• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验(III 期)比较腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术与全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌患者生活质量的差异(研究方案)。

A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) comparing the quality of life between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric Cancer (study protocol).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5396-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-019-5396-8
PMID:30845995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6407283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

KLASS (the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study) is a time-honored study group that has established laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal disease in Korea and has performed some important studies for the rationale of laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. A multi-center RCT (randomized controlled trial) to compare the quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer, named as KLASS 07, has been currently prepared in Korea.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as gastric cancer, with clinical stage IA (T1N0M0) or IB (T1N1M0 / T2N0M0) according to the 7th edition of the Americal Joint Committee on Cancer System, were randomized to receive either TLDG or LADG. For surgical quality control, the surgeons participating in this trial had to have performed at least 50 gastrectomies and at least 30 gastrectomies annually (regardless of open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer). The patients who are allocated to TLDG group undergo intracorporeal anastomosis and those who are assigned to LADG undergo extracorporeal anastomosis for gastrointestinal reconstruction.

DISCUSSION

Thirty-one surgeons from 26 institutions were engaged in this trial. The primary endpoint is 30-day morbidity, and secondary endpoint is QOL assessed by the questionnaire score. The KLASS 07 trial is the first multi-center RCT to investigate whether there are significant and quantifiable differences between the QOL of TLDG and LADG. The findings from this trial are expected to be the critical clues for designing the detailed procedures during laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol of KLASS 07 (CKLASS 01) was registered in http://register.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03393182 (Date of registration: January 2nd, 2018.).

摘要

背景

KLASS(韩国腹腔镜胃肠外科研究)是一个历史悠久的研究小组,它在韩国确立了胃肠疾病的腹腔镜手术,并进行了一些重要的研究,为腹腔镜胃肠手术的合理性提供了依据。目前,韩国正在准备一项多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较完全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)和腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)治疗胃癌患者的生活质量(QOL),该试验名为 KLASS 07。

方法

根据第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统,诊断为胃癌且临床分期为 IA(T1N0M0)或 IB(T1N1M0/T2N0M0)的患者被随机分配接受 TLDG 或 LADG。为了进行手术质量控制,参与该试验的外科医生必须至少进行 50 例胃切除术,且每年至少进行 30 例胃切除术(无论是否为开腹或腹腔镜下胃癌手术)。分配到 TLDG 组的患者进行体内吻合,分配到 LADG 组的患者进行体外吻合进行胃肠重建。

讨论

来自 26 家机构的 31 名外科医生参与了这项试验。主要终点是 30 天发病率,次要终点是通过问卷评分评估的 QOL。KLASS 07 试验是第一项旨在研究 TLDG 和 LADG 之间的 QOL 是否存在显著和可量化差异的多中心 RCT。该试验的结果有望为腹腔镜胃癌手术的详细操作提供重要线索。

试验注册

KLASS 07(CKLASS 01)的方案已在 http://register.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT03393182(注册日期:2018 年 1 月 2 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f58/6407283/3ad8ae7b5e4a/12885_2019_5396_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f58/6407283/3ad8ae7b5e4a/12885_2019_5396_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f58/6407283/3ad8ae7b5e4a/12885_2019_5396_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) comparing the quality of life between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric Cancer (study protocol).一项多中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验(III 期)比较腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术与全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌患者生活质量的差异(研究方案)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5396-8.
2
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07: a randomized controlled trial.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术:KLASS-07 随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4810-4820. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001543.
3
Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy to Treat Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report: A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (The KLASS-07 Trial).腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术治疗胃癌的术后发病率和死亡率:中期报告:一项 III 期多中心前瞻性随机临床试验(KLASS-07 试验)。
J Gastric Cancer. 2024 Jul;24(3):257-266. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e22.
4
Meta-analysis and systematic review on laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer: Preliminary study for a multicenter prospective KLASS07 trial.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)治疗胃癌的荟萃分析和系统评价:多中心前瞻性 KLASS07 试验的初步研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;45(12):2231-2240. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.030. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
5
Does the Difference of Invasiveness between Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Lead to a Difference in Early Surgical Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Trial.全腹腔镜远端胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术的侵袭性差异是否会导致早期手术结果的差异?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1836-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4229-x. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
6
Comparison of the cost and outcomes following totally laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer: a single-institution comparison.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术的成本与结局比较:单机构比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4656-1. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Comparison of Reduced Port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy.简化端口全腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(Duet TLDG)与传统腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2567-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
8
Comparison of short-term outcomes and quality of life in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and totally robotic distal gastrectomy for clinical stage I-III gastric cancer: study protocol for a multi-institutional randomised clinical trial.临床Ⅰ-Ⅲ期胃癌行全腹腔镜与全机器人辅助远端胃切除术的短期疗效和生活质量比较:多中心随机临床试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e043535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043535.
9
Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜远端胃切除术与开腹远端胃切除术治疗Ⅰ期胃癌患者的长期生存效果比较:KLASS-01 随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):506-513. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.
10
Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的优势比较。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0360-3. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Current clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery in China.中国目前关于胃癌手术的临床试验。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):4369-4382. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4369.
2
Morbidity and quality of life of totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (CKLASS01).完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌的发病率及生活质量:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验(CKLASS01)
Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;28(1):131-144. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01561-y. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
3
Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy to Treat Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report: A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (The KLASS-07 Trial).

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of uncut Roux-en-Y Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Which technique is better for avoiding biliary reflux and gastritis?远端胃癌根治术后 Roux-en-Y 非离断式 Billroth II 重建术与 Roux-en-Y 离断式 Billroth II 重建术随机对照研究:哪种技术更能避免胆汁反流性胃炎?
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 14;23(34):6350-6356. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6350.
2
Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014.韩国胃癌协会2014年全国胃癌调查
J Gastric Cancer. 2016 Sep;16(3):131-140. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.131. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术治疗胃癌的术后发病率和死亡率:中期报告:一项 III 期多中心前瞻性随机临床试验(KLASS-07 试验)。
J Gastric Cancer. 2024 Jul;24(3):257-266. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e22.
4
Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Quality of Life of Braun Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Reconstruction in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中 Braun 吻合在胃肠重建中的临床疗效及生活质量分析:单中心回顾性研究。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1256-1265. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01079-7. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07: a randomized controlled trial.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术:KLASS-07 随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4810-4820. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001543.
6
Exploring ideal operative time for best outcomes in gastric cancer surgery: A multi-institutional study based on KLASS-07 database.探索胃癌手术最佳预后的理想手术时机:一项基于KLASS-07数据库的多机构研究。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 30;35(6):660-674. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.10.
7
Comparison of short-term efficacy between totally laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer.老年胃癌患者全腹腔镜胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助胃切除术的短期疗效比较
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):950-962. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.950.
8
Analysis of the Preventive Action of Rivaroxaban against Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients after Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy.分析利伐沙班对腹腔镜根治性胃切除术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的预防作用。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 10;2022:7140066. doi: 10.1155/2022/7140066. eCollection 2022.
9
Efficacy of Omentum-Preserving Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.保留大网膜胃癌切除术治疗胃癌患者的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 3;11:710814. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.710814. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparison of short-term outcomes and quality of life in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and totally robotic distal gastrectomy for clinical stage I-III gastric cancer: study protocol for a multi-institutional randomised clinical trial.临床Ⅰ-Ⅲ期胃癌行全腹腔镜与全机器人辅助远端胃切除术的短期疗效和生活质量比较:多中心随机临床试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e043535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043535.
Comparison Between Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.
腹腔镜远端胃切除术后Billroth-II加Braun吻合与Roux-en-Y重建的比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jun;20(6):1083-90. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3138-7. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
Comparison of the cost and outcomes following totally laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer: a single-institution comparison.完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术的成本与结局比较:单机构比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4656-1. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
5
Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).与开放性远端胃癌切除术相比,腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗Ⅰ期胃癌的发病率降低:一项多中心随机对照试验(KLASS-01)的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
6
A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜远端胃切除术后三种重建方法结局的比较。
J Gastric Cancer. 2015 Mar;15(1):46-52. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.46.
7
Does the Difference of Invasiveness between Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Lead to a Difference in Early Surgical Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Trial.全腹腔镜远端胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术的侵袭性差异是否会导致早期手术结果的差异?一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1836-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4229-x. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study.腹腔镜胃癌根治术的长期疗效:一项大规模病例对照和病例匹配的韩国多中心研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
9
Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01).比较腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术与开放远端胃癌切除术治疗胃腺癌的前瞻性随机对照试验(III期)(KLASS 01)
J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Feb;84(2):123-30. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.2.123. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
The impact of obesity on the use of a totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.肥胖对胃癌患者行全腹腔镜远端胃切除术的影响。
J Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jun;12(2):108-12. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.2.108. Epub 2012 Jun 27.