. lay), and order (earlier vs. later listing of websites) on availability of quality OHI among the first 100 websites for each term.

RESULTS

Among the first 100 websites, the adjusted mean number of quality websites was 11.80 for pediatric vs. 17.92 for adult medical search terms, and 13.27 for pediatric vs. 18.20 for adult lay search terms (P < 0.05 for all). Term complexity did not affect quality, and earlier appearing results were more likely to be of high quality.

CONCLUSION

Availability of quality pediatric surgical OHI lags behind that of adult surgical OHI, even when controlling for disease incidence. These findings highlight the potential need for increased quality OHI in pediatric surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管针对成人外科疾病的在线健康信息(OHI)质量已有充分描述,但针对小儿外科疾病的高质量OHI的可用性,以及与成人外科OHI的比较,仍不明确。

方法

使用谷歌英文搜索15种小儿和15种成人外科疾病的医学术语和通俗术语。网络健康基金会是一个非政府OHI认证机构,负责指定对优质网站的批准。我们比较了患者群体的作用,同时控制疾病发病率(小儿与成人)、术语复杂性(医学与通俗)以及顺序(网站的较早与较晚列出)对每个术语前100个网站中高质量OHI可用性的影响。

结果

在前100个网站中,小儿医学搜索词的高质量网站调整后平均数量为11.80,而成人医学搜索词为17.92;小儿通俗搜索词为13.27,而成人通俗搜索词为18.20(所有P值均<0.05)。术语复杂性不影响质量,较早出现的结果更有可能是高质量的。

结论

即使在控制疾病发病率的情况下,高质量小儿外科OHI的可用性仍落后于成人外科OHI。这些发现凸显了小儿外科领域对提高高质量OHI的潜在需求。

相似文献

1
Disparity in online health information in pediatric vs. adult surgical conditions.儿科与成人外科疾病在线健康信息的差异。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Jul;35(7):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04451-y. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Radiation Oncology Online: Quality, Strategies, and Disparities.放射肿瘤学在线:质量、策略和差异。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct;35(5):988-996. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01553-y.
3
Adverse Effects of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Common Malignancies: What Is the Quality of Information Patients Are Finding Online?常见恶性肿瘤放化疗的不良反应:患者在网上找到的信息质量如何?
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Feb;36(1):178-188. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01614-2.
4
eHealth Search Patterns: A Comparison of Private and Public Health Care Markets Using Online Panel Data.电子健康搜索模式:使用在线面板数据对私营和公共医疗保健市场的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 13;19(4):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6739.
5
Pediatric surgery on the Internet: is the truth out there?互联网上的小儿外科手术:真相何在?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Aug;35(8):1179-82. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.8723.
6
What Predicts Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior Among Egyptian Adults? A Cross-Sectional Study.什么因素能预测埃及成年人的在线健康信息搜索行为?一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 22;19(6):e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6855.
7
Partial nephrectomy online: a preliminary evaluation of the quality of health information on the Internet.部分肾切除术在线:互联网健康信息质量的初步评估。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E765-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11626.x. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
8
Analysis of readability and quality of web pages addressing both common and uncommon topics in pediatric surgery.针对小儿外科常见和罕见主题的网页可读性及质量分析。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;22(3):228-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1308704. Epub 2012 May 10.
9
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.网站以及谷歌搜索中关于人类健康和食品信息的语言偏好。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 28;9(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e18.
10
Improving the transparency of health information found on the internet through the honcode: a comparative study.通过健康网站内容标准提高互联网上健康信息的透明度:一项比较研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:654-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the web as a source of information for patients with chest wall deformities: insights into engagement and disparities.评估网络作为胸壁畸形患者信息源:参与度和差异的洞察。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jun 4;40(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05732-x.
2
A Readability Analysis of Online Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis Patient Resources Among Pediatric Hospital Web Pages: A US-Based Study.基于美国的研究:对小儿科医院网页中在线脊柱滑脱和峡部裂患者资源的可读性分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Nov 15;7(11). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00177. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
3
Investigation of the Readability and Reliability of Online Health Information for Cancer Patients During the Coronavirus Pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis.骨关节炎互联网信息质量和内容的国际评估。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Aug;26(8):1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Parental Internet Use and Health Information Seeking Behavior Comparing Elective and Emergency Pediatric Surgical Situations.父母的互联网使用情况及健康信息寻求行为:择期与急诊小儿外科手术情况的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;28(1):89-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604021. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
3
Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment.
在冠状病毒大流行期间调查癌症患者在线健康信息的可理解性和可靠性。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):462-466. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02140-4. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Availability and Readability of Online Patient Information on Osteosarcoma: Assessment of Pediatric Hospital and National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center (NCIDCC) Osteosarcoma Web Pages.骨肉瘤在线患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院及国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心(NCIDCC)骨肉瘤网页评估
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Aug 19;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00054. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
互联网上的胸外科手术信息:多语言质量评估
Interact J Med Res. 2017 May 12;6(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6732.
4
Internet Use by Parents of Children With Rare Conditions: Findings From a Study on Parents' Web Information Needs.罕见病患儿家长的互联网使用情况:一项关于家长网络信息需求的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 28;19(2):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5834.
5
Births: Final Data for 2015.出生情况:2015年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Jan;66(1):1.
6
Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review.互联网健康信息搜索与医患关系:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 19;19(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5729.
7
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
8
Third Molars on the Internet: A Guide for Assessing Information Quality and Readability.互联网上的第三磨牙:信息质量与可读性评估指南
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Oct 6;4(4):e19. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4712.
9
Quality of online information to support patient decision-making in breast cancer surgery.支持乳腺癌手术患者决策的在线信息质量
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):575-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.24046. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
10
Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.互联网上女性尿失禁健康信息的质量:多语言评估
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2742-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.