Shunyi Maternal and Children's Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 110113, China; School of Public Health and Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
School of Public Health and Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:812-820. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.324. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDEs) are three legacy brominated flame retardants (BFRs); however, they are still produced and used in China. In this study, these three BFRs were measured in commonly consumed animal-based and plant-based foodstuffs from Beijing, China, and the dietary intakes of these BFRs by adults in Beijing were estimated to assess the related health concerns. The median levels of TBBPA in animal-based foodstuffs ranged from <LOD to 8.03 ng/g lipid weight (lw), whereas those in all the plant-based food groups were lower than the LOD. The median levels of total HBCD in animal-based foodstuffs were from 1.14 to 5.65 ng/g lw, and α-HBCD was the predominant isomer. The median HBCD level in vegetables was 0.266 ng/g wet weight (ww), whereas γ-HBCD was the most abundant isomer. The median levels of total PBDEs in animal-based foodstuffs were from 3.22 to 13.7 ng/g lw, and BDE-209 was the most abundant congener, comprising a proportion of at least 85% of total PBDEs. The daily dietary intakes of TBBPA, HBCD and PBDEs for adults in Beijing were 2.52, 2.74 and 9.77 ng/kg body weight/day, respectively. Meat consumption was found to be the primary source of BFR dietary intake. A comparison between the calculated estimated daily intakes (EDIs) and the corresponding threshold reference values (TRVs) indicated that daily intake of BFRs via food consumption is unable to cause significant health risks. Likewise, the margin of exposures (MOEs) calculated following the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach were far higher than the threshold, which also proved that the EDIs of BFRs are unlikely to raise significant health concerns.
六溴环十二烷(HBCD)、四溴双酚 A(TBBPA)和多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)是三种传统的溴系阻燃剂(BFRs);然而,它们仍在中国生产和使用。本研究在北京地区常见的动物源和植物源食品中测定了这三种 BFRs 的含量,估算了北京成年人通过饮食摄入这些 BFRs 的情况,以评估相关的健康问题。动物源食品中 TBBPA 的中位数水平在<LOD 至 8.03ng/g 脂质重量(lw)之间,而所有植物源食品组的 TBBPA 中位数水平均低于 LOD。动物源食品中总 HBCD 的中位数水平为 1.14 至 5.65ng/g lw,其中α-HBCD 为主要异构体。蔬菜中 HBCD 的中位数水平为 0.266ng/g 湿重(ww),γ-HBCD 为最丰富的异构体。动物源食品中总 PBDEs 的中位数水平为 3.22 至 13.7ng/g lw,其中 BDE-209 为最丰富的同系物,占总 PBDEs 的比例至少为 85%。北京成年人通过饮食摄入 TBBPA、HBCD 和 PBDEs 的日摄入量分别为 2.52、2.74 和 9.77ng/kg 体重/天。肉的消费被认为是 BFR 饮食摄入的主要来源。计算得出的估计每日摄入量(EDIs)与相应的阈值参考值(TRVs)进行比较表明,通过食物摄入 BFR 不会对健康造成显著风险。同样,按照欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)方法计算的暴露边际(MOEs)远高于阈值,这也证明 BFRs 的 EDIs 不太可能引起显著的健康问题。