Yeh Hsien-Wei, Wu Tianchen, Chen Minghai, Ai Hui-Wang
Center for Membrane and Cell Physiology, Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, Department of Chemistry, and UVA Cancer Center , University of Virginia , 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue , Charlottesville , Virginia 22908 , United States.
Biochemistry. 2019 Mar 26;58(12):1689-1697. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01303. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has become a standard, non-invasive imaging modality for following gene expression or the fate of proteins and cells in living animals. Currently, bioluminescent reporters used in laboratories are mostly derivatives of two major luciferase families: ATP-dependent insect luciferases and ATP-independent marine luciferases. Inconsistent results of experiments using different bioluminescent reporters, such as Akaluc and Antareas2, have been reported. Herein, we re-examined the inconsistency in several experimental settings and identified the factors, such as ATP dependency, stability in serum, and molecular sizes of luciferases, that contributed to the observed differences. We expect this study will make the research community aware of these factors and facilitate more accurate interpretation of BLI data by considering the nature of each bioluminescent reporter.
体内生物发光成像(BLI)已成为一种标准的非侵入性成像方式,用于追踪活体动物中的基因表达或蛋白质及细胞的命运。目前,实验室中使用的生物发光报告基因大多是两个主要荧光素酶家族的衍生物:依赖ATP的昆虫荧光素酶和不依赖ATP的海洋荧光素酶。已有报道称,使用不同生物发光报告基因(如Akaluc和Antareas2)进行实验时结果不一致。在此,我们在几种实验设置中重新检查了这种不一致性,并确定了导致观察到差异的因素,如ATP依赖性、血清稳定性和荧光素酶的分子大小。我们期望这项研究能让研究界意识到这些因素,并通过考虑每个生物发光报告基因的特性,促进对BLI数据更准确的解读。