• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚洛德瓦尔的露天排便行为:一项混合方法研究。

Open Defecation Practices in Lodwar, Kenya: A Mixed-Methods Research.

作者信息

Busienei Phylis Jepkorir, Ogendi George Morara, Mokua Millicent A

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya.

Dryland Research Training and Ecotourism Centre, Chemeron, Kenya.

出版信息

Environ Health Insights. 2019 Feb 19;13:1178630219828370. doi: 10.1177/1178630219828370. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/1178630219828370
PMID:30814843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6381438/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As of the year 2014, about 2.5 billion people globally lacked access to improved sanitation. The situation is even worse in the sub-Saharan African countries including Kenya. The practice of open defecation (OD) peaks beyond 72% of the population in Turkana County, Kenya, despite various interventions to end it.

METHODS

This article reports on both qualitative and quantitative aspects of a cross-sectional study. A partially mixed sequential dominant (quantitative) status was used to understand various socioeconomic factors associated with OD practice in Lodwar's human settlements, Turkana County. Simple random sampling technique was chosen to select participants for this study with the sample drawn from various administrative units of Lodwar. Standardized questionnaires, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews were used to collect data.

RESULTS

The quantitative findings revealed that culture was the leading factor as to why people practiced OD with a frequency of 44%. The findings further revealed that poverty was the major influencing factor for latrine ownership among the households (frequency 27%). Pearson χ tests revealed that there was a significant association between latrine presence and education level of the household head (χ = 107.317;  < .05), latrine sharing (χ = 403;  < .05), and occupation of the household head (χ = 74.51;  < .05). The quantitative findings showed that culture was by far the most common factor that contributed to the OD practice with a theme intensity of 31.1%. Further analyses identified 5 major cultural aspects that were associated with OD practice. This included sexual immorality, OD as a common habit, nomadic pastoralism, bride's dignity and mixing of feces. Open defecation as a common habit among the respondents was the most cited factor that contributed to its rampant practice (theme intensity 31.3%) followed closely by nomadic pastoralism kind of life among the residents that limit latrine construction (theme intensity 28.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to cultural aspects, high poverty levels influence latrine adoption and consequently OD practices. Future sanitation interventions addressing OD should assess and factor in these cultural aspects in such communities to come up with appropriate eradication measures which have otherwise been difficult to solve through poverty eradication and sanitation campaigns that have been in existence.

摘要

背景

截至2014年,全球约有25亿人无法使用改良卫生设施。在包括肯尼亚在内的撒哈拉以南非洲国家,情况更为糟糕。尽管采取了各种措施来杜绝露天排便(OD),但在肯尼亚图尔卡纳县,露天排便的现象在72%以上的人口中极为普遍。

方法

本文报告了一项横断面研究的定性和定量方面。采用部分混合顺序主导(定量)状态来了解图尔卡纳县洛德瓦尔人类住区与露天排便行为相关的各种社会经济因素。本研究采用简单随机抽样技术从洛德瓦尔的各个行政单位中选取参与者。使用标准化问卷、焦点小组讨论和关键 informant 访谈来收集数据。

结果

定量研究结果显示,文化是人们进行露天排便的主要因素,占比44%。研究结果还显示,贫困是家庭拥有厕所的主要影响因素(占比27%)。Pearson χ检验显示,厕所的存在与户主的教育水平(χ=107.317;<0.05)、共用厕所(χ=403;<0.05)以及户主的职业(χ=74.51;<0.05)之间存在显著关联。定量研究结果表明,文化是导致露天排便行为的最常见因素,主题强度为31.1%。进一步分析确定了与露天排便行为相关的5个主要文化方面。这包括性道德、露天排便作为一种常见习惯、游牧畜牧业、新娘的尊严以及粪便混合。露天排便作为受访者中的一种常见习惯是导致其普遍存在的最常被提及的因素(主题强度31.3%),紧随其后的是居民中的游牧畜牧业生活方式限制了厕所建设(主题强度28.1%)。

结论

除文化方面外,高贫困水平影响厕所的采用,进而影响露天排便行为。未来针对露天排便的卫生干预措施应评估并考虑这些社区的文化方面,以制定适当的根除措施,否则通过消除贫困和现有的卫生运动很难解决这些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c5/6381438/c8d914b9c894/10.1177_1178630219828370-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c5/6381438/c0f830892aa6/10.1177_1178630219828370-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c5/6381438/c8d914b9c894/10.1177_1178630219828370-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c5/6381438/c0f830892aa6/10.1177_1178630219828370-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c5/6381438/c8d914b9c894/10.1177_1178630219828370-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Open Defecation Practices in Lodwar, Kenya: A Mixed-Methods Research.肯尼亚洛德瓦尔的露天排便行为:一项混合方法研究。
Environ Health Insights. 2019 Feb 19;13:1178630219828370. doi: 10.1177/1178630219828370. eCollection 2019.
2
Latrine Structure, Design, and Conditions, and the Practice of Open Defecation in Lodwar Town, Turkana County, Kenya: A Quantitative Methods Research.肯尼亚图尔卡纳县洛德瓦尔镇的厕所结构、设计与条件以及露天排便行为:一项定量方法研究
Environ Health Insights. 2019 Dec 26;13:1178630219887960. doi: 10.1177/1178630219887960. eCollection 2019.
3
Open defecation among Kenyan households: an analysis of demographic and health survey 2022 and census report of 2019.肯尼亚家庭的露天排便情况:2022 年人口与健康调查和 2019 年普查报告的分析。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Sep 19;43(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00644-x.
4
Progress in sanitation among poor households in Kenya: evidence from demographic and health surveys.肯尼亚贫困家庭卫生状况的改善:来自人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6459-0.
5
Effects of Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) Boosting and Household Factors on Latrine Ownership in Siaya County, Kenya.肯尼亚锡亚县社区主导的整体环境卫生(CLTS)促进措施和家庭因素对厕所拥有率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 18;20(18):6781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186781.
6
What motivates open defecation? A qualitative study from a rural setting in Nepal.什么促使人们露天排便?尼泊尔农村地区的一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):e0219246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219246. eCollection 2019.
7
Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: The case of Machakel district in Ethiopia.由于社会人口和环境因素,拥有厕所设施并不一定能保证消除露天排便:以埃塞俄比亚马卡莱区为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257813. eCollection 2021.
8
Influence of social factors on adoption of sanitation practices in rural areas: a mixed methods study in Nzaui, Kenya.社会因素对农村地区卫生习惯采用的影响:肯尼亚恩佐伊的混合方法研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 12;46:16. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.16.35770. eCollection 2023.
9
Ending open defecation in rural Tanzania: which factors facilitate latrine adoption?在坦桑尼亚农村地区终结露天排便:哪些因素有助于促进厕所的采用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):9854-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909854.
10
Effectiveness of community and school-based sanitation interventions in improving latrine coverage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled interventions.社区和学校为基础的卫生干预措施在提高厕所覆盖率方面的效果:一项随机对照干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Feb 24;26(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00934-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful open defecation-free intervention in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative synthesis systematic review protocol.低收入和中等收入国家成功的无露天排便干预措施:一项定性综合系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):e091478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091478.
2
Spatial variation and geographical weighted regression analysis to explore open defecation practice and its determinants among households in Ethiopia.空间变异与地理加权回归分析探索埃塞俄比亚家庭中露天排便行为及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307362. eCollection 2024.
3
Prevalence of Open Defecation Practice and Associated Factors Among Households in Geshiyaro Project Implementation Sites in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the determinants of open defecation in Nigeria using demographic and health survey data.利用人口与健康调查数据探究尼日利亚随地大小便的决定因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:1455-1465. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.104. Epub 2018 May 22.
2
Enabling Factors for Sustaining Open Defecation-Free Communities in Rural Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study.印度尼西亚农村维持无露天排便社区的促成因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 14;14(12):1572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121572.
3
Open Defaecation and Its Effects on the Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water Sources in Isiolo County, Kenya.
埃塞俄比亚格希亚罗项目实施地点家庭中露天排便行为的流行情况及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Environ Health Insights. 2024 May 15;18:11786302241252732. doi: 10.1177/11786302241252732. eCollection 2024.
4
Determinants of Open Defecation Among Rural Women in Ghana: Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys.加纳农村妇女露天排便的决定因素:人口与健康调查分析
Environ Health Insights. 2024 Jan 23;18:11786302241226774. doi: 10.1177/11786302241226774. eCollection 2024.
5
Hygienic Child Feces Disposal Practice and Its Associated Factors among Mothers/Caregivers of Under Five Children in West Armachiho District, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部韦斯塔马奇霍区五岁以下儿童母亲/照料者的卫生儿童粪便处理做法及其相关因素
Environ Health Insights. 2022 Jul 27;16:11786302221114738. doi: 10.1177/11786302221114738. eCollection 2022.
6
Characterization and drug susceptibility pattern of and in children below five years: a cross-sectional study conducted in Lodwar, Turkana County, in Northern Kenya.五岁以下儿童 和 的特征及药敏模式:肯尼亚北部图尔卡纳县洛多瓦尔的一项横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 May 9;42:13. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.13.32025. eCollection 2022.
7
Contextual and psychological factors influencing open defecation free status: an exploratory qualitative study in rural South Western Uganda.影响无露天排便状态的情境和心理因素:乌干达西南部农村地区的探索性定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12759-z.
8
Open defecation-free slippage and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review.埃塞俄比亚无厕排便滑动及其相关因素:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 3;9(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01511-6.
9
Narrative review of non-pharmaceutical behavioural measures for the prevention of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) based on the Health-EDRM framework.基于健康-EDRM 框架的 COVID-19(SARS-CoV-2)非药物行为措施预防的叙述性综述。
Br Med Bull. 2020 Dec 15;136(1):46-87. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa030.
10
Latrine Structure, Design, and Conditions, and the Practice of Open Defecation in Lodwar Town, Turkana County, Kenya: A Quantitative Methods Research.肯尼亚图尔卡纳县洛德瓦尔镇的厕所结构、设计与条件以及露天排便行为:一项定量方法研究
Environ Health Insights. 2019 Dec 26;13:1178630219887960. doi: 10.1177/1178630219887960. eCollection 2019.
肯尼亚伊西奥洛县的露天排便及其对饮用水源细菌学质量的影响。
Environ Health Insights. 2017 Oct 9;11:1178630217735539. doi: 10.1177/1178630217735539. eCollection 2017.
4
Toilet Talk: Eliminating Open Defecation and Improved Sanitation in Nepal.厕所话题:尼泊尔消除露天排便和改善卫生状况。
Med Anthropol. 2018 May-Jun;37(4):294-310. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2017.1371150. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Switching to sanitation: Understanding latrine adoption in a representative panel of rural Indian households.转向卫生设施:了解印度农村代表性家庭小组对厕所的采用情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Assessing patterns and determinants of latrine use in rural settings: A longitudinal study in Odisha, India.评估农村地区厕所使用模式及决定因素:印度奥里萨邦的一项纵向研究
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Jul;220(5):906-915. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Open Defecation in Newly Created Kenyan Counties: A Situational Analysis.肯尼亚新设立县的露天排便情况分析
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(1):71-78. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0009.
8
Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study.制约奥里萨邦农村沿海地区采用厕所的社会文化和行为因素:一项探索性定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2206-3.
9
Latrine utilization and associated factors among people living in rural areas of Denbia district, Northwest Ethiopia, 2013, a cross-sectional study.2013年埃塞俄比亚西北部登比亚区农村居民的厕所使用情况及相关因素,一项横断面研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Aug 26;18:334. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.334.4206. eCollection 2014.
10
Ending open defecation in rural Tanzania: which factors facilitate latrine adoption?在坦桑尼亚农村地区终结露天排便:哪些因素有助于促进厕所的采用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):9854-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909854.