Suppr超能文献

专家对车辆质子交换膜燃料电池的成本及预期未来性能的评估。

Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles.

作者信息

Whiston Michael M, Azevedo Inês L, Litster Shawn, Whitefoot Kate S, Samaras Constantine, Whitacre Jay F

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 12;116(11):4899-4904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804221116. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

Abstract

Despite decades of development, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) still lack wide market acceptance in vehicles. To understand the expected trajectories of PEMFC attributes that influence adoption, we conducted an expert elicitation assessment of the current and expected future cost and performance of automotive PEMFCs. We elicited 39 experts' assessments of PEMFC system cost, stack durability, and stack power density under a hypothetical, large-scale production scenario. Experts assessed the median 2017 automotive cost to be $75/kW, stack durability to be 4,000 hours, and stack power density to be 2.5 kW/L. However, experts ranged widely in their assessments. Experts' 2017 best cost assessments ranged from $40 to $500/kW, durability assessments ranged from 1,200 to 12,000 hours, and power density assessments ranged from 0.5 to 4 kW/L. Most respondents expected the 2020 cost to fall short of the 2020 target of the US Department of Energy (DOE). However, most respondents anticipated that the DOE's ultimate target of $30/kW would be met by 2050 and a power density of 3 kW/L would be achieved by 2035. Fifteen experts thought that the DOE's ultimate durability target of 8,000 hours would be met by 2050. In general, experts identified high Pt group metal loading as the most significant barrier to reducing cost. Recommended research and development (R&D) funding was allocated to "catalysts and electrodes," followed in decreasing amount by "fuel cell performance and durability," "membranes and electrolytes," and "testing and technical assessment." Our results could be used to inform public and private R&D decisions and technology roadmaps.

摘要

尽管经过了数十年的发展,质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)在车辆领域仍未获得广泛的市场认可。为了解影响其应用的PEMFC属性的预期发展轨迹,我们针对汽车用PEMFC当前及预期未来的成本和性能进行了专家意见征集评估。我们征集了39位专家对假设的大规模生产场景下PEMFC系统成本、电池堆耐久性和电池堆功率密度的评估意见。专家们评估2017年汽车用PEMFC的成本中位数为75美元/千瓦,电池堆耐久性为4000小时,电池堆功率密度为2.5千瓦/升。然而,专家们的评估结果差异很大。专家们对2017年最佳成本的评估范围为40至500美元/千瓦,耐久性评估范围为1200至12000小时,功率密度评估范围为0.5至4千瓦/升。大多数受访者预计2020年的成本将达不到美国能源部(DOE)的2020年目标。不过,大多数受访者预计到2050年将实现DOE的最终目标——30美元/千瓦,到2035年将实现3千瓦/升的功率密度。15位专家认为到2050年将实现DOE的最终耐久性目标——8000小时。总体而言,专家们认为高铂族金属负载量是降低成本的最主要障碍。推荐的研发(R&D)资金分配给了“催化剂和电极”,其次按资金量递减依次为“燃料电池性能和耐久性”“膜和电解质”以及“测试和技术评估”。我们的研究结果可用于为公共和私人研发决策及技术路线图提供参考。

相似文献

10
Flexible and Lightweight Fuel Cell with High Specific Power Density.具有高比功率密度的灵活、轻质燃料电池。
ACS Nano. 2017 Jun 27;11(6):5982-5991. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01880. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

4
Bioinspired and Bioderived Aqueous Electrocatalysis.仿生和生物衍生的水系电催化。
Chem Rev. 2023 Mar 8;123(5):2311-2348. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00429. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

4
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.利用(和滥用)专家判断支持公共政策决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7176-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319946111. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.轻水小型模块化反应堆成本的专家评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):9686-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300195110. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验