Suppr超能文献

更新后的替代瘘管风险评分 (ua-FRS) 纳入了微创胰十二指肠切除术:泛欧验证。

Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):334-340. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003234.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to validate and optimize the alternative Fistula Risk Score (a-FRS) for patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in a large pan-European cohort.

BACKGROUND

MIPD may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The a-FRS could allow for risk-adjusted comparisons in research and improve preventive strategies for high-risk patients. The a-FRS, however, has not yet been validated specifically for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD.

METHODS

A validation study was performed in a pan-European cohort of 952 consecutive patients undergoing MIPD (543 laparoscopic, 258 robot-assisted, 151 hybrid) in 26 centers from 7 countries between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was POPF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC; discrimination) and calibration plots. Validation included univariable screening for clinical variables that could improve performance.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 of 952 patients (21%) developed POPF after MIPD. Before adjustment, the original a-FRS performed moderately (AUC 0.68) and calibration was inadequate with systematic underestimation of the POPF risk. Single-row pancreatojejunostomy (odds ratio 4.6, 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.8-7.6) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, 95 CI 1.4-2.7) were identified as important risk factors for POPF in MIPD. The updated a-FRS, consisting of body mass index, pancreatic texture, duct size, and male sex, showed good discrimination (AUC 0.75, 95 CI 0.71-0.79) and adequate calibration. Performance was adequate for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated a-FRS (www.pancreascalculator.com) now includes male sex as a risk factor and is validated for both MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy. The increased risk of POPF in laparoscopic MIPD was associated with single-row pancreatojejunostomy, which should therefore be discouraged.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对接受微创胰十二指肠切除术(MIPD)的欧洲大样本患者进行验证和优化替代瘘管风险评分(a-FRS)。

背景

MIPD 可能与术后胰瘘(POPF)风险增加相关。a-FRS 可用于研究中的风险调整比较,并为高危患者改善预防策略。然而,a-FRS 尚未针对腹腔镜、机器人辅助和混合 MIPD 进行专门验证。

方法

本验证性研究纳入了 2007 年至 2017 年间,来自 7 个国家的 26 家中心的 952 例连续接受 MIPD(543 例腹腔镜、258 例机器人辅助、151 例混合)患者。主要结局为 POPF(国际胰腺外科研究组分级 B/C)。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC;区分度)和校准图评估模型性能。验证包括对可能改善性能的临床变量进行单变量筛选。

结果

总体而言,952 例患者中有 202 例(21%)在接受 MIPD 后发生了 POPF。在未调整前,原始的 a-FRS 表现中等(AUC 0.68),校准效果不佳,对 POPF 风险存在系统低估。单排胰肠吻合术(比值比 4.6,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.8-7.6)和男性(比值比 1.9,95%CI 1.4-2.7)被确定为 MIPD 中 POPF 的重要危险因素。由体质量指数、胰腺质地、胰管大小和性别组成的更新后的 a-FRS 显示出良好的区分度(AUC 0.75,95%CI 0.71-0.79)和适当的校准度。其在腹腔镜、机器人辅助和混合 MIPD 以及开腹胰十二指肠切除术方面的表现都足够。

结论

更新后的 a-FRS(www.pancreascalculator.com)现在将男性纳入危险因素,并对 MIPD 和开腹胰十二指肠切除术进行了验证。腹腔镜 MIPD 中 POPF 风险增加与单排胰肠吻合术相关,因此应避免使用这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验