Whiston Michael M, Azevedo Inês L, Litster Shawn, Whitefoot Kate S, Samaras Constantine, Whitacre Jay F
Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 12;116(11):4899-4904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804221116. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Despite decades of development, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) still lack wide market acceptance in vehicles. To understand the expected trajectories of PEMFC attributes that influence adoption, we conducted an expert elicitation assessment of the current and expected future cost and performance of automotive PEMFCs. We elicited 39 experts' assessments of PEMFC system cost, stack durability, and stack power density under a hypothetical, large-scale production scenario. Experts assessed the median 2017 automotive cost to be $75/kW, stack durability to be 4,000 hours, and stack power density to be 2.5 kW/L. However, experts ranged widely in their assessments. Experts' 2017 best cost assessments ranged from $40 to $500/kW, durability assessments ranged from 1,200 to 12,000 hours, and power density assessments ranged from 0.5 to 4 kW/L. Most respondents expected the 2020 cost to fall short of the 2020 target of the US Department of Energy (DOE). However, most respondents anticipated that the DOE's ultimate target of $30/kW would be met by 2050 and a power density of 3 kW/L would be achieved by 2035. Fifteen experts thought that the DOE's ultimate durability target of 8,000 hours would be met by 2050. In general, experts identified high Pt group metal loading as the most significant barrier to reducing cost. Recommended research and development (R&D) funding was allocated to "catalysts and electrodes," followed in decreasing amount by "fuel cell performance and durability," "membranes and electrolytes," and "testing and technical assessment." Our results could be used to inform public and private R&D decisions and technology roadmaps.
尽管经过了数十年的发展,质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)在车辆领域仍未获得广泛的市场认可。为了解影响其应用的PEMFC属性的预期发展轨迹,我们针对汽车用PEMFC当前及预期未来的成本和性能进行了专家意见征集评估。我们征集了39位专家对假设的大规模生产场景下PEMFC系统成本、电池堆耐久性和电池堆功率密度的评估意见。专家们评估2017年汽车用PEMFC的成本中位数为75美元/千瓦,电池堆耐久性为4000小时,电池堆功率密度为2.5千瓦/升。然而,专家们的评估结果差异很大。专家们对2017年最佳成本的评估范围为40至500美元/千瓦,耐久性评估范围为1200至12000小时,功率密度评估范围为0.5至4千瓦/升。大多数受访者预计2020年的成本将达不到美国能源部(DOE)的2020年目标。不过,大多数受访者预计到2050年将实现DOE的最终目标——30美元/千瓦,到2035年将实现3千瓦/升的功率密度。15位专家认为到2050年将实现DOE的最终耐久性目标——8000小时。总体而言,专家们认为高铂族金属负载量是降低成本的最主要障碍。推荐的研发(R&D)资金分配给了“催化剂和电极”,其次按资金量递减依次为“燃料电池性能和耐久性”“膜和电解质”以及“测试和技术评估”。我们的研究结果可用于为公共和私人研发决策及技术路线图提供参考。