Suppr超能文献

非药物疗法对哮喘控制的影响:文献系统评价。

Impact of non-drug therapies on asthma control: A systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

a Department of General Medicine , Rouen University , Rouen , France.

b Department of General Medicine , Rennes University , Rennes , France.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Apr;25(2):65-76. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1574742. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing access to effective therapies, asthma control still needs improvement. Many non-drug factors, such as allergens, air pollutants and stress also affect asthma control and patient quality of life, but an overview of the effectiveness of non-drug interventions on asthma control was lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To identify non-drug interventions likely to improve asthma control.

METHODS

A systematic review of the available literature in Medline and the Cochrane Library was conducted in March 2017, without any time limit. Initial searching identified 884 potentially relevant clinical trial reports, literature reviews and meta-analyses, which were screened for inclusion using criteria of quality, relevance, and reporting outcomes based on asthma control.

RESULTS

Eighty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. In general, the quality of the studies was low. Patient education programmes (22 studies) significantly improved asthma control. Multifaceted interventions (10 studies), which combined patient education programmes with decreasing exposure to indoor allergens and pollutants, significantly improved asthma control based on clinically relevant outcomes. Renovating homes to reduce exposure to allergens and indoor pollutants improved control (two studies). Air filtration systems (five studies) were effective, especially in children exposed to second-hand smoke. Most measures attempting to reduce exposure to dust mites were ineffective (five studies). Dietary interventions (eight studies) were ineffective. Promoting physical activity (five studies) tended to yield positive results, but the results did not attain significance.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-six interventions were effective in asthma control. Simultaneously combining several action plans, each focusing on different aspects of asthma management, seems most likely to be effective.

摘要

背景

尽管获得了越来越多有效的治疗方法,但哮喘控制仍有待改善。许多非药物因素,如过敏原、空气污染物和压力,也会影响哮喘控制和患者的生活质量,但缺乏关于非药物干预对哮喘控制有效性的综述。

目的

确定可能改善哮喘控制的非药物干预措施。

方法

我们于 2017 年 3 月在 Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆中对现有文献进行了系统评价,没有时间限制。初步检索确定了 884 份可能相关的临床试验报告、文献综述和荟萃分析,根据哮喘控制的质量、相关性和报告结果标准对其进行了筛选以确定是否纳入。

结果

82 篇出版物符合纳入标准。一般来说,研究的质量较低。患者教育计划(22 项研究)显著改善了哮喘控制。多方面的干预措施(10 项研究),将患者教育计划与减少室内过敏原和污染物的暴露相结合,根据临床相关结果显著改善了哮喘控制。对房屋进行装修以减少过敏原和室内污染物的暴露可改善控制(两项研究)。空气过滤系统(五项研究)有效,特别是在儿童暴露于二手烟的情况下。大多数试图减少尘螨暴露的措施均无效(五项研究)。饮食干预(八项研究)无效。促进体育活动(五项研究)往往会产生积极的结果,但结果并未达到显著性。

结论

26 种干预措施对哮喘控制有效。同时结合几个行动计划,每个计划都侧重于哮喘管理的不同方面,似乎最有可能有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa8/6493294/35af3e6074a9/IGEN_A_1574742_F0001_B.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验